THE EFFECT OF SEMANTIC MAPPING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION AT THE NINTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP RAKSANA MEDAN

Resniaty Situmorang
{"title":"THE EFFECT OF SEMANTIC MAPPING STRATEGY ON STUDENTS’ READING COMPREHENSION AT THE NINTH GRADE STUDENTS OF SMP RAKSANA MEDAN","authors":"Resniaty Situmorang","doi":"10.54367/kairos.v1i2.503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research is aimed to investigate the effect of semantic mapping strategy on students’reading comprehension of narrative text and the significant different on readingcomprehension of narrative text between two groups: who are teach using semanticmapping strategy and those who are teach using conventional method. The design of thestudy is experimental study. The population of this study is the ninth grade students of SMPRaksana Medan in the academic year of 2014/2015. The number of the subjects is 60students. The data are obtained by administering reading test to the IX-1 as experimentalgroup and IX-2 as control group. The research is started by giving pre-test, treatment andpost-test to both experimental and control groups. The data of the test are analyzed by using t-test formula to know the difference of the students’ comprehension in reading narrative text between two groups. In the pre-test the mean score of the experimental group is 54 and the control group is 53.67. The result of post-test of the experimental group is 78.33 and the control group is 67.5. The result of the t-test of mean difference is 3.046 and t- table is 2.00 It means that t-value is higher than t-table (3.046 >2.00). The calculation revealed that the hypothesis about a significant difference on reading comprehension between students who are teach narrative text by using semantic mapping strategy and those who are taught by using conventional method is accepted. It can be concluded that Semantic Mapping Strategy worked effectively to help students increase their achievement in reading comprehension. It is suggested that teachers of English apply Semantic Mapping Strategy as one of the alternatives in teaching reading comprehension.","PeriodicalId":184113,"journal":{"name":"Kairos English Language Teaching Journal","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kairos English Language Teaching Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54367/kairos.v1i2.503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research is aimed to investigate the effect of semantic mapping strategy on students’reading comprehension of narrative text and the significant different on readingcomprehension of narrative text between two groups: who are teach using semanticmapping strategy and those who are teach using conventional method. The design of thestudy is experimental study. The population of this study is the ninth grade students of SMPRaksana Medan in the academic year of 2014/2015. The number of the subjects is 60students. The data are obtained by administering reading test to the IX-1 as experimentalgroup and IX-2 as control group. The research is started by giving pre-test, treatment andpost-test to both experimental and control groups. The data of the test are analyzed by using t-test formula to know the difference of the students’ comprehension in reading narrative text between two groups. In the pre-test the mean score of the experimental group is 54 and the control group is 53.67. The result of post-test of the experimental group is 78.33 and the control group is 67.5. The result of the t-test of mean difference is 3.046 and t- table is 2.00 It means that t-value is higher than t-table (3.046 >2.00). The calculation revealed that the hypothesis about a significant difference on reading comprehension between students who are teach narrative text by using semantic mapping strategy and those who are taught by using conventional method is accepted. It can be concluded that Semantic Mapping Strategy worked effectively to help students increase their achievement in reading comprehension. It is suggested that teachers of English apply Semantic Mapping Strategy as one of the alternatives in teaching reading comprehension.
语义映射策略对九年级学生阅读理解的影响
本研究旨在探讨语义映射策略对学生叙事文本阅读理解的影响,以及语义映射策略教学组和传统方法教学组在叙事文本阅读理解上的显著差异。本研究的设计为实验研究。本研究的人群为棉兰SMPRaksana学校2014/2015学年的九年级学生。科目的数量是60名学生。数据通过对IX-1为实验组,IX-2为对照组进行阅读测试获得。这项研究首先对实验组和对照组进行了前测试、治疗和后测试。通过using t检验公式对测试数据进行分析,了解两组学生在阅读narrativeÂ文本时€™理解的差异。前测中,实验组平均得分为54 andÂ,对照组平均得分为53.67。实验组的后测结果为78.33 andÂ,对照组为67.5。均数差的t检验结果为3.046,t-table is 2.00说明t值高于t-table(3.046 >2.00)。计算结果表明thatÂ采用语义映射策略进行叙事文本教学的studentsÂ学生与采用常规方法进行叙事文本教学的taughtÂ学生在阅读理解上存在显著差异的假设被接受。由此可见,语义MappingÂ策略能够有效地帮助学生提高readingÂ的理解成绩。建议英语教师将语义映射StrategyÂ作为阅读理解教学的替代方法之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信