Numerical building energy simulation with phase change materials including hysteresis effect for different square building cases in a semi-arid climate

Imad Ait Laasri, Niima Es-sakali, A. Outzourhit, Mohamed Oualid Mghazli
{"title":"Numerical building energy simulation with phase change materials including hysteresis effect for different square building cases in a semi-arid climate","authors":"Imad Ait Laasri, Niima Es-sakali, A. Outzourhit, Mohamed Oualid Mghazli","doi":"10.1109/IREC56325.2022.10002008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Phase change materials (PCM) have captured the interest of researchers in the building sector. As these PCMs could provide a passive temperature regulation, which will help in reducing the energy consumption of Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning (HVAC) units. The implementation of PCMs in buildings requires an encapsulation to ensure no leakage occurs during phase change. The need to assess the energy savings of the PCMs at different building volumes is necessary, so that we can have an idea about the energy savings, cost and payback period of this passive thermal regulation solution. Hence, this paper will evaluate and compare 4 different building volumes in a semi-arid climate with the use of the EnergyPlus simulation engine for the commercial PCM RT 28. These four different building volumes are the following, a 10 m x 10 m, 9 m x 9 m, 8 m x 8 m and 7 m x 7 m square building with a respectively story height of 3 m, 2.7 m, 2.4 m and 2.1 m. The chosen story heights were carefully selected to maintain a constant length to height ratio throughout the different square building volumes. Thus, the main objective of this study is to assess the indoor air temperature fluctuation reduction, the PCM energy savings and the payback period for these different building volumes. The results reveal a great temperature regulation during the summer periods with a maximum temperature fluctuation reduction of 557.7 °C for the 7 m square building. In addition, the most energy efficient building was found to be the 10 m x 10 m x 3 m square building, which was able to save an annual energy of 1600.44 kWh with a low return payback period of 22.38 years.","PeriodicalId":115939,"journal":{"name":"2022 13th International Renewable Energy Congress (IREC)","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 13th International Renewable Energy Congress (IREC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IREC56325.2022.10002008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Phase change materials (PCM) have captured the interest of researchers in the building sector. As these PCMs could provide a passive temperature regulation, which will help in reducing the energy consumption of Heating, Ventilation and Air-Conditioning (HVAC) units. The implementation of PCMs in buildings requires an encapsulation to ensure no leakage occurs during phase change. The need to assess the energy savings of the PCMs at different building volumes is necessary, so that we can have an idea about the energy savings, cost and payback period of this passive thermal regulation solution. Hence, this paper will evaluate and compare 4 different building volumes in a semi-arid climate with the use of the EnergyPlus simulation engine for the commercial PCM RT 28. These four different building volumes are the following, a 10 m x 10 m, 9 m x 9 m, 8 m x 8 m and 7 m x 7 m square building with a respectively story height of 3 m, 2.7 m, 2.4 m and 2.1 m. The chosen story heights were carefully selected to maintain a constant length to height ratio throughout the different square building volumes. Thus, the main objective of this study is to assess the indoor air temperature fluctuation reduction, the PCM energy savings and the payback period for these different building volumes. The results reveal a great temperature regulation during the summer periods with a maximum temperature fluctuation reduction of 557.7 °C for the 7 m square building. In addition, the most energy efficient building was found to be the 10 m x 10 m x 3 m square building, which was able to save an annual energy of 1600.44 kWh with a low return payback period of 22.38 years.
半干旱气候条件下含滞后效应相变材料的方形建筑能耗数值模拟
相变材料(PCM)已经引起了建筑领域研究人员的兴趣。由于这些pcm可以提供被动温度调节,这将有助于减少供暖,通风和空调(HVAC)单元的能源消耗。在建筑物中实施pcm需要封装,以确保在相变期间不会发生泄漏。评估pcm在不同建筑体量下的节能效果是必要的,这样我们就可以了解这种被动式热调节解决方案的节能效果、成本和投资回收期。因此,本文将评估和比较半干旱气候下使用EnergyPlus商用PCM RT 28模拟引擎的4种不同建筑体积。这四种不同的建筑体量如下:10米× 10米、9米× 9米、8米× 8米和7米× 7米的方形建筑,层高分别为3米、2.7米、2.4米和2.1米。所选择的楼层高度经过精心挑选,以在不同的方形建筑体量中保持恒定的长高比。因此,本研究的主要目的是评估这些不同建筑体量的室内空气温度波动减少,PCM节能和投资回收期。结果表明,在夏季期间,7平方米建筑的最大温度波动降低了557.7°C。此外,最节能的建筑被发现是10米× 10米× 3米的建筑,每年能够节省能源1600.44千瓦时,投资回收期为22.38年。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信