Administrative precedence in the context of a multisectoral understanding of its features in the criminal law of Russia and Belarus

V. Khilyuta
{"title":"Administrative precedence in the context of a multisectoral understanding of its features in the criminal law of Russia and Belarus","authors":"V. Khilyuta","doi":"10.18287/2542-047x-2022-8-1-21-28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the understanding of administrative precedence in the criminal law of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. The author raises the problem of understanding the administrative precedence through the prism of the time when the crime was committed and the retroactive effect of the criminal law. The question of the validity of bringing a person to criminal and administrative responsibility in the event of a crime with signs of administrative precedence is also discussed. The author concludes that the administrative precedence is a sign of the subject of the crime, and not of the objective side of the corpus delicti. It is also justified that bringing a person for repeated or repeated offenses to administrative rather than criminal responsibility cannot in the future serve as a repeated basis for the perpetrator to be prosecuted for a set of repeated identical acts. For this reason, no one can be held responsible twice for the same act.","PeriodicalId":406056,"journal":{"name":"Juridical Journal of Samara University","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juridical Journal of Samara University","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18287/2542-047x-2022-8-1-21-28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article discusses the understanding of administrative precedence in the criminal law of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus. The author raises the problem of understanding the administrative precedence through the prism of the time when the crime was committed and the retroactive effect of the criminal law. The question of the validity of bringing a person to criminal and administrative responsibility in the event of a crime with signs of administrative precedence is also discussed. The author concludes that the administrative precedence is a sign of the subject of the crime, and not of the objective side of the corpus delicti. It is also justified that bringing a person for repeated or repeated offenses to administrative rather than criminal responsibility cannot in the future serve as a repeated basis for the perpetrator to be prosecuted for a set of repeated identical acts. For this reason, no one can be held responsible twice for the same act.
在多部门了解其在俄罗斯和白俄罗斯刑法中的特点的背景下的行政优先权
本文探讨了俄罗斯联邦和白俄罗斯共和国刑法中对行政优先权的理解。笔者从犯罪发生的时间和刑法溯及力的角度出发,提出了理解行政优先权的问题。本文还讨论了在具有行政优先权迹象的犯罪中追究刑事和行政责任的有效性问题。笔者认为,行政优先权是犯罪主体的标志,而不是职权主体客观方面的标志。同样有理由的是,对一再或多次犯罪的人追究行政责任而不是刑事责任,今后不能作为对行为人因一系列重复的相同行为而起诉的重复依据。因此,任何人都不能为同一行为承担两次责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信