Use of the Potential of Operational-Search Activities in Solving Problems Stages of Initiation of a Criminal Case: Problemic Issues of Theory and Practice

Y. Ryapolova
{"title":"Use of the Potential of Operational-Search Activities in Solving Problems Stages of Initiation of a Criminal Case: Problemic Issues of Theory and Practice","authors":"Y. Ryapolova","doi":"10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-6-132-142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Relevance. The article examines the main stages of the transformation of the legal model for initiating criminal cases on tax crimes, analyzes the changes introduced by Federal Law No. 51-FZ of 09.03.2022, returning a special “tax” reason to Article 140 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and adjusting the procedure for considering reports about the crime of the group in question. The problematic issues in the field of interaction between the preliminary investigation bodies and tax authorities in the course of identifying tax crimes and collecting the necessary evidence of the taxpayer's guilt are summarized. The purpose of this study is to study topical issues of improving the procedural form of receiving and verifying reports of crimes in the context of traditional approaches to tax administration. Objectives: analysis of the updated norms of tax and criminal procedural legislation, conceptual theoretical provisions that reflect the existing problems and contradictions in the legal regulation of the \"tax\" reason, its use in criminal procedural proof at the initial stage of the criminal process; development of proposals for optimization of criminal procedure legislation. Methodology. When writing the article, the method of legal modeling, as well as logical, statistical, historical, comparative legal and other methods were used. Results. The results of the study demonstrate the problems of legal regulation of the new procedure for initiating a criminal case on a tax crime and made it possible to formulate proposals for its improvement. Conclusion. Based on the results of the study, the author states a change in the legal model for initiating criminal prosecution of unscrupulous taxpayers, when the effectiveness of solving crimes is replaced by a risk-based approach in the field of detecting tax crimes. It demonstrates the lack of common views in the assessments of such innovations, taking into account the existing experience of applying such a procedure in 2011-2014, a contradictory understanding of the role of tax audit materials in shaping the reason and grounds for initiating a crimi","PeriodicalId":359562,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: History and Law","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1501-2022-12-6-132-142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Relevance. The article examines the main stages of the transformation of the legal model for initiating criminal cases on tax crimes, analyzes the changes introduced by Federal Law No. 51-FZ of 09.03.2022, returning a special “tax” reason to Article 140 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Russian Federation and adjusting the procedure for considering reports about the crime of the group in question. The problematic issues in the field of interaction between the preliminary investigation bodies and tax authorities in the course of identifying tax crimes and collecting the necessary evidence of the taxpayer's guilt are summarized. The purpose of this study is to study topical issues of improving the procedural form of receiving and verifying reports of crimes in the context of traditional approaches to tax administration. Objectives: analysis of the updated norms of tax and criminal procedural legislation, conceptual theoretical provisions that reflect the existing problems and contradictions in the legal regulation of the "tax" reason, its use in criminal procedural proof at the initial stage of the criminal process; development of proposals for optimization of criminal procedure legislation. Methodology. When writing the article, the method of legal modeling, as well as logical, statistical, historical, comparative legal and other methods were used. Results. The results of the study demonstrate the problems of legal regulation of the new procedure for initiating a criminal case on a tax crime and made it possible to formulate proposals for its improvement. Conclusion. Based on the results of the study, the author states a change in the legal model for initiating criminal prosecution of unscrupulous taxpayers, when the effectiveness of solving crimes is replaced by a risk-based approach in the field of detecting tax crimes. It demonstrates the lack of common views in the assessments of such innovations, taking into account the existing experience of applying such a procedure in 2011-2014, a contradictory understanding of the role of tax audit materials in shaping the reason and grounds for initiating a crimi
运用操作搜索活动的潜力解决刑事案件启动阶段的问题:理论与实践的问题
的相关性。本文考察了税收犯罪刑事诉讼法律模式转变的主要阶段,分析了2022年3月9日第51-FZ号联邦法所带来的变化,将特殊的“税收”理由回归到俄罗斯联邦刑事诉讼法第140条,并调整了审议有关集团犯罪报告的程序。总结了初查机关与税务机关在认定税收犯罪和收集纳税人犯罪必要证据过程中存在的互动问题。本研究的目的是研究在传统税务管理方法的背景下改进接收和核实犯罪报告的程序形式的专题问题。目的:分析最新的税收和刑事诉讼立法规范、概念理论规定,反映“税”在法律规制中存在的问题和矛盾的原因,探讨其在刑事诉讼初始阶段的刑事诉讼证明中的运用;提出优化刑事诉讼立法的建议。方法。在撰写文章时,运用了法律建模的方法,以及逻辑、统计、历史、比较法等方法。结果。这项研究的结果显示了对新的税务犯罪刑事诉讼程序的法律规制问题,并使提出改进建议成为可能。结论。根据研究结果,作者指出,在侦查税务犯罪领域,当解决犯罪的有效性被基于风险的方法所取代时,对无良纳税人提起刑事诉讼的法律模式发生了变化。考虑到2011-2014年应用此类程序的现有经验,它表明在评估此类创新方面缺乏共同观点,对税务审计材料在形成发起犯罪的原因和依据方面的作用的相互矛盾的理解
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信