Lipid Goals in Diabetic Patients. Clinical Implications after Application of a New Formula for LDL-cholesterol Calculation

W. M. Juárez, M. Huerín, M. Lobo, G. Masson, Dona Websmaster, N. Fernández, G. Micali, Mariano Nemec, C. Romero, G. Molinero
{"title":"Lipid Goals in Diabetic Patients. Clinical Implications after Application of a New Formula for LDL-cholesterol Calculation","authors":"W. M. Juárez, M. Huerín, M. Lobo, G. Masson, Dona Websmaster, N. Fernández, G. Micali, Mariano Nemec, C. Romero, G. Molinero","doi":"10.7775/RAC.88.1.16342","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There are clear recommendations for lipid management in diabetic patients. A new formula for the calculation of LDLcholesterol(LDL-C) would improve the inaccuracy of the Friedewald formula.Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the use of statins and the fulfillment of lipid goals in diabetic patients, evaluatingthe consequences of applying a new formula for LDL-C calculation.Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study including type 2 diabetic patients over 18 years of age. LDL-Cwas calculated using the classic Friedewald formula and the new formula. Recommendations of the position document for the appropriateuse of statins from the Argentine Society of Cardiology were followed.Results: A total of 528 patients were included in the study. In secondary prevention, 77.2% of patients received statins (23.4% highintensitystatins) and 36.6% and 36.0% of these patients achieved the goals of LDL-C below 70% mg/dl and non-HDL-C below 100mg/dl, respectively. In 20.8% of patients with LDL-C below 70 mg/dl according to the Friedewald formula, this goal was not attainedwhen the new formula was applied. In primary prevention, 62.2% patients with risk factors or white organ damage received statins(14.7% high-intensity statins) and 20.9% and 20.4% achieved the goals of LDL-C below 70% mg/dl and non-HDL-C below 100 mg/dl. In 27.7% of patients with LDL-C below 70 mg/dl using the Friedewald formula, this goal was not reached when applying the newformula. More patients did not achieve the LDL-C goal with the new formula when the triglyceride level was higher.Conclusion: In this population, the appropriate use of statins and the fulfillment of lipid goals were poor. Applying the new LDL-Cformula optimized the evaluation of these patients.","PeriodicalId":447734,"journal":{"name":"Argentine Journal of Cardiology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Argentine Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7775/RAC.88.1.16342","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: There are clear recommendations for lipid management in diabetic patients. A new formula for the calculation of LDLcholesterol(LDL-C) would improve the inaccuracy of the Friedewald formula.Objectives: The aim of this study was to analyze the use of statins and the fulfillment of lipid goals in diabetic patients, evaluatingthe consequences of applying a new formula for LDL-C calculation.Methods: This was a descriptive, cross-sectional, multicenter study including type 2 diabetic patients over 18 years of age. LDL-Cwas calculated using the classic Friedewald formula and the new formula. Recommendations of the position document for the appropriateuse of statins from the Argentine Society of Cardiology were followed.Results: A total of 528 patients were included in the study. In secondary prevention, 77.2% of patients received statins (23.4% highintensitystatins) and 36.6% and 36.0% of these patients achieved the goals of LDL-C below 70% mg/dl and non-HDL-C below 100mg/dl, respectively. In 20.8% of patients with LDL-C below 70 mg/dl according to the Friedewald formula, this goal was not attainedwhen the new formula was applied. In primary prevention, 62.2% patients with risk factors or white organ damage received statins(14.7% high-intensity statins) and 20.9% and 20.4% achieved the goals of LDL-C below 70% mg/dl and non-HDL-C below 100 mg/dl. In 27.7% of patients with LDL-C below 70 mg/dl using the Friedewald formula, this goal was not reached when applying the newformula. More patients did not achieve the LDL-C goal with the new formula when the triglyceride level was higher.Conclusion: In this population, the appropriate use of statins and the fulfillment of lipid goals were poor. Applying the new LDL-Cformula optimized the evaluation of these patients.
糖尿病患者的血脂目标。低密度脂蛋白胆固醇计算新公式应用后的临床意义
背景:对于糖尿病患者的血脂管理有明确的建议。一个新的计算低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDL-C)的公式将改善弗里德瓦尔德公式的不准确性。目的:本研究的目的是分析他汀类药物的使用和糖尿病患者血脂目标的实现情况,评估应用新公式计算LDL-C的后果。方法:这是一项描述性、横断面、多中心研究,包括18岁以上的2型糖尿病患者。ldl - c分别用经典的Friedewald公式和新公式计算。遵循了阿根廷心脏病学会关于适当使用他汀类药物的立场文件的建议。结果:共纳入528例患者。在二级预防中,77.2%的患者接受了他汀类药物治疗(23.4%为高强度他汀类药物治疗),其中36.6%和36.0%的患者分别达到了LDL-C低于70% mg/dl和非hdl - c低于100mg/dl的目标。根据Friedewald公式,20.8%的LDL-C低于70 mg/dl的患者在应用新公式时未能达到这一目标。在一级预防方面,62.2%有危险因素或白色器官损害的患者接受了他汀类药物治疗(14.7%为高强度他汀类药物治疗),20.9%和20.4%的患者达到了LDL-C低于70% mg/dl和非hdl - c低于100mg /dl的目标。在使用Friedewald配方的LDL-C低于70 mg/dl的患者中,27.7%的患者在使用新配方时未能达到这一目标。当甘油三酯水平较高时,更多的患者没有达到新配方的LDL-C目标。结论:在该人群中,他汀类药物的合理使用和血脂目标的实现情况较差。应用新的ldl - c公式优化了对这些患者的评价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信