A comprehensive analysis of object-oriented design: towards a measure of assessing design ability

T. L. Lewis, Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones, M. Rosson
{"title":"A comprehensive analysis of object-oriented design: towards a measure of assessing design ability","authors":"T. L. Lewis, Manuel A. Pérez-Quiñones, M. Rosson","doi":"10.1109/FIE.2004.1408791","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Throughout literature, there are varying schools of thought on what constitutes object-oriented design (OOD). Does OOD encompass the selection of the appropriate interfaces? Does reusing classes represent \"good\" OOD? And what about UML, if we have class interaction diagrams, is this OOD? There is a need to establish a set of requisite competencies to guide teaching of OOD. Within this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of seven essential principles of object-oriented design. In order to validate the effectiveness of the guiding principles OOD, we developed the design readiness assessment scale (DRAS). The DRAS provides a classification of one's design ability in relation to the testing population. We further discuss a study of the DRAS using a subject pool consisting of freshmen computer science (novice designers) and graduate/professionals (expert designers). We present the preliminary results of this study and its impact on the future OOD education.","PeriodicalId":339926,"journal":{"name":"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"34th Annual Frontiers in Education, 2004. FIE 2004.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/FIE.2004.1408791","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Throughout literature, there are varying schools of thought on what constitutes object-oriented design (OOD). Does OOD encompass the selection of the appropriate interfaces? Does reusing classes represent "good" OOD? And what about UML, if we have class interaction diagrams, is this OOD? There is a need to establish a set of requisite competencies to guide teaching of OOD. Within this paper, we present a comprehensive analysis of seven essential principles of object-oriented design. In order to validate the effectiveness of the guiding principles OOD, we developed the design readiness assessment scale (DRAS). The DRAS provides a classification of one's design ability in relation to the testing population. We further discuss a study of the DRAS using a subject pool consisting of freshmen computer science (novice designers) and graduate/professionals (expert designers). We present the preliminary results of this study and its impact on the future OOD education.
面向对象设计的综合分析:设计能力的评估方法
纵观文献,关于面向对象设计(OOD)的构成有不同的思想流派。OOD是否包括选择合适的接口?重用类代表“好的”OOD吗?那么UML呢,如果我们有类交互图,它是OOD吗?有必要建立一套必要的能力来指导OOD的教学。在本文中,我们对面向对象设计的七个基本原则进行了全面的分析。为了验证OOD指导原则的有效性,我们开发了设计就绪评估量表(DRAS)。DRAS提供了一个与测试人群相关的设计能力分类。我们进一步讨论了使用由计算机科学新生(新手设计师)和研究生/专业人员(专家设计师)组成的主题池对DRAS的研究。现就本研究的初步结果及其对未来良好认知教育的影响作一介绍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信