Conclusion

G. Zuckerman
{"title":"Conclusion","authors":"G. Zuckerman","doi":"10.1080/10610405.2021.2066938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is a banal fact of life that children at the beginning of their education need the help of adults. When dogmatic psychologists cite this truism and use Vygotsky’s term “interpsychological action,” they conjure up the illusion of understanding the phenomenon of the joint action. But in fact no one has yet answered the question of what the interpsychological action between a child and an adult is; what is its objectification; and how it differs from intrapsychological, totally individualized action. We have tried to answer these questions with regard to the initial stage of development of learning activity by early-grade schoolchildren. What do we mean when we say: a teacher is introducing a child into the realm of theoretical concepts; schoolchildren, with the teacher’s help, identify in the teaching material a certain basic relation, establish it in a symbolic form, etc. If a child entering a classroom were a tabula rasa, and the teacher were Pygmalion, then we could take the above literally. But the child, from the very first moment of interaction with a teacher, is active; in response to the teacher’s action he begins energetically to develop his own action. In the process children, of course, merely enter into the kind of relationship with the adult that they are already familiar with: a relationship of uncritical trust that they assimilated already in the infantile activities of direct, emotional interaction; a relationship of imitating models, which they assimilated in concrete, manipulative activities; and a role-playing relationship, which they assimilated in play. In these noneducational forms of responsive action by the child the theoretical content proffered by a teacher inevitably degenerates: in direct, emotional contacts all objectification is lost (except signs of mutual affection); in play-based relations the productivity of action disappears; and in imitative relationships the reflective content is eviscerated. Consequently, in order to transmit to children the conceptual content of educational activities, an adult must teach them a specific form of receiving this content—the form of educational collaboration. What is that?","PeriodicalId":308330,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Russian & East European Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10610405.2021.2066938","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is a banal fact of life that children at the beginning of their education need the help of adults. When dogmatic psychologists cite this truism and use Vygotsky’s term “interpsychological action,” they conjure up the illusion of understanding the phenomenon of the joint action. But in fact no one has yet answered the question of what the interpsychological action between a child and an adult is; what is its objectification; and how it differs from intrapsychological, totally individualized action. We have tried to answer these questions with regard to the initial stage of development of learning activity by early-grade schoolchildren. What do we mean when we say: a teacher is introducing a child into the realm of theoretical concepts; schoolchildren, with the teacher’s help, identify in the teaching material a certain basic relation, establish it in a symbolic form, etc. If a child entering a classroom were a tabula rasa, and the teacher were Pygmalion, then we could take the above literally. But the child, from the very first moment of interaction with a teacher, is active; in response to the teacher’s action he begins energetically to develop his own action. In the process children, of course, merely enter into the kind of relationship with the adult that they are already familiar with: a relationship of uncritical trust that they assimilated already in the infantile activities of direct, emotional interaction; a relationship of imitating models, which they assimilated in concrete, manipulative activities; and a role-playing relationship, which they assimilated in play. In these noneducational forms of responsive action by the child the theoretical content proffered by a teacher inevitably degenerates: in direct, emotional contacts all objectification is lost (except signs of mutual affection); in play-based relations the productivity of action disappears; and in imitative relationships the reflective content is eviscerated. Consequently, in order to transmit to children the conceptual content of educational activities, an adult must teach them a specific form of receiving this content—the form of educational collaboration. What is that?
结论
孩子们刚开始接受教育时需要大人的帮助,这是生活中司空见惯的事实。当教条主义的心理学家引用这一真理并使用维果茨基的术语“心理间作用”时,他们就会产生一种理解联合作用现象的错觉。但事实上,还没有人回答孩子和成人之间的心理间作用是什么;它的客观化是什么?以及它与心理上的,完全个性化的行为有何不同。我们试图回答这些关于初中生学习活动发展的初始阶段的问题。当我们说:老师正在把孩子引入理论概念的领域时,我们是什么意思?小学生在教师的帮助下,在教材中识别出某种基本关系,并以符号的形式建立起这种关系等。如果一个进入教室的孩子是一张白板,而老师是皮格马利翁,那么我们可以从字面上理解上面的说法。但是孩子,从与老师互动的第一刻起,就是活跃的;为了回应老师的行动,他开始积极地发展自己的行动。当然,在这个过程中,孩子们只是与他们已经熟悉的成年人建立了一种关系:一种不加批判的信任关系,他们已经在婴儿时期的直接情感互动活动中吸收了这种关系;一种模仿模型的关系,他们在具体的操作活动中吸收了模型;以及角色扮演关系,他们在游戏中吸收了这种关系。在儿童的这些非教育形式的反应性行为中,教师提供的理论内容不可避免地退化了:在直接的情感接触中,所有的客观化都消失了(除了相互喜爱的迹象);在基于游戏的关系中,行动的生产力消失了;在模仿关系中,反思的内容被掏空了。因此,为了向儿童传递教育活动的概念内容,成人必须教给他们一种接受这些内容的特定形式——教育合作的形式。那是什么?
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信