Making (Bio)Logical Connections

Abstract

At first blush, computing and biology seem an odd couple, yet they formed a liaison of sorts from the very first years of the electronic digital computer. Following a seminal paper published in 1943 by neurophysiologist Warren McCulloch and mathematical logician Warren Pitts on a mathematical model of neuronal activity, John von Neumann of the Institute of Advanced Study, Princeton, presented at a symposium in 1948 a paper that compared the behaviors of computer circuits and neuronal circuits in the brain. The resulting publication was the fountainhead of what came to be called cellular automata in the 1960s. Von Neumann’s insight was the parallel between the abstraction of biological neurons (nerve cells) as natural binary (on–off) switches and the abstraction of physical computer circuit elements (at the time, relays and vacuum tubes) as artificial binary switches. His ambition was to unify the two and construct a formal universal theory. One remarkable aspect of von Neumann’s program was inspired by the biology: His universal automata must be able to self-reproduce. So his neuron-like automata must be both computational and constructive. In 1955, invited by Yale University to deliver the Silliman Lectures for 1956, von Neumann chose as his topic the relationship between the computer and the brain. He died before being able to deliver the lectures, but the unfinished manuscript was published by Yale University Press under the title The Computer and the Brain (1958). Von Neumann’s definitive writings on self-reproducing cellular automata, edited by his one-time collaborator Arthur Burks of the University of Michigan, was eventually published in 1966 as the book Theory of Self-Reproducing Automata. A possible structure of a von Neumann–style cellular automaton is depicted in Figure 7.1. It comprises a (finite or infinite) configuration of cells in which a cell can be in one of a finite set of states. The state of a cell at any time t is determined by its own state and those of its immediate neighbors in the preceding point of time t – 1, according to a state transition rule.