Effectiveness of Dexamethasone compared with Prednisolone in Induction Therapy of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia

Tofazzal Hossain, M. Mannan, S. Nahar, A. Morshed, S. Islam, L. Helaly
{"title":"Effectiveness of Dexamethasone compared with Prednisolone in Induction Therapy of Childhood Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia","authors":"Tofazzal Hossain, M. Mannan, S. Nahar, A. Morshed, S. Islam, L. Helaly","doi":"10.3329/JPSB.V6I1.27740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Corticosteroids are an essential component of treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Prednisolone is the most commonly used steroid. There is increasing evidence that, even in equipotent dosage for glucocorticoid effect, dexamethasone has enhanced lymphoblast cytotoxicity and penetration of central nervous system compared with prednisolone. Objectives: To determine the effect of dexamethasone and prednisolone and to compare them in induction therapy of ALL in Children. Material & Methods: A total of 60 newly diagnosed cases of ALL confirmed by bone marrow study, children of either sex with age >1 year were included in this study. Variables studied were age, sex, presenting features, neutrophil count, blast cell count, platelet count, bone marrow status at diagnosis, on D15 & D29 of induction and side effects. Results: Mean age of the patients of group A was 6.28 years & that of group B was 7.2 years. Out of all patients of group A 19 (63.3%) were male and 11 (36.7%) were female. In group B 21 (70.0%) patients were male and rests 9 (30.3%) were female. No statistically significant difference was observed in both groups in terms of age, sex & presenting features. After induction significant difference was observed in liver & spleen size at day 7 and day 15. All patients of both groups had M3 marrow status at diagnosis. Overall, in group A 93.3% patients achieved M1 marrow status (fewer than 5% blasts) and 6.7% had M2 marrow status (5-25% blasts) at day 15 of induction. On the other side 66.7% patients of group B achieved M1 status and 33.3% M2 status at day 15. Statistically significant difference was observed between groups on day 15 in term of achieved marrow status (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed between groups in term of infection in difference days of induction. On day 16 of induction maximum incidence of infection was observed in both groups. Conclusion: Dexamethasone may be an effective alternative option to prednisolone for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. J. Paediatr. Surg. Bangladesh 6 (1): 3-9, 2015 (Jan)","PeriodicalId":137868,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Paediatric Surgeons of Bangladesh","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Paediatric Surgeons of Bangladesh","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/JPSB.V6I1.27740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Corticosteroids are an essential component of treatment for acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Prednisolone is the most commonly used steroid. There is increasing evidence that, even in equipotent dosage for glucocorticoid effect, dexamethasone has enhanced lymphoblast cytotoxicity and penetration of central nervous system compared with prednisolone. Objectives: To determine the effect of dexamethasone and prednisolone and to compare them in induction therapy of ALL in Children. Material & Methods: A total of 60 newly diagnosed cases of ALL confirmed by bone marrow study, children of either sex with age >1 year were included in this study. Variables studied were age, sex, presenting features, neutrophil count, blast cell count, platelet count, bone marrow status at diagnosis, on D15 & D29 of induction and side effects. Results: Mean age of the patients of group A was 6.28 years & that of group B was 7.2 years. Out of all patients of group A 19 (63.3%) were male and 11 (36.7%) were female. In group B 21 (70.0%) patients were male and rests 9 (30.3%) were female. No statistically significant difference was observed in both groups in terms of age, sex & presenting features. After induction significant difference was observed in liver & spleen size at day 7 and day 15. All patients of both groups had M3 marrow status at diagnosis. Overall, in group A 93.3% patients achieved M1 marrow status (fewer than 5% blasts) and 6.7% had M2 marrow status (5-25% blasts) at day 15 of induction. On the other side 66.7% patients of group B achieved M1 status and 33.3% M2 status at day 15. Statistically significant difference was observed between groups on day 15 in term of achieved marrow status (p<0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed between groups in term of infection in difference days of induction. On day 16 of induction maximum incidence of infection was observed in both groups. Conclusion: Dexamethasone may be an effective alternative option to prednisolone for the treatment of acute lymphoblastic leukemia in children. J. Paediatr. Surg. Bangladesh 6 (1): 3-9, 2015 (Jan)
地塞米松与强的松龙诱导治疗儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病的疗效比较
背景:皮质类固醇是急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)治疗的重要组成部分。强的松龙是最常用的类固醇。越来越多的证据表明,即使在糖皮质激素作用的等效剂量下,与强的松龙相比,地塞米松也增强了淋巴细胞毒性和对中枢神经系统的渗透。目的:观察地塞米松与强的松龙在小儿急性淋巴细胞白血病诱导治疗中的疗效,并进行比较。材料与方法:本研究共纳入60例经骨髓检查证实的ALL新诊断病例,年龄为bb0 ~ 1岁,男女不限。研究的变量包括年龄、性别、表现特征、中性粒细胞计数、母细胞计数、血小板计数、诊断时骨髓状态、诱导的D15和D29及副作用。结果:A组患者平均年龄6.28岁,B组患者平均年龄7.2岁。A组患者中男性19例(63.3%),女性11例(36.7%)。B组男性21例(70.0%),女性9例(30.3%)。两组患者在年龄、性别及表现特征上无统计学差异。诱导后第7天和第15天肝脏和脾脏大小差异显著。两组患者诊断时骨髓状态均为M3。总体而言,在A组中,93.3%的患者在诱导第15天达到M1骨髓状态(少于5%的细胞),6.7%的患者达到M2骨髓状态(5-25%的细胞)。另一方面,B组66.7%的患者在15天达到M1状态,33.3%的患者达到M2状态。第15天各组间骨髓状态差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。诱导后不同天数组间感染情况差异无统计学意义。两组感染发生率均在诱导第16天达到最高值。结论:地塞米松可能是强的松龙治疗儿童急性淋巴细胞白血病的有效替代方案。j . Paediatr。孟加拉外科杂志6(1):2015年1月3-9日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信