7 Georgia’s Two Others: Nationalism and the Identity Struggle of a Post-Soviet Nation State

I. Chkhaidze
{"title":"7 Georgia’s Two Others: Nationalism and the Identity Struggle of a Post-Soviet Nation State","authors":"I. Chkhaidze","doi":"10.1515/9783110729290-007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Georgia is one of the countries where identity crises and nationalism have led to significant problems and caused political, social, and territorial disintegration during the first years of independence in the 1990s. Later the situation changed: along with Western aspirations, the Georgian national project gradually acquired civil features. The present contribution analyzes the symbolic and real roles of the West in the formation of post-Soviet Georgian public discourse(s) and the importance of attitudes to the West in the development of diverse forms of national identity. At the end of the 1980s, the country’s independence became the foremost goal of the national movement that started in the Soviet Republic of Georgia. After achieving this goal and the establishment of independence, at the beginning of the 1990s, the development of an independent democratic state became the most significant challenge for Georgian society. In the process of deconstructing the Soviet system, Georgians started to construct a new identity and searched for their own place within the international system. Since this period, the idea of the European origin of Georgians and their close links to the West has become widespread in the public and academic circles. The idea of “belonging to Europe” still plays a key role in the process of formation of the Georgian identity. However, the attitude to the West is not positive in all cases. Although Euro-Atlantic integration on the political level is the key message of the Georgian national project, a certain portion of Georgian society is filled with fear and mistrust of the West. Diverse social groups demonize the West, although, unlike in the Soviet era, in this case the “Western Demon” does not threaten the “Soviet motherland.” Instead, it threatens a traditional orthodox country with an ancient history. This contribution aims to study two different,","PeriodicalId":156833,"journal":{"name":"Nationalism in a Transnational Age","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nationalism in a Transnational Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110729290-007","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Georgia is one of the countries where identity crises and nationalism have led to significant problems and caused political, social, and territorial disintegration during the first years of independence in the 1990s. Later the situation changed: along with Western aspirations, the Georgian national project gradually acquired civil features. The present contribution analyzes the symbolic and real roles of the West in the formation of post-Soviet Georgian public discourse(s) and the importance of attitudes to the West in the development of diverse forms of national identity. At the end of the 1980s, the country’s independence became the foremost goal of the national movement that started in the Soviet Republic of Georgia. After achieving this goal and the establishment of independence, at the beginning of the 1990s, the development of an independent democratic state became the most significant challenge for Georgian society. In the process of deconstructing the Soviet system, Georgians started to construct a new identity and searched for their own place within the international system. Since this period, the idea of the European origin of Georgians and their close links to the West has become widespread in the public and academic circles. The idea of “belonging to Europe” still plays a key role in the process of formation of the Georgian identity. However, the attitude to the West is not positive in all cases. Although Euro-Atlantic integration on the political level is the key message of the Georgian national project, a certain portion of Georgian society is filled with fear and mistrust of the West. Diverse social groups demonize the West, although, unlike in the Soviet era, in this case the “Western Demon” does not threaten the “Soviet motherland.” Instead, it threatens a traditional orthodox country with an ancient history. This contribution aims to study two different,
格鲁吉亚的另外两个:民族主义和后苏联民族国家的身份斗争
在20世纪90年代独立的最初几年里,格鲁吉亚是身份危机和民族主义导致重大问题并导致政治、社会和领土解体的国家之一。后来情况发生了变化:随着西方的愿望,格鲁吉亚的国家项目逐渐获得了民用特征。本文分析了西方在后苏联时代格鲁吉亚公共话语形成中的象征性和现实作用,以及对西方的态度在多种形式的国家认同发展中的重要性。20世纪80年代末,国家独立成为始于苏维埃格鲁吉亚共和国的民族运动的首要目标。在实现这一目标并建立独立之后,在20世纪90年代初,发展一个独立的民主国家成为格鲁吉亚社会面临的最重大挑战。在解构苏联体系的过程中,格鲁吉亚人开始构建新的身份,并在国际体系中寻找自己的位置。自这一时期以来,格鲁吉亚人的欧洲血统及其与西方的密切联系的观点在公众和学术界广为流传。“属于欧洲”的观念在格鲁吉亚身份认同的形成过程中仍然起着关键作用。然而,对西方的态度并非总是积极的。虽然政治上的欧洲-大西洋一体化是格鲁吉亚国家计划的关键信息,但格鲁吉亚社会的某些部分充满了对西方的恐惧和不信任。不同的社会团体妖魔化西方,尽管与苏联时代不同,在这种情况下,“西方恶魔”并不威胁“苏联祖国”。相反,它威胁着一个有着悠久历史的传统正统国家。这篇文章旨在研究两种不同的,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信