Comparison between Neural Network based PI and PID controllers

Mohammed Y. Hassan, G. Kothapalli
{"title":"Comparison between Neural Network based PI and PID controllers","authors":"Mohammed Y. Hassan, G. Kothapalli","doi":"10.1109/SSD.2010.5585598","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Pneumatic actuation systems are widely used in industrial automation, such as drilling, sawing, squeezing, gripping, and spraying. Also, they are used in motion control of materials and parts handling, packing machines, machine tools, and in robotics; e.g. two-legged robot. In this paper, a Neural Network based PI controller and Neural Network based PID controller are designed and simulated to increase the position accuracy in a pneumatic servo actuator. In these designs, a well-trained Neural Network provides these controllers with suitable gains depending on feedback representing changes in position error and changes in external load force. These gains should keep the positional response within minimum overshoot, minimum rise time and minimum steady state error. A comparison between Neural Network based PI controller and Neural Network based PID controller was made to find the best controller that can be generated with simple structure according to the number of hidden layers and the number of neurons per layer. It was concluded that the Neural Network based PID controller was trained and generated with simpler structure and minimum Mean Square Error compared with the trained and generated one used with PI controller.","PeriodicalId":432382,"journal":{"name":"2010 7th International Multi- Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"26","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 7th International Multi- Conference on Systems, Signals and Devices","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SSD.2010.5585598","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 26

Abstract

The Pneumatic actuation systems are widely used in industrial automation, such as drilling, sawing, squeezing, gripping, and spraying. Also, they are used in motion control of materials and parts handling, packing machines, machine tools, and in robotics; e.g. two-legged robot. In this paper, a Neural Network based PI controller and Neural Network based PID controller are designed and simulated to increase the position accuracy in a pneumatic servo actuator. In these designs, a well-trained Neural Network provides these controllers with suitable gains depending on feedback representing changes in position error and changes in external load force. These gains should keep the positional response within minimum overshoot, minimum rise time and minimum steady state error. A comparison between Neural Network based PI controller and Neural Network based PID controller was made to find the best controller that can be generated with simple structure according to the number of hidden layers and the number of neurons per layer. It was concluded that the Neural Network based PID controller was trained and generated with simpler structure and minimum Mean Square Error compared with the trained and generated one used with PI controller.
基于神经网络的PI与PID控制器的比较
气动驱动系统广泛应用于工业自动化中,如钻孔、锯切、挤压、夹持、喷涂等。此外,它们还用于材料和零件处理,包装机,机床和机器人的运动控制;例如两条腿的机器人。为了提高气动伺服执行器的位置精度,设计并仿真了基于神经网络的PI控制器和基于神经网络的PID控制器。在这些设计中,训练有素的神经网络根据表示位置误差变化和外部负载力变化的反馈为这些控制器提供适当的增益。这些增益应使位置响应保持在最小超调、最小上升时间和最小稳态误差之内。将基于神经网络的PI控制器与基于神经网络的PID控制器进行比较,根据隐含层数和每层神经元数寻找结构简单的最佳控制器。结果表明,与使用PI控制器训练生成的PID控制器相比,基于神经网络训练生成的PID控制器结构更简单,均方误差最小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信