CaptainTeach: a platform for in-flow peer review of programming assignments

J. Politz, S. Krishnamurthi, Kathi Fisler
{"title":"CaptainTeach: a platform for in-flow peer review of programming assignments","authors":"J. Politz, S. Krishnamurthi, Kathi Fisler","doi":"10.1145/2591708.2602687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Peer review is effective for teaching students to evaluate approaches to problems, fostering collaboration, and assessing other students' work. Peer review often happens after assignments are turned in, on complete artifacts that other students have created. We've been experimenting with a different style of peer review, which we call in-flow reviewing, in which programming assignments are broken into reviewable stages. After students complete each stage they review one anothers' work, allowing for feedback early on in the assignment. We've built a system, dubbed Captain Teach, for exploring in-flow reviewing for both programming and written assignments. In our demonstration and tutorial, we will show what the student experience looks like for a Captain Teach assignment, explain the interface that instructors have for creating assignments in Captain Teach, outline some of the mechanisms for anonymously assigning reviews and distributing feedback, and discuss future directions for the tool.","PeriodicalId":334476,"journal":{"name":"Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2591708.2602687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Peer review is effective for teaching students to evaluate approaches to problems, fostering collaboration, and assessing other students' work. Peer review often happens after assignments are turned in, on complete artifacts that other students have created. We've been experimenting with a different style of peer review, which we call in-flow reviewing, in which programming assignments are broken into reviewable stages. After students complete each stage they review one anothers' work, allowing for feedback early on in the assignment. We've built a system, dubbed Captain Teach, for exploring in-flow reviewing for both programming and written assignments. In our demonstration and tutorial, we will show what the student experience looks like for a Captain Teach assignment, explain the interface that instructors have for creating assignments in Captain Teach, outline some of the mechanisms for anonymously assigning reviews and distributing feedback, and discuss future directions for the tool.
CaptainTeach:对编程作业进行同行评审的平台
同行评议对于教导学生评估解决问题的方法、促进合作和评估其他学生的工作是有效的。同行评议通常发生在作业上交之后,对其他学生完成的工件进行评议。我们一直在试验一种不同风格的同行评审,我们称之为流内评审,在这种评审中,编程任务被分成可评审的阶段。在学生们完成每个阶段后,他们会互相回顾彼此的作业,以便在作业的早期得到反馈。我们已经建立了一个系统,被称为“教学船长”,用于探索编程和书面作业的流程审查。在我们的演示和教程中,我们将展示Captain Teach作业的学生体验,解释教师在Captain Teach中创建作业的界面,概述匿名分配评论和分发反馈的一些机制,并讨论该工具的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信