The Dialogue Strategy Between Left-wing Filmmakers and Film Audience in the 1930s — Focusing on the Construction of Audience by Film Critics of “Morning Paper·Daily Film”

Yilan Wang
{"title":"The Dialogue Strategy Between Left-wing Filmmakers and Film Audience in the 1930s — Focusing on the Construction of Audience by Film Critics of “Morning Paper·Daily Film”","authors":"Yilan Wang","doi":"10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210313.068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the 1930s, films became a tool for left-wing film critics to compete for the discourse power of films. This competition was not only directly reflected in the criticism of the film content, but also in the views of the audience. By specifying what viewing qualities the audience should have, left-wing film critics intervened in the construction of the film audience group image. Through the stipulations of ideal audience groups, the territory of left-wing films was delimited. At that time, some film review articles believed that the audience was ignorant and good films were needed to inspire people's wisdom, and some believed that the audience was sober-minded and the film shouldn't abandon the audience. This article attempts to start with articles involving the audience in the supplement \"Daily Film\" of \"Morning Paper\" and analyzes that behind this seemingly contradictory attitude, how film critics compete for the discourse power of films through the construction of the ideal audience group image and then get involved in the competition for the political discourse power.","PeriodicalId":244179,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Language, Communication and Culture Studies (ICLCCS 2020)","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Language, Communication and Culture Studies (ICLCCS 2020)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ASSEHR.K.210313.068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the 1930s, films became a tool for left-wing film critics to compete for the discourse power of films. This competition was not only directly reflected in the criticism of the film content, but also in the views of the audience. By specifying what viewing qualities the audience should have, left-wing film critics intervened in the construction of the film audience group image. Through the stipulations of ideal audience groups, the territory of left-wing films was delimited. At that time, some film review articles believed that the audience was ignorant and good films were needed to inspire people's wisdom, and some believed that the audience was sober-minded and the film shouldn't abandon the audience. This article attempts to start with articles involving the audience in the supplement "Daily Film" of "Morning Paper" and analyzes that behind this seemingly contradictory attitude, how film critics compete for the discourse power of films through the construction of the ideal audience group image and then get involved in the competition for the political discourse power.
20世纪30年代左翼电影人与电影观众的对话策略——以《晨报·每日电影》影评人对观众的建构为中心
20世纪30年代,电影成为左翼影评人争夺电影话语权的工具。这种竞争不仅直接体现在对电影内容的批评上,也体现在观众的看法上。左翼影评人通过明确观众应有的观影品质,介入了电影观众群体形象的建构。通过对理想观众群体的规定,划定了左翼电影的疆域。当时,一些影评文章认为观众是无知的,需要好的电影来激发人们的智慧,也有一些认为观众是清醒的,电影不应该抛弃观众。本文试图从《晨报》副刊《每日电影》中涉及观众的文章入手,分析在这种看似矛盾的态度背后,影评人是如何通过对理想观众群体形象的建构来争夺电影的话语权,进而参与到政治话语权的争夺之中的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信