A comparative study to assess the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in the ultrasound-guided pectoral and serratus plane nerve block for patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy

E. Mahdy, A. Elrahman, Elsayed Abdelzaam
{"title":"A comparative study to assess the efficacy of dexmedetomidine as an adjuvant to bupivacaine in the ultrasound-guided pectoral and serratus plane nerve block for patients undergoing modified radical mastectomy","authors":"E. Mahdy, A. Elrahman, Elsayed Abdelzaam","doi":"10.4103/ejca.ejca_13_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aims Dexmedetomidine has been noticed to be safe and efficient in prolonging the duration of peripheral nerve blocks. This study was designed to compare the length, quality of postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic stability, and patient’s satisfaction and number of patients requiring analgesia with the addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine versus plain bupivacaine in pectoral nerve block (pecs) for modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Patients and methods These patients were randomly allocated using a computerized random number generator into two groups: group I (control group) (30 patients) received 25 ml of 0.25% of plain bupivacaine that was used for modified pecs block. Group II (study group) (30 patients) received 25 ml of 0.25% of plain bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (Precedex) 1 μg/kg that were used for pecs block. Results The results showed a longer duration of analgesia in group II (21±3 h) in comparison with group I (16±4 h). Statistical analysis showed a statistically highly significant (P=0.006). Also, consumption of morphine was lower in group II (5±3 mg/24 h) in comparison with group I (9±4 mg/24 h). Statistical analysis showed a statistically significant (P=0.01). Conclusion Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to bupivacaine helps increase the duration and improves the quality of postoperative analgesia in pecs block without serious side effects.","PeriodicalId":289218,"journal":{"name":"The Egyptian Journal of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Egyptian Journal of Cardiothoracic Anesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejca.ejca_13_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aims Dexmedetomidine has been noticed to be safe and efficient in prolonging the duration of peripheral nerve blocks. This study was designed to compare the length, quality of postoperative analgesia, hemodynamic stability, and patient’s satisfaction and number of patients requiring analgesia with the addition of dexmedetomidine to bupivacaine versus plain bupivacaine in pectoral nerve block (pecs) for modified radical mastectomy (MRM). Patients and methods These patients were randomly allocated using a computerized random number generator into two groups: group I (control group) (30 patients) received 25 ml of 0.25% of plain bupivacaine that was used for modified pecs block. Group II (study group) (30 patients) received 25 ml of 0.25% of plain bupivacaine plus dexmedetomidine (Precedex) 1 μg/kg that were used for pecs block. Results The results showed a longer duration of analgesia in group II (21±3 h) in comparison with group I (16±4 h). Statistical analysis showed a statistically highly significant (P=0.006). Also, consumption of morphine was lower in group II (5±3 mg/24 h) in comparison with group I (9±4 mg/24 h). Statistical analysis showed a statistically significant (P=0.01). Conclusion Dexmedetomidine as an adjunct to bupivacaine helps increase the duration and improves the quality of postoperative analgesia in pecs block without serious side effects.
一项评价右美托咪定辅助布比卡因在超声引导下行改良乳房根治术患者胸肌及锯肌平面神经阻滞疗效的比较研究
背景与目的右美托咪定在延长周围神经阻滞时间方面是安全有效的。本研究旨在比较改良乳房根治术(MRM)胸椎神经阻滞(pecs)中,右美托咪定加布比卡因与普通布比卡因相比,术后镇痛时间、质量、血流动力学稳定性、患者满意度和需要镇痛的患者数量。患者和方法采用计算机化随机数发生器将患者随机分为两组:I组(对照组)(30例)给予0.25%普通布比卡因25 ml用于改良胸大肌阻滞。第二组(研究组)患者30例,给予0.25%普通布比卡因25 ml加右美托咪定(precdex) 1 μg/kg,用于胸肌阻滞。结果ⅱ组镇痛时间(21±3 h)明显长于ⅰ组(16±4 h)。经统计学分析,差异有高度统计学意义(P=0.006)。吗啡用量(5±3 mg/24 h)低于吗啡用量(9±4 mg/24 h)。经统计学分析,差异有统计学意义(P=0.01)。结论右美托咪定辅助布比卡因可延长胸大肌阻滞术后镇痛时间,改善镇痛质量,无不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信