Longitudinal Evaluation of Software Quality Metrics in Open-Source Applications

A. Molnar, A. Neamţu, S. Motogna
{"title":"Longitudinal Evaluation of Software Quality Metrics in Open-Source Applications","authors":"A. Molnar, A. Neamţu, S. Motogna","doi":"10.5220/0007725600800091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Assessment of software quality remains the focus of important research efforts, with several proposed quality models and assessment methodologies. ISO 25010 describes software quality in terms of characteristics such as reliability, security or maintainability. In turn, these characteristics can be evaluated in terms of software metric values, establishing a relation between software metrics and quality. However, a general metric-based model for software quality does not yet exist. The diversity of software applications, metric definitions and differences between proposed quality models all contribute to this. Our paper proposes a longitudinal evaluation of the metric values and their relations in the context of three complex, open-source applications. We cover the entire 18 year development history of the targeted applications. We explore typical values for metrics associated with software product quality and explore their evolution in the context of software development. We identify dependant metrics and explore the effect class size has on the strength of dependencies. At each step, we compare the obtained results with relevant related work in order to contribute to a growing pool of evidence towards our goal - a metric-based evaluation of software quality characteristics.","PeriodicalId":420861,"journal":{"name":"International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Conference on Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5220/0007725600800091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

Assessment of software quality remains the focus of important research efforts, with several proposed quality models and assessment methodologies. ISO 25010 describes software quality in terms of characteristics such as reliability, security or maintainability. In turn, these characteristics can be evaluated in terms of software metric values, establishing a relation between software metrics and quality. However, a general metric-based model for software quality does not yet exist. The diversity of software applications, metric definitions and differences between proposed quality models all contribute to this. Our paper proposes a longitudinal evaluation of the metric values and their relations in the context of three complex, open-source applications. We cover the entire 18 year development history of the targeted applications. We explore typical values for metrics associated with software product quality and explore their evolution in the context of software development. We identify dependant metrics and explore the effect class size has on the strength of dependencies. At each step, we compare the obtained results with relevant related work in order to contribute to a growing pool of evidence towards our goal - a metric-based evaluation of software quality characteristics.
开源应用软件质量度量的纵向评价
软件质量评估仍然是重要研究工作的焦点,提出了几个质量模型和评估方法。ISO 25010从可靠性、安全性或可维护性等方面描述了软件质量。反过来,这些特征可以根据软件度量值进行评估,建立软件度量和质量之间的关系。然而,一个通用的基于度量的软件质量模型还不存在。软件应用程序的多样性、度量定义和所提议的质量模型之间的差异都促成了这一点。本文提出了在三个复杂的开源应用程序的背景下对度量值及其关系的纵向评估。我们涵盖了目标应用程序的整个18年的开发历史。我们探讨了与软件产品质量相关的度量标准的典型值,并探讨了它们在软件开发环境中的演变。我们确定了依赖度量,并探索了类大小对依赖强度的影响。在每一步中,我们将获得的结果与相关的工作进行比较,以便为我们的目标——基于度量的软件质量特征评估——提供越来越多的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信