Team Based Learning is a helpful strategy for teaching respiratory guidelines to Trainee Medical Doctors

D. Draicchio, A. Choudhury, J. Alcolado
{"title":"Team Based Learning is a helpful strategy for teaching respiratory guidelines to Trainee Medical Doctors","authors":"D. Draicchio, A. Choudhury, J. Alcolado","doi":"10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Compliance with clinical practice guidelines is sub-optimal. Guidelines are often taught in a didactic method that does not favour a greater depth of understanding. Team Based Learning (TBL) is a five step educational strategy which aims to promote greater retention of knowledge. Methods: Two Respiratory guidelines of key clinical importance were chosen as the teaching subject matter - The BTS guidelines for Oxygen use in adults 2017 and the BTS/SIGN Asthma guidelines 2016. Teaching was delivered via two one-hour sessions to Foundation Year two Doctors. Preparatory reading materials were sent out in advance. Trainees were split into small working groups and asked to complete two attempts of a 20 MCQ test (individually and then in groups). Answers were given through a facilitator led slide presentation with open participant discussion. Deeper learning was facilitated through a detailed case summary with critique of four potential management plans. Results: Feedback was collated from an immediate post-session questionnaire and then afterwards using a Likert rating scale. 100% of participants felt that the objectives of the session were identified and met and that delivery was effective. Doctors were asked to identify any advantages to using the TBL methodology - 42% stated increased session engagement in their free text answers. The same question was asked for disadvantages – the most common theme (35.7% of answers) was increased time of the session. Conclusions: TBL was felt by trainees to be a positive way to learn and embed new knowledge. Further research is needed to see if TBL methods increase the likelihood of guideline adherence in clinical practice.","PeriodicalId":228043,"journal":{"name":"Medical education, web and internet","volume":"71 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical education, web and internet","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.congress-2019.pa1488","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Compliance with clinical practice guidelines is sub-optimal. Guidelines are often taught in a didactic method that does not favour a greater depth of understanding. Team Based Learning (TBL) is a five step educational strategy which aims to promote greater retention of knowledge. Methods: Two Respiratory guidelines of key clinical importance were chosen as the teaching subject matter - The BTS guidelines for Oxygen use in adults 2017 and the BTS/SIGN Asthma guidelines 2016. Teaching was delivered via two one-hour sessions to Foundation Year two Doctors. Preparatory reading materials were sent out in advance. Trainees were split into small working groups and asked to complete two attempts of a 20 MCQ test (individually and then in groups). Answers were given through a facilitator led slide presentation with open participant discussion. Deeper learning was facilitated through a detailed case summary with critique of four potential management plans. Results: Feedback was collated from an immediate post-session questionnaire and then afterwards using a Likert rating scale. 100% of participants felt that the objectives of the session were identified and met and that delivery was effective. Doctors were asked to identify any advantages to using the TBL methodology - 42% stated increased session engagement in their free text answers. The same question was asked for disadvantages – the most common theme (35.7% of answers) was increased time of the session. Conclusions: TBL was felt by trainees to be a positive way to learn and embed new knowledge. Further research is needed to see if TBL methods increase the likelihood of guideline adherence in clinical practice.
以团队为基础的学习是向实习医生教授呼吸指南的有效策略
背景:临床实践指南的依从性是次优的。指导方针通常是以一种说教式的方法教授的,这种方法不利于更深入的理解。基于团队的学习(TBL)是一种旨在提高知识留存率的五步教育策略。方法:选取具有重要临床意义的两份呼吸系统指南——《BTS成人氧气使用指南2017》和《BTS/SIGN哮喘指南2016》作为教学主题。教学通过两个一小时的课程提供给预科二年级的医生。预备阅读材料已提前发出。受训者被分成几个工作小组,并被要求完成两次20 MCQ的测试(单独完成,然后分组完成)。答案是通过主持人主持的幻灯片演示和公开的参与者讨论给出的。通过详细的案例总结和对四种潜在管理计划的批评,促进了更深入的学习。结果:反馈整理从立即会后的问卷调查,然后使用李克特评定量表。100%的参与者认为会议的目标得到了确定和满足,并且交付是有效的。医生被要求确定使用TBL方法的任何优势- 42%的人在他们的免费文本回答中表示增加了会话参与度。同样的问题被问及缺点——最常见的主题(35.7%的答案)是增加了会议时间。结论:学员认为TBL是一种积极的学习和嵌入新知识的方式。需要进一步的研究来确定TBL方法是否增加了临床实践中遵循指南的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信