Assessing the Efficacy of Group Work Using a Group Work Assessment Framework

Karma Utha
{"title":"Assessing the Efficacy of Group Work Using a Group Work Assessment Framework","authors":"Karma Utha","doi":"10.17102/bjrd.rub.12.1.0022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Group work as a learning activity in education is to enhance students’ content knowledge and develop social skills. The minimal individual and group accountability has often led to only a few students working towards achieving the group goals. Research has suggested taking care of the task design and assessment to achieve the efficacy of group work. Towards this, a Group Work Assessment Framework (GAF) is proposed. The GAF consists of a detailed roadmap of planning, implementation, and assessment taking into account the task design and assessment with specific guidelines for teachers and students. A participatory design to develop and implement the GAF was applied. Six tutors as designers and 11 tutors as implementors were involved. A total of 221 students and 8 tutors participated in the survey and interviews. The findings indicate that GAF enhanced individual and group accountability. The assessment of the group work was found to be fair as each student was marked based on his/her contribution and collaboration using evidence like meeting minutes, meeting attendance, recording, and student consultation. The study findings may provide an empirical base for policy directives to implement GAF in higher education to enhance students’ learning and develop social skills. A study may be carried out after a few cycles of implementation for any revision in the GAF.","PeriodicalId":244206,"journal":{"name":"Bhutan Journal of Research and Development","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bhutan Journal of Research and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17102/bjrd.rub.12.1.0022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Group work as a learning activity in education is to enhance students’ content knowledge and develop social skills. The minimal individual and group accountability has often led to only a few students working towards achieving the group goals. Research has suggested taking care of the task design and assessment to achieve the efficacy of group work. Towards this, a Group Work Assessment Framework (GAF) is proposed. The GAF consists of a detailed roadmap of planning, implementation, and assessment taking into account the task design and assessment with specific guidelines for teachers and students. A participatory design to develop and implement the GAF was applied. Six tutors as designers and 11 tutors as implementors were involved. A total of 221 students and 8 tutors participated in the survey and interviews. The findings indicate that GAF enhanced individual and group accountability. The assessment of the group work was found to be fair as each student was marked based on his/her contribution and collaboration using evidence like meeting minutes, meeting attendance, recording, and student consultation. The study findings may provide an empirical base for policy directives to implement GAF in higher education to enhance students’ learning and develop social skills. A study may be carried out after a few cycles of implementation for any revision in the GAF.
使用小组工作评估框架评估小组工作的效能
小组作业作为教育中的一种学习活动,其目的是增强学生的内容知识,发展学生的社交技能。极少的个人和小组责任往往导致只有少数学生努力实现小组目标。研究建议注意任务的设计和评估,以达到小组工作的效果。为此,提出了一个小组工作评估框架(GAF)。GAF包括详细的规划、实施和评估路线图,考虑到任务设计和评估,并为教师和学生提供具体的指导方针。采用参与式设计来开发和实施GAF。6名导师作为设计师,11名导师作为实施者。共有221名学生和8名导师参与了调查和访谈。研究结果表明,GAF提高了个人和团体的问责制。小组作业的评估被认为是公平的,因为每个学生都是根据他/她的贡献和合作进行评分的,并使用会议记录、会议出席率、录音和学生咨询等证据。研究结果可为在高等教育中实施GAF以促进学生学习和发展社交技能的政策指导提供实证依据。对于GAF的任何修订,可在实施几个周期后进行研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信