PENEGASAN KEBENARAN AGAMA TERHADAP SAINS

Fredy The
{"title":"PENEGASAN KEBENARAN AGAMA TERHADAP SAINS","authors":"Fredy The","doi":"10.54793/teologi-dan-kependidikan.v7i2.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Science and religion are interesting topics to discuss, because science and religion are often contradicted in the history of their development to date. The purpose of this research is to look at the position of science and religion by reaffirming the truth of religion, especially the Bible as the Word of God towards science. The research method used is a qualitative method with a systematic literature study using the approach of Ian G. Barbour and John F. Hought. Barbour's approach relates science and religion to four types of conflict, independent, dialogue, and integration relationships, while Hought uses four types of conflict, contrast, contact, and confirmation relationships. Based on Barbour and Hought's approach, it can be resulted that science has limitations so that religion must still be the umbrella of science, so that this confirms the truth of religion towards science. Conclusion of this research can be an enlightenment in the midst of different views regarding the creation of the universe according to the views of science and religion through the approach of Barbour and Hought who are scientists as well as theologians so that it can be seen more objectively. The Bible must still be believed to be the highest truth in the midst of the progress of scientific development. \nKeywords: Affirmation, Science, Truth, Religion","PeriodicalId":376180,"journal":{"name":"The Way Jurnal Teologi dan Kependidikan","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Way Jurnal Teologi dan Kependidikan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54793/teologi-dan-kependidikan.v7i2.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Science and religion are interesting topics to discuss, because science and religion are often contradicted in the history of their development to date. The purpose of this research is to look at the position of science and religion by reaffirming the truth of religion, especially the Bible as the Word of God towards science. The research method used is a qualitative method with a systematic literature study using the approach of Ian G. Barbour and John F. Hought. Barbour's approach relates science and religion to four types of conflict, independent, dialogue, and integration relationships, while Hought uses four types of conflict, contrast, contact, and confirmation relationships. Based on Barbour and Hought's approach, it can be resulted that science has limitations so that religion must still be the umbrella of science, so that this confirms the truth of religion towards science. Conclusion of this research can be an enlightenment in the midst of different views regarding the creation of the universe according to the views of science and religion through the approach of Barbour and Hought who are scientists as well as theologians so that it can be seen more objectively. The Bible must still be believed to be the highest truth in the midst of the progress of scientific development. Keywords: Affirmation, Science, Truth, Religion
科学和宗教是讨论的有趣话题,因为科学和宗教在发展历史上经常是相互矛盾的。本研究的目的是通过重申宗教的真理,特别是圣经作为上帝对科学的话语,来审视科学和宗教的地位。本文采用的研究方法是定性研究方法,并采用Ian G. Barbour和John F. Hought的方法进行系统的文献研究。巴伯的方法将科学和宗教与四种类型的冲突、独立、对话和整合关系联系起来,而霍德则使用四种类型的冲突、对比、接触和确认关系。根据巴伯和霍特的方法,可以得出科学有其局限性,因此宗教必须仍然是科学的保护伞,从而证实了宗教对科学的真理。本研究的结论可以通过科学家兼神学家的Barbour和thought的方法,对科学和宗教对宇宙创造的不同观点进行启发,使其更客观地看待。在科学发展的进程中,我们仍然必须相信圣经是最高的真理。关键词:肯定,科学,真理,宗教
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信