Effectiveness of midline lumbar fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spine disease in geriatric patients over 80 years old: a single-center, one-decade experience

G. Jang, Seung-Kwan Ryu
{"title":"Effectiveness of midline lumbar fusion with cortical bone trajectory screw fixation for degenerative lumbar spine disease in geriatric patients over 80 years old: a single-center, one-decade experience","authors":"G. Jang, Seung-Kwan Ryu","doi":"10.51638/jksgn.2022.00101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We aimed to retrospectively analyze clinical and surgical outcomes following posterior lumbar interbody fusion with concomitant pedicle screw fixation, midline lumbar fusion, and decompressive laminectomy in patients aged 80 years or older with degenerative lumbar spine disease.Methods: The study group comprised 94 patients aged 80 years or older who received degenerative lumbar spinal surgery at our spine center from January 2011 to December 2020. Among them, 28 patients underwent decompressive laminectomy, 19 underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation, and the remaining 47 underwent midline lumbar fusion.Results: No significant intergroup differences were found regarding age, sex ratio, follow-up duration, and surgical level. The visual analog scale for lower back pain on postoperative day 7 was significantly different among the groups (P<0.05). The Oswestry disability index was significantly different among the groups after 1 week of follow-up (P<0.05). The estimated blood loss and operation time also showed significant differences among the groups (P<0.05). There was a statistically significant difference among the groups in postoperative morbidity (P<0.05).Conclusion: Although the clinical outcomes were not significantly different among the three groups, perioperative morbidity was more favorable in the decompression and midline lumbar fusion groups. Therefore, we suggest that midline lumbar fusion is not inferior to posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation, if there is a need for fusion in elderly patients over 80 years of age.","PeriodicalId":161607,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Society of Geriatric Neurosurgery","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Society of Geriatric Neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51638/jksgn.2022.00101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to retrospectively analyze clinical and surgical outcomes following posterior lumbar interbody fusion with concomitant pedicle screw fixation, midline lumbar fusion, and decompressive laminectomy in patients aged 80 years or older with degenerative lumbar spine disease.Methods: The study group comprised 94 patients aged 80 years or older who received degenerative lumbar spinal surgery at our spine center from January 2011 to December 2020. Among them, 28 patients underwent decompressive laminectomy, 19 underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation, and the remaining 47 underwent midline lumbar fusion.Results: No significant intergroup differences were found regarding age, sex ratio, follow-up duration, and surgical level. The visual analog scale for lower back pain on postoperative day 7 was significantly different among the groups (P<0.05). The Oswestry disability index was significantly different among the groups after 1 week of follow-up (P<0.05). The estimated blood loss and operation time also showed significant differences among the groups (P<0.05). There was a statistically significant difference among the groups in postoperative morbidity (P<0.05).Conclusion: Although the clinical outcomes were not significantly different among the three groups, perioperative morbidity was more favorable in the decompression and midline lumbar fusion groups. Therefore, we suggest that midline lumbar fusion is not inferior to posterior lumbar interbody fusion with pedicle screw fixation, if there is a need for fusion in elderly patients over 80 years of age.
腰椎中线融合皮质骨轨迹螺钉固定治疗80岁以上退行性腰椎疾病的有效性:一项单中心、10年的经验
目的:回顾性分析80岁及以上腰椎退行性疾病患者后路腰椎椎体间融合术合并椎弓根螺钉固定、腰椎中线融合术和椎板减压切除术的临床和手术结果。方法:研究组包括2011年1月至2020年12月在我们脊柱中心接受退行性腰椎手术的94例80岁及以上患者。其中28例行椎板减压切除术,19例行后路腰椎椎间融合术加椎弓根螺钉固定,47例行腰椎中线融合术。结果:在年龄、性别比例、随访时间、手术水平等方面,组间无显著差异。术后第7天腰痛视觉模拟评分组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。随访1周后,两组间Oswestry失能指数差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组间估计失血量及手术时间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组术后发病率比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:虽然三组临床结果无显著差异,但减压组和腰椎中线融合术组围手术期发病率更有利。因此,我们建议,如果80岁以上的老年患者需要行椎弓根螺钉固定,腰椎中线融合术不逊于后路腰椎椎体间融合术。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信