{"title":"VoIP performance evaluation over IPv4-6 and manually configured tunnels","authors":"Poussy A. Amr, Nashwa Abdelbaki","doi":"10.1109/IWMN.2013.6663789","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"IPv4 address space is exhausted. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) developed IPv6 -the upgrade of IPv4- to satisfy the continual increase of the IP address needs. The Internet is so ramified and enormous that the complete transition from IPv4 to IPv6 is slow. Therefore, their coexistence is inevitable. Manually configured tunnels are an important solution to allow this co-existence that allows transmitting native IPv6 packets over IPv4 networks. Meanwhile, VoIP is also gaining momentum with expectation to occupy considerable percentage of Internet traffic. In this paper, we compare the Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) network performance delivering Real-Time Quality-of-Service over manually configured tunnels versus conventional IPv4 and IPv6 networks. The measurements are collected out of probing a single call transferred over a network congested with HTTP, FTP or Video. The comparison performance criteria are jitter, network delay, throughput and packet loss percentage. Also the call user satisfaction is assessed by Mean Opinion Score.","PeriodicalId":218660,"journal":{"name":"2013 IEEE International Workshop on Measurements & Networking (M&N)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-11-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2013 IEEE International Workshop on Measurements & Networking (M&N)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IWMN.2013.6663789","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
IPv4 address space is exhausted. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) developed IPv6 -the upgrade of IPv4- to satisfy the continual increase of the IP address needs. The Internet is so ramified and enormous that the complete transition from IPv4 to IPv6 is slow. Therefore, their coexistence is inevitable. Manually configured tunnels are an important solution to allow this co-existence that allows transmitting native IPv6 packets over IPv4 networks. Meanwhile, VoIP is also gaining momentum with expectation to occupy considerable percentage of Internet traffic. In this paper, we compare the Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) network performance delivering Real-Time Quality-of-Service over manually configured tunnels versus conventional IPv4 and IPv6 networks. The measurements are collected out of probing a single call transferred over a network congested with HTTP, FTP or Video. The comparison performance criteria are jitter, network delay, throughput and packet loss percentage. Also the call user satisfaction is assessed by Mean Opinion Score.
IPv4地址空间耗尽。处理步骤Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)开发了IPv4的升级版IPv6,以满足不断增长的IP地址需求。互联网是如此分散和庞大,从IPv4到IPv6的完全过渡是缓慢的。因此,两者共存是不可避免的。手动配置隧道是允许这种共存的重要解决方案,允许在IPv4网络上传输本地IPv6数据包。与此同时,VoIP也在获得动力,预计将占据相当大比例的互联网流量。在本文中,我们比较了通过手动配置隧道提供实时服务质量的互联网协议语音(VoIP)网络性能与传统的IPv4和IPv6网络。这些测量是通过探测通过HTTP、FTP或视频拥塞的网络传输的单个呼叫来收集的。比较性能标准是抖动、网络延迟、吞吐量和丢包率。此外,呼叫用户满意度的评估是平均意见得分。