Brief of Amicus Curiae Professor Kristin E. Hickman in Support of Petitioners, Florida Bankers Ass'n v. US Dep't of the Treasury, No. 15-969 (United States Supreme Court)

Kristin E. Hickman
{"title":"Brief of Amicus Curiae Professor Kristin E. Hickman in Support of Petitioners, Florida Bankers Ass'n v. US Dep't of the Treasury, No. 15-969 (United States Supreme Court)","authors":"Kristin E. Hickman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2739989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This amicus brief was filed before the United States Supreme Court, supporting the petition for certiorari in Florida Bankers Association v. United States Department of the Treasury, No. 15-969. The case concerns whether the Anti-Injunction Act, 26 U.S.C. s. 7421(a), precludes pre-enforcement judicial review of challenges against the validity of Treasury regulations under the Administrative Procedure Act. The brief explains the context and implications of the resolution of that issue for federal tax system administration and also maintains that the D.C. Circuit disregarded clear evidence of congressional intent in favor of a narrow interpretation of the Anti-Injunction Act that would allow judicial review of pre-enforcement APA claims against Treasury regulations.","PeriodicalId":233762,"journal":{"name":"U.S. Administrative Law eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U.S. Administrative Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2739989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This amicus brief was filed before the United States Supreme Court, supporting the petition for certiorari in Florida Bankers Association v. United States Department of the Treasury, No. 15-969. The case concerns whether the Anti-Injunction Act, 26 U.S.C. s. 7421(a), precludes pre-enforcement judicial review of challenges against the validity of Treasury regulations under the Administrative Procedure Act. The brief explains the context and implications of the resolution of that issue for federal tax system administration and also maintains that the D.C. Circuit disregarded clear evidence of congressional intent in favor of a narrow interpretation of the Anti-Injunction Act that would allow judicial review of pre-enforcement APA claims against Treasury regulations.
法庭之友克里斯汀·e·希克曼教授支持上诉人,佛罗里达银行家协会诉美国财政部案,第15-969号(美国最高法院)
这份法庭之友摘要已提交给美国最高法院,支持佛罗里达州银行家协会诉美国财政部案(第15-969号)调卷请求。本案涉及《反禁令法》(26 U.S.C. s. 7421(a))是否排除了对《行政程序法》下财政部法规有效性质疑的执行前司法审查。摘要解释了联邦税收系统管理解决该问题的背景和影响,并坚持认为,华盛顿特区巡回法院无视国会意图的明确证据,支持对《反禁令法》的狭义解释,该解释将允许对《反禁令法》针对财政部法规的强制执行前索赔进行司法审查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信