Brief of Amicus Curiae Professor Kristin E. Hickman in Support of Petitioners, Florida Bankers Ass'n v. US Dep't of the Treasury, No. 15-969 (United States Supreme Court)
{"title":"Brief of Amicus Curiae Professor Kristin E. Hickman in Support of Petitioners, Florida Bankers Ass'n v. US Dep't of the Treasury, No. 15-969 (United States Supreme Court)","authors":"Kristin E. Hickman","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2739989","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This amicus brief was filed before the United States Supreme Court, supporting the petition for certiorari in Florida Bankers Association v. United States Department of the Treasury, No. 15-969. The case concerns whether the Anti-Injunction Act, 26 U.S.C. s. 7421(a), precludes pre-enforcement judicial review of challenges against the validity of Treasury regulations under the Administrative Procedure Act. The brief explains the context and implications of the resolution of that issue for federal tax system administration and also maintains that the D.C. Circuit disregarded clear evidence of congressional intent in favor of a narrow interpretation of the Anti-Injunction Act that would allow judicial review of pre-enforcement APA claims against Treasury regulations.","PeriodicalId":233762,"journal":{"name":"U.S. Administrative Law eJournal","volume":"8 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"U.S. Administrative Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2739989","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This amicus brief was filed before the United States Supreme Court, supporting the petition for certiorari in Florida Bankers Association v. United States Department of the Treasury, No. 15-969. The case concerns whether the Anti-Injunction Act, 26 U.S.C. s. 7421(a), precludes pre-enforcement judicial review of challenges against the validity of Treasury regulations under the Administrative Procedure Act. The brief explains the context and implications of the resolution of that issue for federal tax system administration and also maintains that the D.C. Circuit disregarded clear evidence of congressional intent in favor of a narrow interpretation of the Anti-Injunction Act that would allow judicial review of pre-enforcement APA claims against Treasury regulations.
这份法庭之友摘要已提交给美国最高法院,支持佛罗里达州银行家协会诉美国财政部案(第15-969号)调卷请求。本案涉及《反禁令法》(26 U.S.C. s. 7421(a))是否排除了对《行政程序法》下财政部法规有效性质疑的执行前司法审查。摘要解释了联邦税收系统管理解决该问题的背景和影响,并坚持认为,华盛顿特区巡回法院无视国会意图的明确证据,支持对《反禁令法》的狭义解释,该解释将允许对《反禁令法》针对财政部法规的强制执行前索赔进行司法审查。