Effects of variability of practice using the concept of differential approach and traditional learning on learning round-off in gymnastics based on the analysis of movement construction

S. Ata
{"title":"Effects of variability of practice using the concept of differential approach and traditional learning on learning round-off in gymnastics based on the analysis of movement construction","authors":"S. Ata","doi":"10.21608/ajssa.2021.260903","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": The objective of this study is to assess the effect of differential learning approach in comparison with the traditional learning in learning round off in gymnastics as a one of close motor skill. thirty two accademic students (boys M = 20.5, SD = 3.2 years) parallelized to two groups according to pre-test results: differential learning group wheareas the other group was tranditional learning group. in both groups 90. Min. Training units (2 dayes/week) were performed for 8 weeks. The 'Differential learning' group was based on the indications for differential learning according to Schöllhorn (1999), tabel (1) shows a list of possible variations of the round off. In this experiment differential learning group completed stochastic movement variations and Increasing the number of movement fluctuations, The 'tranditional learning' group completes a methodical series of round off with blocks of repetitive movements that build on one to another, in addition the students in this group was perfromed the skill with corrective feedbacks. The contents of traditional technique training are based on the classic methodical exercise series for learning the round off. Results was determined that, differential learnig method is more effective than traditional learning method in learing round off in gymnastics.","PeriodicalId":133050,"journal":{"name":"Assiut Journal of Sport Science and Arts","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Assiut Journal of Sport Science and Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21608/ajssa.2021.260903","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

: The objective of this study is to assess the effect of differential learning approach in comparison with the traditional learning in learning round off in gymnastics as a one of close motor skill. thirty two accademic students (boys M = 20.5, SD = 3.2 years) parallelized to two groups according to pre-test results: differential learning group wheareas the other group was tranditional learning group. in both groups 90. Min. Training units (2 dayes/week) were performed for 8 weeks. The 'Differential learning' group was based on the indications for differential learning according to Schöllhorn (1999), tabel (1) shows a list of possible variations of the round off. In this experiment differential learning group completed stochastic movement variations and Increasing the number of movement fluctuations, The 'tranditional learning' group completes a methodical series of round off with blocks of repetitive movements that build on one to another, in addition the students in this group was perfromed the skill with corrective feedbacks. The contents of traditional technique training are based on the classic methodical exercise series for learning the round off. Results was determined that, differential learnig method is more effective than traditional learning method in learing round off in gymnastics.
基于动作结构分析的微分方法与传统学习概念练习变异性对体操四舍五入学习的影响
摘要:本研究的目的是比较差异学习方法与传统学习方法在体操近距离动作技能四舍五入学习中的效果。32名男生(M = 20.5, SD = 3.2岁)根据前测结果平行分为两组:差异学习组,另一组为传统学习组。两组均为90。最小训练单元(2天/周)进行8周。“差异学习”组基于Schöllhorn(1999)的差异学习指示,表(1)显示了舍入的可能变化列表。在这个实验中,差异学习组完成了随机动作变化和增加动作波动的数量,“传统学习”组完成了一系列有系统的四舍五入,这些四舍五入是建立在一个又一个重复动作的块上的,此外,这个组的学生在练习技能时得到了纠正反馈。传统技术训练的内容是基于经典的四舍五入学习方法练习系列。结果表明,在体操四舍五入学习中,微分学习法比传统学习法更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信