Accounting for Risk: The Advent of Capped Conveyancing Title Insurance

L. Griggs, R. Low, Rod Thomas
{"title":"Accounting for Risk: The Advent of Capped Conveyancing Title Insurance","authors":"L. Griggs, R. Low, Rod Thomas","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3325567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Title insurance companies originating from America, have, in the past \n15 years become part of the Australian conveyancing landscape. However \nfor most residential freehold owners, their activities would be a mystery. A \npurchaser does not routinely obtain title insurance, with the companies \npresently focussing on servicing the mortgagee sector. While the lack of \npenetration in the residential purchaser market may be attributed to the \nconsumer’s lack of knowledge, evidence from Ontario and New Zealand \nillustrates that title insurance is likely to become an additional cost in the \nconveyancing process in Australia. In this article we highlight the reasons \nwhy, and demonstrate how title insurers have, by working with the legal \nprofession been able to subtly move the risk of responsibility for \ncompensation for loss, (at least in the first instance) from the state to the \ninsurer, but with the added benefit for the state and the conveyancing agents \nthat the cost of the insurance is ultimately borne by the consumer. In New \nZealand this development is being accelerated by the introduction of capped \nconveyancing title insurance. Whether title insurance will become part of the \nconveyancing process is no longer the relevant question for Australia, (it \nundoubtedly will), but the unknown issue is just how title insurance \ncompanies will work with conveyancing agents to infiltrate the market, and \nwhat response this infiltration will have in terms of the state’s view as to their \ncontinued role in the provision of assurance. We suggest that developments \nfrom New Zealand in relation to capped conveyancing insurance are likely to \nbe replicated in Australia in the near future, and that the state’s role in \nproviding an assurance fund will continue, though the state may seek to \nexpand the areas in which the right to compensation is restricted.","PeriodicalId":214408,"journal":{"name":"Australian property law journal","volume":"64 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-01-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian property law journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3325567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Title insurance companies originating from America, have, in the past 15 years become part of the Australian conveyancing landscape. However for most residential freehold owners, their activities would be a mystery. A purchaser does not routinely obtain title insurance, with the companies presently focussing on servicing the mortgagee sector. While the lack of penetration in the residential purchaser market may be attributed to the consumer’s lack of knowledge, evidence from Ontario and New Zealand illustrates that title insurance is likely to become an additional cost in the conveyancing process in Australia. In this article we highlight the reasons why, and demonstrate how title insurers have, by working with the legal profession been able to subtly move the risk of responsibility for compensation for loss, (at least in the first instance) from the state to the insurer, but with the added benefit for the state and the conveyancing agents that the cost of the insurance is ultimately borne by the consumer. In New Zealand this development is being accelerated by the introduction of capped conveyancing title insurance. Whether title insurance will become part of the conveyancing process is no longer the relevant question for Australia, (it undoubtedly will), but the unknown issue is just how title insurance companies will work with conveyancing agents to infiltrate the market, and what response this infiltration will have in terms of the state’s view as to their continued role in the provision of assurance. We suggest that developments from New Zealand in relation to capped conveyancing insurance are likely to be replicated in Australia in the near future, and that the state’s role in providing an assurance fund will continue, though the state may seek to expand the areas in which the right to compensation is restricted.
风险核算:封顶产权转让保险的出现
起源于美国的产权保险公司,在过去的15年里已经成为澳大利亚产权转让领域的一部分。然而,对于大多数住宅永久业权所有者来说,他们的活动将是一个谜。买方通常不会获得产权保险,这些公司目前专注于为抵押人部门提供服务。虽然住宅买家市场缺乏渗透可能归因于消费者缺乏知识,但来自安大略省和新西兰的证据表明,所有权保险可能成为澳大利亚转让过程中的额外成本。在本文中,我们强调了原因,并展示了产权保险公司如何通过与法律专业人士合作,能够巧妙地将赔偿损失的责任风险(至少在第一次)从国家转移到保险公司,但对国家和转让代理人来说,保险成本最终由消费者承担,这是额外的好处。在新西兰,由于引入了有上限的产权转让保险,这一发展正在加速。所有权保险是否会成为转让过程的一部分不再是澳大利亚的相关问题,但未知的问题是所有权保险公司将如何与转让代理人合作渗透市场,以及这种渗透将如何反应国家对他们继续提供保证的作用的看法。我们认为,在不久的将来,新西兰在限制转让保险方面的发展可能会在澳大利亚复制,并且国家在提供保险基金方面的作用将继续,尽管国家可能会寻求扩大赔偿权利受到限制的领域。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信