FCPA Enforcement Against U.S. and Non-U.S. Companies

M. Diamant, C. Sullivan, Jason H. Smith
{"title":"FCPA Enforcement Against U.S. and Non-U.S. Companies","authors":"M. Diamant, C. Sullivan, Jason H. Smith","doi":"10.36639/mbelr.8.2.fcpa","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This Article explores how U.S. authorities have enforced the FCPA against non-U.S. companies and tests the perception that the FCPA disproportionately impacts U.S. businesses. After briefly discussing the FCPA, its enforcement, and its reach, this Article examines corporate FCPA enforcement activity since the statute’s enactment in 1977. It finds that foreign firms have actually fared worse under the FCPA despite the fact that DOJ and the SEC have brought more enforcement actions against domestic companies in absolute terms. The average cost of resolving an FCPA enforcement action to non-U.S. corporations of resolving an FCPA enforcement action has been more than four times higher than it has been for domestic corporations: $72.3 million to $17.6 million. In recent years, the difference has been even more pronounced—in 2017, the averages were $150.3 million and $16.1 million, respectively. This Article also explores other ways in which FCPA enforcement has more dramatically affected foreign companies. For instance, U.S. enforcement authorities have more frequently required post-resolution obligations for foreign corporations. Between 2004 and 2018, nearly 60 percent of foreign companies involved in FCPA enforcement actions were subject to post-resolution obligations in the form of an independent compliance monitor, self-reporting, or a combination of the two, compared to only 54 percent of domestic companies. Finally, this Article offers some theories to explain these data.","PeriodicalId":177599,"journal":{"name":"Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Michigan Business & Entrepreneurial Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36639/mbelr.8.2.fcpa","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This Article explores how U.S. authorities have enforced the FCPA against non-U.S. companies and tests the perception that the FCPA disproportionately impacts U.S. businesses. After briefly discussing the FCPA, its enforcement, and its reach, this Article examines corporate FCPA enforcement activity since the statute’s enactment in 1977. It finds that foreign firms have actually fared worse under the FCPA despite the fact that DOJ and the SEC have brought more enforcement actions against domestic companies in absolute terms. The average cost of resolving an FCPA enforcement action to non-U.S. corporations of resolving an FCPA enforcement action has been more than four times higher than it has been for domestic corporations: $72.3 million to $17.6 million. In recent years, the difference has been even more pronounced—in 2017, the averages were $150.3 million and $16.1 million, respectively. This Article also explores other ways in which FCPA enforcement has more dramatically affected foreign companies. For instance, U.S. enforcement authorities have more frequently required post-resolution obligations for foreign corporations. Between 2004 and 2018, nearly 60 percent of foreign companies involved in FCPA enforcement actions were subject to post-resolution obligations in the form of an independent compliance monitor, self-reporting, or a combination of the two, compared to only 54 percent of domestic companies. Finally, this Article offers some theories to explain these data.
针对美国和非美国的反海外腐败法执法。公司
本文探讨了美国当局是如何对非美国企业实施《反海外腐败法》的。并测试了《反海外腐败法》对美国企业影响过大的看法。在简要讨论了《反海外腐败法》及其执行和影响范围之后,本文考察了自1977年《反海外腐败法》颁布以来的企业执法活动。报告发现,尽管美国司法部和美国证券交易委员会对国内公司采取了更多的绝对执法行动,但根据《反海外腐败法》,外国公司的情况实际上更糟。解决非美国的《反海外腐败法》执法行动的平均成本。美国公司解决反海外腐败法执法行动的费用是美国国内公司的四倍多:7230万美元至1760万美元。近年来,这种差异更加明显——2017年,平均收入分别为1.503亿美元和1610万美元。本文还探讨了执行《反海外腐败法》对外国公司产生更大影响的其他方式。例如,美国执法机构更频繁地要求外国公司承担解决方案后的义务。在2004年至2018年期间,参与《反海外腐败法》执法行动的近60%的外国公司以独立合规监督、自我报告或两者结合的形式承担了解决后义务,而只有54%的国内公司这样做。最后,本文提出了一些理论来解释这些数据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信