{"title":"Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Law Practice in Africa","authors":"Ademola Adeyoju","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3301937","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Law is the only self-regulated profession on earth. It has not changed much since the industrial revolution. \n \nIt enjoys substantial immunity from outside challengers, particularly in comparison to other professions. This immunity is safeguarded by the enactment of protectionist professional rules and guidelines which govern civility, ethics, and protect lawyers from overthrow. But it appears very likely that law — though shielded by regulations and imbued in tradition — might not be able to withstand the sweeping influence of the digital revolution for long. “Carefully erected protections sheltering the legal profession from disruption is now being eroded”, and the foundation of the monopoly over legal work and the ‘practice of law’ is beginning to crumble. \n \nTraditionally and historically, only lawyers can legally engage in the practice of law. But things are beginning to change. In the landmark case of Lola v Skadden, the Court held that “tasks that could otherwise be performed entirely by a machine cannot be said to engage in the practice of law,” meaning that once some task can be entirely performed by a machine, that task can no longer be considered to be ‘the practice of law’ \n \nJust as Salomon v Salomon revolutionized corporate law, the decision in Lola v Skadden may soon spark a global trend. Predictions already abound. According to Deloitte, over 100,000 thousand jobs will be automated in the legal sector in the UK alone by 2025, and companies that fail to adopt AI are fated to be left behind. Law is no longer safe from AI. And a single rock from the agile and fluid AI’s sling may knock down the highly regulated, heavily armored, and greatly encumbered legal profession.","PeriodicalId":180020,"journal":{"name":"IRPN: Other Innovation & Law & Policy (Topic)","volume":"77 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IRPN: Other Innovation & Law & Policy (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3301937","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
Law is the only self-regulated profession on earth. It has not changed much since the industrial revolution.
It enjoys substantial immunity from outside challengers, particularly in comparison to other professions. This immunity is safeguarded by the enactment of protectionist professional rules and guidelines which govern civility, ethics, and protect lawyers from overthrow. But it appears very likely that law — though shielded by regulations and imbued in tradition — might not be able to withstand the sweeping influence of the digital revolution for long. “Carefully erected protections sheltering the legal profession from disruption is now being eroded”, and the foundation of the monopoly over legal work and the ‘practice of law’ is beginning to crumble.
Traditionally and historically, only lawyers can legally engage in the practice of law. But things are beginning to change. In the landmark case of Lola v Skadden, the Court held that “tasks that could otherwise be performed entirely by a machine cannot be said to engage in the practice of law,” meaning that once some task can be entirely performed by a machine, that task can no longer be considered to be ‘the practice of law’
Just as Salomon v Salomon revolutionized corporate law, the decision in Lola v Skadden may soon spark a global trend. Predictions already abound. According to Deloitte, over 100,000 thousand jobs will be automated in the legal sector in the UK alone by 2025, and companies that fail to adopt AI are fated to be left behind. Law is no longer safe from AI. And a single rock from the agile and fluid AI’s sling may knock down the highly regulated, heavily armored, and greatly encumbered legal profession.
法律是世界上唯一自律的职业。自工业革命以来,它没有太大变化。与其他职业相比,它在很大程度上不受外部挑战者的影响。通过制定保护主义的专业规则和指导方针来保障这种豁免,这些规则和指导方针规范了礼貌、道德,并保护律师不被推翻。但很有可能的是,法律——尽管受到监管和传统的保护——可能无法长期承受数字革命的广泛影响。“精心建立的保护法律职业免受破坏的保护措施现在正在受到侵蚀”,对法律工作和“法律实践”的垄断基础开始崩溃。传统上和历史上,只有律师才能合法地从事法律实践。但情况开始发生变化。在具有里程碑意义的洛拉诉世达案(Lola v Skadden)中,最高法院认为,“原本可以完全由机器执行的任务不能被称为从事法律实践”,这意味着,一旦某些任务可以完全由机器执行,该任务就不能再被视为“法律实践”。正如所罗门诉所罗门(Salomon v . Salomon)案彻底改变了公司法一样,洛拉诉世达案的裁决可能很快引发一种全球趋势。预测已经很多了。据德勤(Deloitte)称,到2025年,仅在英国的法律行业,就将有超过10万个工作岗位实现自动化,而未能采用人工智能的公司注定会被甩在后面。法律在人工智能面前不再安全。敏捷而流畅的人工智能投下的一块石头可能会击倒高度监管、全副武装、步履维艰的法律职业。