FEATURES OF PUBLIC OFFICIAL IN CRIMINAL LAW OF UKRAINE

O. Tsyvinskyi
{"title":"FEATURES OF PUBLIC OFFICIAL IN CRIMINAL LAW OF UKRAINE","authors":"O. Tsyvinskyi","doi":"10.32518/2617-4162-2021-2-113-120","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. In spite of definitude of the concept of public official directly in Criminal Code of Ukraine, its definition makes many difficulties. As the result there is an absence of the only approach concerning interpretation of context and amount of the concept in theory as well as ambiguous applying of relevant criminal and legal norms in enforcement practice. Purpose. The purpose of the article is to find out the subject matter of public official, as well as preparation of improvement of definition of the public official notion in criminal legislation. Results. Persons, that implement functions of a representative of authority or local self-administration, should also be referred as persons empowering the rights from state and its bodies; municipalities, bodies of local self-government make demands and solve problems, which are necessary for implementation by external respondents (entities, that are not subordinate by position and legal entities) and also implement from state, its bodies, bodies of local self-government enforcement measures in case of violations of legal norms. Organizational and regulatory functions should be exclusively considered as functions of administration working with employees that are implemented by person’s availability to make orders, instructions, commands, take encouragement and penalty measures referring to them. Administrative and economic functions should be perceived as functions of administration or disposal of other people’s property. Conclusion. Based on the research the author suggests to apply the defined term of public official instead of terms \"an individual fulfilling functions of representative of authority or local self-government\" \"organizational and regulatory function\" and \"administrative and economic functions\", terms \"an individual empowered fulfilling state functions or local self-government\", \"functions concerning administration of work with employees\" and \"functions of administration and disposal of other people’s property\" accordingly.","PeriodicalId":331578,"journal":{"name":"Social & Legal Studios","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social & Legal Studios","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32518/2617-4162-2021-2-113-120","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. In spite of definitude of the concept of public official directly in Criminal Code of Ukraine, its definition makes many difficulties. As the result there is an absence of the only approach concerning interpretation of context and amount of the concept in theory as well as ambiguous applying of relevant criminal and legal norms in enforcement practice. Purpose. The purpose of the article is to find out the subject matter of public official, as well as preparation of improvement of definition of the public official notion in criminal legislation. Results. Persons, that implement functions of a representative of authority or local self-administration, should also be referred as persons empowering the rights from state and its bodies; municipalities, bodies of local self-government make demands and solve problems, which are necessary for implementation by external respondents (entities, that are not subordinate by position and legal entities) and also implement from state, its bodies, bodies of local self-government enforcement measures in case of violations of legal norms. Organizational and regulatory functions should be exclusively considered as functions of administration working with employees that are implemented by person’s availability to make orders, instructions, commands, take encouragement and penalty measures referring to them. Administrative and economic functions should be perceived as functions of administration or disposal of other people’s property. Conclusion. Based on the research the author suggests to apply the defined term of public official instead of terms "an individual fulfilling functions of representative of authority or local self-government" "organizational and regulatory function" and "administrative and economic functions", terms "an individual empowered fulfilling state functions or local self-government", "functions concerning administration of work with employees" and "functions of administration and disposal of other people’s property" accordingly.
乌克兰刑法中公职人员的特征
介绍。尽管《乌克兰刑法典》直接明确了公职人员的概念,但其定义存在许多困难。其结果是,在理论上缺乏解释这一概念的背景和数量的唯一办法,在执行实践中也不明确地适用有关的刑事和法律规范。目的。本文的目的在于找出公职人员的主体,为完善刑事立法中公职人员概念的界定做准备。结果。执行当局代表或地方自治职能的人也应称为赋予国家及其机关权利的人;市政当局、地方自治机构提出要求和解决问题,这些要求和解决问题是外部回应者(不属于地位和法律实体的实体)执行所必需的,并且在违反法律规范的情况下,从国家、其机构、地方自治机构执行执行措施。组织和监管职能应完全被视为与员工一起工作的行政职能,这些职能是通过人员的可用性来执行的,以发出命令、指示、命令,并采取与之相关的鼓励和惩罚措施。行政和经济职能应被视为管理或处置他人财产的职能。结论。在研究的基础上,建议将“行使权力代表职能或地方自治职能的个人”、“组织和调节职能”、“行政和经济职能”、“被授权行使国家职能或地方自治职能的个人”等定义为“公职人员”。“与雇员有关的工作管理职能”和“管理和处置他人财产的职能”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信