Crowdsourcing the (Un)Textbook: Rethinking and Future Thinking the Role of the Textbook in Open Pedagogy

Michelle Harrison, Michael Paskevicius, Irwin Devries, Tannis Morgan
{"title":"Crowdsourcing the (Un)Textbook: Rethinking and Future Thinking the Role of the Textbook in Open Pedagogy","authors":"Michelle Harrison, Michael Paskevicius, Irwin Devries, Tannis Morgan","doi":"10.18357/otessaj.2022.2.1.30","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, we adopt a critical lens to investigate educators' understanding of both traditional and alternative textbooks and examine how open pedagogy may call for a rethinking of textbooks and how they are used in a pedagogical setting. Within the context of open pedagogy, including open textbooks, we conducted workshops that involved faculty, instructional designers, educational developers, and academic administrators during three conferences in 2019: OER19 Conference held in Galway, Ireland; the Cascadia Open Education Summit held in Vancouver, British Columbia; and the Educational Technology Users Group held in Kamloops, British Columbia. Based on data collected during these three interactive workshops, combined with personal reflections from the project instigators, we discuss emerging issues and tensions in the use of textbooks as pedagogical agents/artefacts in teaching and learning, and their relation to open pedagogy. Specifically, we consider what aspects of the use and design of textbook may be rethought in the context of open pedagogy as increasingly ubiquitous access to knowledge and open licensing of content and data become more widely available. This is achieved by prompting educators to describe the best and worst features of the traditional textbook format and reflect on what they might imagine as a potential future for the textbook as a resource to support open pedagogy.","PeriodicalId":242908,"journal":{"name":"The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Open/Technology in Education, Society, and Scholarship Association Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18357/otessaj.2022.2.1.30","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this paper, we adopt a critical lens to investigate educators' understanding of both traditional and alternative textbooks and examine how open pedagogy may call for a rethinking of textbooks and how they are used in a pedagogical setting. Within the context of open pedagogy, including open textbooks, we conducted workshops that involved faculty, instructional designers, educational developers, and academic administrators during three conferences in 2019: OER19 Conference held in Galway, Ireland; the Cascadia Open Education Summit held in Vancouver, British Columbia; and the Educational Technology Users Group held in Kamloops, British Columbia. Based on data collected during these three interactive workshops, combined with personal reflections from the project instigators, we discuss emerging issues and tensions in the use of textbooks as pedagogical agents/artefacts in teaching and learning, and their relation to open pedagogy. Specifically, we consider what aspects of the use and design of textbook may be rethought in the context of open pedagogy as increasingly ubiquitous access to knowledge and open licensing of content and data become more widely available. This is achieved by prompting educators to describe the best and worst features of the traditional textbook format and reflect on what they might imagine as a potential future for the textbook as a resource to support open pedagogy.
众包(非)教科书:对开放教学中教科书角色的反思与未来思考
在本文中,我们采用批判性的视角来调查教育工作者对传统教科书和替代教科书的理解,并研究开放教学法如何要求对教科书进行重新思考,以及如何在教学环境中使用教科书。在开放教学(包括开放教科书)的背景下,我们在2019年的三次会议期间举办了涉及教师、教学设计师、教育开发人员和学术管理人员的研讨会:爱尔兰戈尔韦举行的OER19会议;在不列颠哥伦比亚省温哥华举行的卡斯卡迪亚开放教育峰会;以及在不列颠哥伦比亚省坎卢普斯举行的教育技术用户小组会议。基于在这三个互动研讨会中收集的数据,结合项目发起者的个人反思,我们讨论了在教学和学习中使用教科书作为教学代理/人工制品的新问题和紧张局势,以及它们与开放教学法的关系。具体来说,我们考虑在开放教学的背景下,随着知识的日益普及和内容和数据的开放许可变得更加广泛,教科书的使用和设计的哪些方面可能需要重新考虑。这是通过促使教育工作者描述传统教科书格式的优点和缺点来实现的,并反思他们可能想象的教科书作为支持开放教学法的资源的潜在未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信