Nonlinear versus linear recursion: a perspective from computing transitive closures of a binary relation by the join domain nested loops approach

P. Chang
{"title":"Nonlinear versus linear recursion: a perspective from computing transitive closures of a binary relation by the join domain nested loops approach","authors":"P. Chang","doi":"10.1109/CMPSAC.1990.139388","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The author considers a more general class of transitive closure of a binary relation by relaxing the linear variable binding of the original transitive closure. A syntactical (i.e. grammatical) approach is used to analyze the properties of this class of recursive rules. The existing directed algorithms for computing the (standard) transitive closure of a binary relation actually compute a nonlinear recursion. In recursive query processing, linear recursion was 'preferred to' nonlinear recursion probably because of the lack of efficient algorithms for computing nonlinear recursion rather than because linear recursion is more likely to occur than nonlinear recursion. A linear transitive closure is semantically subsumed by its corresponding nonlinear transitive closure. The author provides counter-evidence through the worst case analysis of computing nonstandard transitive closures to show that computing nonlinear recursive rules is simpler than computing linear ones by using the join domain nested loops approach, even though linear recursive transitive closure is semantically subsumed by its corresponding nonlinear recursive transitive closure.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":127509,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings., Fourteenth Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings., Fourteenth Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CMPSAC.1990.139388","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The author considers a more general class of transitive closure of a binary relation by relaxing the linear variable binding of the original transitive closure. A syntactical (i.e. grammatical) approach is used to analyze the properties of this class of recursive rules. The existing directed algorithms for computing the (standard) transitive closure of a binary relation actually compute a nonlinear recursion. In recursive query processing, linear recursion was 'preferred to' nonlinear recursion probably because of the lack of efficient algorithms for computing nonlinear recursion rather than because linear recursion is more likely to occur than nonlinear recursion. A linear transitive closure is semantically subsumed by its corresponding nonlinear transitive closure. The author provides counter-evidence through the worst case analysis of computing nonstandard transitive closures to show that computing nonlinear recursive rules is simpler than computing linear ones by using the join domain nested loops approach, even though linear recursive transitive closure is semantically subsumed by its corresponding nonlinear recursive transitive closure.<>
非线性与线性递归:通过连接域嵌套循环方法计算二元关系的传递闭包的视角
通过放宽原始传递闭包的线性变量绑定,考虑了二元关系的传递闭包的更一般的一类。使用句法(即语法)方法来分析这类递归规则的属性。现有的用于计算二元关系的(标准)传递闭包的有向算法实际上计算的是非线性递归。在递归查询处理中,线性递归比非线性递归更受青睐,可能是因为缺乏计算非线性递归的有效算法,而不是因为线性递归比非线性递归更容易发生。线性传递闭包在语义上被其对应的非线性传递闭包所包含。作者通过计算非标准递归闭包的最坏情况分析提供了反证据,表明使用连接域嵌套循环方法计算非线性递归规则比计算线性递归规则更简单,即使线性递归传递闭包在语义上被其相应的非线性递归传递闭包所包含。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信