Tasking Students With Empathy: Field Observations, COVID-19, and Assessing an Anthropological Sensibility

T. King, Carina Truyts, Anne Faithfull
{"title":"Tasking Students With Empathy: Field Observations, COVID-19, and Assessing an Anthropological Sensibility","authors":"T. King, Carina Truyts, Anne Faithfull","doi":"10.22582/ta.v11i2.614","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In 2019 and 2020 students in an Australian university conducted a short ethnographic exercise, a ‘journal’, with an attunement to the multiplicity of meanings evident in a single space by a range of interlocutors. We emphasised and assessed ‘empathy’ as a short-hand for the kind of anthropological sensibility we hoped to encourage. By requesting an account that represented an awareness of how ‘others’ encounter and come to ‘know’ the world we promoted their adoption of a modality which is central to the discipline. We wanted them to describe the world—the terrain, the stuff of their surroundings—based on their observations of how these others behaved. To couch it in anthropological terms, we wanted them to be attuned to a multiplicity of ‘taskscapes’, Ingold’s term for the mutual constitution of people and places through culturally politically, economically, and spiritually informed actions (‘tasks’) (Ingold, 1993). These ‘taskscapes’ were illustrated through the work of McKee (2016), whose account of multiple simultaneous experiences in the Negev desert by those living in (variously labelled) Israel/Palestine, represented an unexperienced domain for most of the Australian students. Rather than reinforcing the dated notion that anthropology is something that is done ‘elsewhere’, by asking students to focus on anthropology ‘at home’ they embodied their understanding of a transferable concept—introduced via an ‘exotic’ example—through a locally embedded experience. This paper describes the delivery of this assignment in 2019 and 2020 and explores in detail the content of five student journals and their evidence of the targeted learning.","PeriodicalId":407748,"journal":{"name":"Teaching Anthropology","volume":"40 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22582/ta.v11i2.614","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

In 2019 and 2020 students in an Australian university conducted a short ethnographic exercise, a ‘journal’, with an attunement to the multiplicity of meanings evident in a single space by a range of interlocutors. We emphasised and assessed ‘empathy’ as a short-hand for the kind of anthropological sensibility we hoped to encourage. By requesting an account that represented an awareness of how ‘others’ encounter and come to ‘know’ the world we promoted their adoption of a modality which is central to the discipline. We wanted them to describe the world—the terrain, the stuff of their surroundings—based on their observations of how these others behaved. To couch it in anthropological terms, we wanted them to be attuned to a multiplicity of ‘taskscapes’, Ingold’s term for the mutual constitution of people and places through culturally politically, economically, and spiritually informed actions (‘tasks’) (Ingold, 1993). These ‘taskscapes’ were illustrated through the work of McKee (2016), whose account of multiple simultaneous experiences in the Negev desert by those living in (variously labelled) Israel/Palestine, represented an unexperienced domain for most of the Australian students. Rather than reinforcing the dated notion that anthropology is something that is done ‘elsewhere’, by asking students to focus on anthropology ‘at home’ they embodied their understanding of a transferable concept—introduced via an ‘exotic’ example—through a locally embedded experience. This paper describes the delivery of this assignment in 2019 and 2020 and explores in detail the content of five student journals and their evidence of the targeted learning.
赋予学生同理心:实地观察、COVID-19和评估人类学敏感性
2019年和2020年,澳大利亚一所大学的学生进行了一项简短的民族志练习,即“日记”,通过一系列对话者对单一空间中明显的多重意义进行了调整。我们强调并评估了“同理心”作为我们希望鼓励的那种人类学敏感性的简称。通过要求一种代表“他人”如何遭遇和“了解”世界的意识的描述,我们促进了他们采用一种对学科至关重要的模式。我们想让他们描述这个世界——地形,他们周围的东西——基于他们对其他人行为的观察。从人类学的角度来看,我们希望他们能够适应“任务景观”的多样性,Ingold的术语是通过文化、政治、经济和精神上的行动(“任务”)来实现人和地方的共同构成(Ingold, 1993)。这些“任务场景”是通过McKee(2016)的作品来说明的,他描述了生活在以色列/巴勒斯坦的人在内盖夫沙漠的多重同时经历,对大多数澳大利亚学生来说,这是一个没有经验的领域。通过要求学生关注“在家”的人类学,他们没有强化人类学是“在其他地方”做的事情的过时观念,而是通过一个“异国”的例子,通过当地的嵌入式经验,体现了他们对可转移概念的理解。本文描述了该任务在2019年和2020年的交付情况,并详细探讨了五份学生期刊的内容及其针对性学习的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信