Comparative study on calculation methods of stress in different sections of gravity dam

Hui Yu, C. Su, Linna Zheng, Lili Zhu
{"title":"Comparative study on calculation methods of stress in different sections of gravity dam","authors":"Hui Yu, C. Su, Linna Zheng, Lili Zhu","doi":"10.1109/ICHCESWIDR54323.2021.9656233","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to compare the difference between dam sections at different locations and different calculation models, this paper uses the material mechanics method, finite element independent dam section model and overall foundation model to compare different dam sections of gravity dams. The results show that for the riverbed dam section with a gentle foundation, the calculation results of the three methods are similar, and the vertical compressive stress difference at the heel of the dam is within 0.18 MPa. For the bank slope dam section, the calculation error of the material mechanics is relatively large. The vertical compressive stress at the heel of the dam is smaller than the result of the finite element method and can reach 4.67 MPa. The overall foundation model of the bank slope dam section has a larger tensile stress area, and the stress value increases up to 2.61 MPa. The vertical stress of the foundation surface of the bank slope dam section of the independent dam section model is the compressive stress, while the overall foundation model has tensile stress.","PeriodicalId":425834,"journal":{"name":"2021 7th International Conference on Hydraulic and Civil Engineering & Smart Water Conservancy and Intelligent Disaster Reduction Forum (ICHCE & SWIDR)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 7th International Conference on Hydraulic and Civil Engineering & Smart Water Conservancy and Intelligent Disaster Reduction Forum (ICHCE & SWIDR)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICHCESWIDR54323.2021.9656233","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In order to compare the difference between dam sections at different locations and different calculation models, this paper uses the material mechanics method, finite element independent dam section model and overall foundation model to compare different dam sections of gravity dams. The results show that for the riverbed dam section with a gentle foundation, the calculation results of the three methods are similar, and the vertical compressive stress difference at the heel of the dam is within 0.18 MPa. For the bank slope dam section, the calculation error of the material mechanics is relatively large. The vertical compressive stress at the heel of the dam is smaller than the result of the finite element method and can reach 4.67 MPa. The overall foundation model of the bank slope dam section has a larger tensile stress area, and the stress value increases up to 2.61 MPa. The vertical stress of the foundation surface of the bank slope dam section of the independent dam section model is the compressive stress, while the overall foundation model has tensile stress.
重力坝不同断面应力计算方法的比较研究
为了比较不同位置坝段和不同计算模型之间的差异,本文采用材料力学方法、有限元独立坝段模型和整体基础模型对重力坝不同坝段进行比较。结果表明:对于地基较缓的河床坝段,三种方法计算结果相似,坝跟处竖向压应力差在0.18 MPa以内;对于岸坡坝段,材料力学计算误差较大。坝体跟部竖向压应力较有限元计算结果较小,可达4.67 MPa。岸坡坝段整体基础模型拉应力面积较大,应力值增大至2.61 MPa。独立坝段模型中岸坡坝段地基面竖向应力为压应力,整体地基模型为拉应力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信