{"title":"Accounting for Risk: The Advent of Capped Conveyancing Title Insurance","authors":"L. Griggs, R. Low, Rod Thomas","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3325567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Title insurance companies originating from America, have, in the past \n15 years become part of the Australian conveyancing landscape. However \nfor most residential freehold owners, their activities would be a mystery. A \npurchaser does not routinely obtain title insurance, with the companies \npresently focussing on servicing the mortgagee sector. While the lack of \npenetration in the residential purchaser market may be attributed to the \nconsumer’s lack of knowledge, evidence from Ontario and New Zealand \nillustrates that title insurance is likely to become an additional cost in the \nconveyancing process in Australia. In this article we highlight the reasons \nwhy, and demonstrate how title insurers have, by working with the legal \nprofession been able to subtly move the risk of responsibility for \ncompensation for loss, (at least in the first instance) from the state to the \ninsurer, but with the added benefit for the state and the conveyancing agents \nthat the cost of the insurance is ultimately borne by the consumer. In New \nZealand this development is being accelerated by the introduction of capped \nconveyancing title insurance. Whether title insurance will become part of the \nconveyancing process is no longer the relevant question for Australia, (it \nundoubtedly will), but the unknown issue is just how title insurance \ncompanies will work with conveyancing agents to infiltrate the market, and \nwhat response this infiltration will have in terms of the state’s view as to their \ncontinued role in the provision of assurance. We suggest that developments \nfrom New Zealand in relation to capped conveyancing insurance are likely to \nbe replicated in Australia in the near future, and that the state’s role in \nproviding an assurance fund will continue, though the state may seek to \nexpand the areas in which the right to compensation is restricted.","PeriodicalId":214408,"journal":{"name":"Australian property law journal","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian property law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3325567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
Title insurance companies originating from America, have, in the past
15 years become part of the Australian conveyancing landscape. However
for most residential freehold owners, their activities would be a mystery. A
purchaser does not routinely obtain title insurance, with the companies
presently focussing on servicing the mortgagee sector. While the lack of
penetration in the residential purchaser market may be attributed to the
consumer’s lack of knowledge, evidence from Ontario and New Zealand
illustrates that title insurance is likely to become an additional cost in the
conveyancing process in Australia. In this article we highlight the reasons
why, and demonstrate how title insurers have, by working with the legal
profession been able to subtly move the risk of responsibility for
compensation for loss, (at least in the first instance) from the state to the
insurer, but with the added benefit for the state and the conveyancing agents
that the cost of the insurance is ultimately borne by the consumer. In New
Zealand this development is being accelerated by the introduction of capped
conveyancing title insurance. Whether title insurance will become part of the
conveyancing process is no longer the relevant question for Australia, (it
undoubtedly will), but the unknown issue is just how title insurance
companies will work with conveyancing agents to infiltrate the market, and
what response this infiltration will have in terms of the state’s view as to their
continued role in the provision of assurance. We suggest that developments
from New Zealand in relation to capped conveyancing insurance are likely to
be replicated in Australia in the near future, and that the state’s role in
providing an assurance fund will continue, though the state may seek to
expand the areas in which the right to compensation is restricted.