Rediscovering the Contract of Employment for Non-Standard Workers in the UK Common Law

J. McClelland
{"title":"Rediscovering the Contract of Employment for Non-Standard Workers in the UK Common Law","authors":"J. McClelland","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2324973","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The central concept underlying access to employment rights is based on a binary divide between contract of service (the employee) and contract for services (independent contractor). New classifications of work relationships have however been added over time. These new categories do not sit comfortably with the binary classification system. New ways of working may undermine what we traditionally understand as working relationships. As such the usefulness of this system has been questioned. Yet contract remains central. In view of the lack of any practical alternative it is worth considering whether the interpretation of contract law itself is capable of development. The modern law of contract has the potential capacity to redefine the binary divide so that only those who are truly self-employed are excluded from statutory protection. To do this the meaning of 'contract of service' would need to reflect the reality of labour market contracting and take account of the impact of exploitative bargaining strength. This reinterpretation could potentially expand the classification of contract of service to encompass more non-standard workers within the remit of full employment protection in the UK. Such a possibility depends on how far the employment tribunal and courts have incorporated a contextual framework into their interpretation of contract and how far any context incorporates wider social values consistent with public law standards of fairness and reasonableness. This paper contends that there needs to be explicit acknowledgement by the judiciary that the contextual interpretation of contracts needs to include the economic, political and social imperatives that informed the statutory environment. By seeing the employment relationship in this wider context the pragmatic judge may truly take a purposive stance.","PeriodicalId":320573,"journal":{"name":"University of Leicester School of Law Research Paper Series","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Leicester School of Law Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2324973","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The central concept underlying access to employment rights is based on a binary divide between contract of service (the employee) and contract for services (independent contractor). New classifications of work relationships have however been added over time. These new categories do not sit comfortably with the binary classification system. New ways of working may undermine what we traditionally understand as working relationships. As such the usefulness of this system has been questioned. Yet contract remains central. In view of the lack of any practical alternative it is worth considering whether the interpretation of contract law itself is capable of development. The modern law of contract has the potential capacity to redefine the binary divide so that only those who are truly self-employed are excluded from statutory protection. To do this the meaning of 'contract of service' would need to reflect the reality of labour market contracting and take account of the impact of exploitative bargaining strength. This reinterpretation could potentially expand the classification of contract of service to encompass more non-standard workers within the remit of full employment protection in the UK. Such a possibility depends on how far the employment tribunal and courts have incorporated a contextual framework into their interpretation of contract and how far any context incorporates wider social values consistent with public law standards of fairness and reasonableness. This paper contends that there needs to be explicit acknowledgement by the judiciary that the contextual interpretation of contracts needs to include the economic, political and social imperatives that informed the statutory environment. By seeing the employment relationship in this wider context the pragmatic judge may truly take a purposive stance.
英国普通法对非标准工人雇佣合同的再认识
获得就业权利的核心概念是基于服务合同(雇员)和服务合同(独立承包商)之间的二元划分。然而,随着时间的推移,新的工作关系分类已经增加。这些新的分类与二元分类系统不相容。新的工作方式可能会破坏我们传统上所理解的工作关系。因此,这一制度的有用性受到了质疑。然而,合同仍然是核心。鉴于缺乏任何可行的替代方案,合同法解释本身是否具有发展能力值得考虑。现代合同法有可能重新定义二元划分,以便只有那些真正的自雇人士才被排除在法定保护之外。要做到这一点,“服务合同”的含义需要反映劳动力市场合同的现实,并考虑到剥削性议价能力的影响。这种重新解释可能会扩大服务合同的分类,将更多的非标准工人纳入英国充分就业保护的范围内。这种可能性取决于就业法庭和法院在多大程度上将上下文框架纳入其对合同的解释,以及任何上下文在多大程度上纳入符合公法公平和合理标准的更广泛的社会价值。本文认为,司法机构需要明确承认,对合同的上下文解释需要包括影响法定环境的经济、政治和社会必要性。通过在这一更广泛的背景下看待雇佣关系,务实的法官可能真正采取一种目的立场。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信