The return of geography

Paul Dibb
{"title":"The return of geography","authors":"Paul Dibb","doi":"10.22459/NDST.07.2018.08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The title of this chapter might suggest that geography has somehow gone missing in action as a body of strategic knowledge. While it is true that some theoreticians bought the superficial view at the end of the Cold War that geography had had its day, that was never the view of those of us who were senior defence policy officers. Strategic theories come and go, but the abiding nature of a nation’s geography remains a key defence planning tool. Indeed, I would agree with Australia’s greatest Secretary for Defence, Sir Arthur Tange, who said in 1986: ‘The map of one’s own country is the most fundamental of all defence documentation.’1 He also presciently asserted that the nature of Australia’s physical environment demands that maritime capabilities occupy a prominent place in defence.2","PeriodicalId":346795,"journal":{"name":"New Directions in Strategic Thinking 2.0: ANU Strategic & Defence Studies Centre's Golden Anniversary Conference Proceedings","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Directions in Strategic Thinking 2.0: ANU Strategic & Defence Studies Centre's Golden Anniversary Conference Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22459/NDST.07.2018.08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The title of this chapter might suggest that geography has somehow gone missing in action as a body of strategic knowledge. While it is true that some theoreticians bought the superficial view at the end of the Cold War that geography had had its day, that was never the view of those of us who were senior defence policy officers. Strategic theories come and go, but the abiding nature of a nation’s geography remains a key defence planning tool. Indeed, I would agree with Australia’s greatest Secretary for Defence, Sir Arthur Tange, who said in 1986: ‘The map of one’s own country is the most fundamental of all defence documentation.’1 He also presciently asserted that the nature of Australia’s physical environment demands that maritime capabilities occupy a prominent place in defence.2
地理学的回归
本章的标题可能暗示,地理学作为一门战略知识,在实际行动中不知何故消失了。的确,一些理论家在冷战结束时接受了地理学已经风光不再的肤浅观点,但我们这些高级国防政策官员从来都不这么认为。战略理论来来去去,但一个国家地理的持久特性仍然是一个关键的国防规划工具。的确,我同意澳大利亚最伟大的国防部长阿瑟·丹格爵士在1986年说过的话:“一个人自己国家的地图是所有国防文件中最基本的。”他还有先见之明地断言,澳大利亚的自然环境要求海上能力在国防中占据突出地位
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信