{"title":"Mapping the World of Labour","authors":"Daniel Blackburn","doi":"10.1353/iur.2023.a905534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"international labour rights, I have been struck by the lack of accessible and complete information about the international labour movement. When I arrived at ICTUR in the 1990s, there was a small library and a few dozen magazine subscriptions. Probably the best of these was the American grassroots union magazine LaborNotes. It at least had a bit of wit and character, contrasting sharply with the dull and dreary copies of the WFTU’s World Trade Union Movement and its mirror image, the ICFTU’s glossy Trade Union World. The Christian WCL’s publication World of Labor was the least inspiring. These magazines set out positions and arguments on then current affairs in various parts of the world, and contained quotes from union leaders allied to “their” political cause. An independent effort, International Labour Reports, had to close following a defamation row, but there were a number of others that arrived regularly from every corner of the earth, most notable were probably the China Labour Bulletin, the South African Labour Bulletin, and India’s LabourFile, though among many others GAWU’s militant Combat newsletter from Guyana was – and still is – worth reading. What none of them did very well – or even at all – was to try and coherently map the trade union landscape around the world, and for a while I struggled amidst a sea of confusing acronyms, with little real sense of who these organisations were. At the ICTUR office, what passed for a “guide” to the global labour movement was an old Czech photo album stuffed with trade unionists’ business cards, which was no help at all. When I acquired an old copy of Trade Unions of the World (at the time essentially a commercial publication that drew heavily on the CIA’s World Fact Book), it was a revelation. That this should be the main guide for an organisation founded in opposition to Western imperialism was somewhat ironic, but apparently, it was ever thus, as Peter Waterman recalled of his time working at the WFTU, thirty years earlier:","PeriodicalId":165151,"journal":{"name":"International Union Rights","volume":"30 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Union Rights","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/iur.2023.a905534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
international labour rights, I have been struck by the lack of accessible and complete information about the international labour movement. When I arrived at ICTUR in the 1990s, there was a small library and a few dozen magazine subscriptions. Probably the best of these was the American grassroots union magazine LaborNotes. It at least had a bit of wit and character, contrasting sharply with the dull and dreary copies of the WFTU’s World Trade Union Movement and its mirror image, the ICFTU’s glossy Trade Union World. The Christian WCL’s publication World of Labor was the least inspiring. These magazines set out positions and arguments on then current affairs in various parts of the world, and contained quotes from union leaders allied to “their” political cause. An independent effort, International Labour Reports, had to close following a defamation row, but there were a number of others that arrived regularly from every corner of the earth, most notable were probably the China Labour Bulletin, the South African Labour Bulletin, and India’s LabourFile, though among many others GAWU’s militant Combat newsletter from Guyana was – and still is – worth reading. What none of them did very well – or even at all – was to try and coherently map the trade union landscape around the world, and for a while I struggled amidst a sea of confusing acronyms, with little real sense of who these organisations were. At the ICTUR office, what passed for a “guide” to the global labour movement was an old Czech photo album stuffed with trade unionists’ business cards, which was no help at all. When I acquired an old copy of Trade Unions of the World (at the time essentially a commercial publication that drew heavily on the CIA’s World Fact Book), it was a revelation. That this should be the main guide for an organisation founded in opposition to Western imperialism was somewhat ironic, but apparently, it was ever thus, as Peter Waterman recalled of his time working at the WFTU, thirty years earlier:
在国际劳工权利方面,我对缺乏关于国际劳工运动的可获取和完整的信息感到震惊。上世纪90年代我刚到ICTUR的时候,那里只有一个小图书馆和几十份杂志订阅服务。其中最好的可能是美国草根工会杂志《LaborNotes》。它至少有一点机智和个性,与世界工会联合会沉闷沉闷的《世界工会运动》副本及其镜像——国际工会联合会光鲜亮丽的《世界工会》形成鲜明对比。基督教WCL的出版物《劳动世界》(World of Labor)最不鼓舞人心。这些杂志阐述了对当时世界各地时事的立场和观点,并引用了与“他们的”政治事业结盟的工会领导人的话。独立的《国际劳工报告》(International Labour Reports)在一场诽谤纠纷后不得不关闭,但还有其他一些来自世界各地的定期报道,其中最著名的可能是《中国劳工通讯》、《南非劳工通讯》和《印度劳工档案》,尽管GAWU来自圭亚那的激进的《战斗通讯》(Combat newsletter)在过去和现在都值得一读。他们都没有做得很好,甚至根本没有做得很好,那就是试图连贯地描绘世界各地的工会格局,有一段时间,我在一堆令人困惑的缩写词中挣扎,对这些组织是谁几乎没有真正的认识。在ICTUR办公室,一本被当作全球劳工运动“指南”的捷克旧相册,里面塞满了工会会员的名片,这根本帮不上忙。当我得到一本旧的《世界工会》(当时基本上是一本商业出版物,大量借鉴了中央情报局的《世界概况》)时,我恍然大悟。这应该成为一个反对西方帝国主义的组织的主要指导方针,这有点讽刺,但显然,正如彼得·沃特曼(Peter Waterman)回忆他30年前在WFTU工作时所说的那样: