Digital Replicas, Performers’ Livelihoods, and Sex Scenes: Likeness Rights for the 21st Century

Sarah Alex Howes
{"title":"Digital Replicas, Performers’ Livelihoods, and Sex Scenes: Likeness Rights for the 21st Century","authors":"Sarah Alex Howes","doi":"10.7916/JLA.V43I3.1995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I would like to thank June Besek and Columbia Law School for the opportunity to participate on this panel to discuss the appropriate breadth, waivability, and term of the right of publicity. New technologies and the fact that the New York bill will not go retroactive to protect already deceased performers has made this a more pressing issue that needs legal solutions, not just one. \nWhat should the right of publicity protect? The right of publicity is a property right that should protect rights to company branding, advertisements, merchandise, products, and professional performance. The right of privacy should protect against very real emotional harm caused by abusing a likeness; non-consensual sex scenes are certainly on my mind right now. \nThe Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) is a labor union, which means our primary mission is to ensure economic justice and fair and safe working conditions for our members. This union has pioneered protections for groups of artists and journalists once thought impossible. We fight for good union contracts, marketplace rights, child protections, general safety, and laws and regulations to prevent or stop unethical industry practices. It should come as no surprise that the union is experiencing attacks on union contracts, organizing, basic consent on the internet, and intellectual properties generally. Unfortunately, as a result, this union has to sometimes question the bounds of the First Amendment in this digital era. SAG-AFTRA represents a broad swath of creators. We represent film actors, program hosts, recording artists, singers, voiceover artists, online influencers, and other media professionals. This union also belongs to an image rights coalition made up of other unions and organizations representing entertainers. \n \n \n \nI have the honor of representing 160,000 entertainers and journalists who also happen to be public figures. These are public figures who want to protect their families and possess a degree of control over how their likeness is used in the marketplace. No SAG-AFTRA member is the same; we represent 160,000 unique individuals with different business objectives, views, and priorities when it comes to likeness rights. That being said, not one single performer we have spoken to wants their likeness to enter the public domain upon death. The right of publicity and rights to digital replicas have long been a priority for the union. SAG-AFTRA members desire autonomy over their legacy and career. If there is a value to a likeness after death, their family, close friends, or a designated charity should receive the fruits of their labors. It is also worth noting that some of our members want to be excluded from commercial exploitation altogether. For example, news broadcasters are concerned their reputations as journalists would be significantly harmed if ever associated with a company or put on a T-shirt or on a doll. \nSAG-AFTRA members work hard to achieve any amount of marketplace value in the entertainment industry. Our members often self-subsidize much of their training and arts experience to be the talented individuals you see at concerts, on Broadway stages, and in the movies. Image and voice rights are essential components of a functional modern marketplace that returns value to labor. Value is not simply measured by celebrity gossip magazines or a large online following. Value may be a certain look, a certain voice, or one extraordinary performance or song that sticks with us. There is undeniable value to images and voices and so the question becomes, who should benefit from this value? A family or a corporation? Or, if there is consent, how about both? That seems like a win-win.","PeriodicalId":222420,"journal":{"name":"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Columbia Journal of Law and the Arts","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7916/JLA.V43I3.1995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

I would like to thank June Besek and Columbia Law School for the opportunity to participate on this panel to discuss the appropriate breadth, waivability, and term of the right of publicity. New technologies and the fact that the New York bill will not go retroactive to protect already deceased performers has made this a more pressing issue that needs legal solutions, not just one. What should the right of publicity protect? The right of publicity is a property right that should protect rights to company branding, advertisements, merchandise, products, and professional performance. The right of privacy should protect against very real emotional harm caused by abusing a likeness; non-consensual sex scenes are certainly on my mind right now. The Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists (SAG-AFTRA) is a labor union, which means our primary mission is to ensure economic justice and fair and safe working conditions for our members. This union has pioneered protections for groups of artists and journalists once thought impossible. We fight for good union contracts, marketplace rights, child protections, general safety, and laws and regulations to prevent or stop unethical industry practices. It should come as no surprise that the union is experiencing attacks on union contracts, organizing, basic consent on the internet, and intellectual properties generally. Unfortunately, as a result, this union has to sometimes question the bounds of the First Amendment in this digital era. SAG-AFTRA represents a broad swath of creators. We represent film actors, program hosts, recording artists, singers, voiceover artists, online influencers, and other media professionals. This union also belongs to an image rights coalition made up of other unions and organizations representing entertainers. I have the honor of representing 160,000 entertainers and journalists who also happen to be public figures. These are public figures who want to protect their families and possess a degree of control over how their likeness is used in the marketplace. No SAG-AFTRA member is the same; we represent 160,000 unique individuals with different business objectives, views, and priorities when it comes to likeness rights. That being said, not one single performer we have spoken to wants their likeness to enter the public domain upon death. The right of publicity and rights to digital replicas have long been a priority for the union. SAG-AFTRA members desire autonomy over their legacy and career. If there is a value to a likeness after death, their family, close friends, or a designated charity should receive the fruits of their labors. It is also worth noting that some of our members want to be excluded from commercial exploitation altogether. For example, news broadcasters are concerned their reputations as journalists would be significantly harmed if ever associated with a company or put on a T-shirt or on a doll. SAG-AFTRA members work hard to achieve any amount of marketplace value in the entertainment industry. Our members often self-subsidize much of their training and arts experience to be the talented individuals you see at concerts, on Broadway stages, and in the movies. Image and voice rights are essential components of a functional modern marketplace that returns value to labor. Value is not simply measured by celebrity gossip magazines or a large online following. Value may be a certain look, a certain voice, or one extraordinary performance or song that sticks with us. There is undeniable value to images and voices and so the question becomes, who should benefit from this value? A family or a corporation? Or, if there is consent, how about both? That seems like a win-win.
数字复制品、表演者的生计和性爱场景:21世纪的肖像权
我要感谢June Besek和哥伦比亚大学法学院让我有机会参加这个小组讨论公开权的适当广度,可放弃性和期限。新技术的出现,加上纽约的法案不会溯及既往地保护已经去世的表演者,使得这个问题变得更加紧迫,需要法律解决,而不仅仅是一个。形象权应该保护什么?形象权是一项财产权,应保护公司品牌、广告、商品、产品和专业表演等权利。隐私权应防止滥用肖像造成非常真实的情感伤害;不经双方同意的性爱场面现在肯定在我脑海里。美国演员工会-美国电视和广播艺术家联合会(SAG-AFTRA)是一个工会,这意味着我们的主要任务是为我们的成员确保经济正义、公平和安全的工作条件。这个工会开创了保护曾经被认为不可能的艺术家和记者群体的先路。我们为良好的工会合同、市场权利、儿童保护、一般安全以及法律法规而斗争,以防止或制止不道德的行业行为。工会在工会合同、组织、互联网上的基本同意和知识产权方面受到攻击,这不足为奇。不幸的是,在这个数字时代,这个联盟有时不得不质疑第一修正案的界限。SAG-AFTRA代表了广泛的创作者。我们代表电影演员、节目主持人、录音艺术家、歌手、配音艺术家、网络影响者和其他媒体专业人士。这个工会也是由其他艺人工会和团体组成的形象权联盟的成员。我有幸代表16万名艺人和记者,他们也是公众人物。这些公众人物想要保护他们的家庭,并对他们的肖像在市场上的使用拥有一定程度的控制权。没有一个SAG-AFTRA成员是相同的;当涉及到肖像权时,我们代表着16万名拥有不同商业目标、观点和优先事项的个人。话虽如此,我们采访过的演员中没有一个希望他们的肖像在死后进入公共领域。宣传权和数字复制品的权利长期以来一直是工会的优先事项。SAG-AFTRA成员希望对他们的遗产和职业有自主权。如果肖像在死后有价值,他们的家人、亲密的朋友或指定的慈善机构应该得到他们劳动的成果。同样值得注意的是,我们的一些成员希望完全被排除在商业开发之外。例如,新闻广播公司担心,如果与公司有关联,或者穿上t恤或玩偶,他们作为记者的声誉将受到严重损害。SAG-AFTRA成员努力在娱乐行业实现任何数量的市场价值。我们的会员经常自费大部分培训和艺术经验,以成为你在音乐会、百老汇舞台和电影中看到的有才华的人。形象权和话语权是一个功能完善的现代市场的重要组成部分,它将价值归还给劳动。价值不是简单地用名人八卦杂志或大量的网络粉丝来衡量的。价值可能是某种外表,某种声音,或者是一种让我们难忘的非凡表演或歌曲。图像和声音具有不可否认的价值,所以问题就变成了,谁应该从这种价值中受益?一个家庭还是一个公司?或者,如果双方都同意,那又如何呢?这似乎是双赢。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信