Labor Law and Employment Regulation: Neoclassical and Institutional Perspectives

Bruce E. Kaufman
{"title":"Labor Law and Employment Regulation: Neoclassical and Institutional Perspectives","authors":"Bruce E. Kaufman","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1260837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an in-depth economic analysis of the pros and cons of labor law and employment regulation. Two law and economics movements are identified in the USA: the first is the well-known post-World War II law and economics movement centered in neoclassical economics and the University of Chicago; the second is the largely unknown and neglected pre-World II law and economics movement centered in institutional economics and the University of Wisconsin. The former mostly provides the con side to employment regulation, the latter mostly provides the pro side. The paper describes the assumptions, methods and theories of each school of thought and their implications regarding the optimal form and extent of labor law and employment regulation.","PeriodicalId":383948,"journal":{"name":"New Institutional Economics","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"15","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Institutional Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1260837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 15

Abstract

This paper provides an in-depth economic analysis of the pros and cons of labor law and employment regulation. Two law and economics movements are identified in the USA: the first is the well-known post-World War II law and economics movement centered in neoclassical economics and the University of Chicago; the second is the largely unknown and neglected pre-World II law and economics movement centered in institutional economics and the University of Wisconsin. The former mostly provides the con side to employment regulation, the latter mostly provides the pro side. The paper describes the assumptions, methods and theories of each school of thought and their implications regarding the optimal form and extent of labor law and employment regulation.
劳动法与就业法规:新古典主义与制度视角
本文对劳动法和就业法规的利弊进行了深入的经济分析。在美国,可以确定两种法律和经济运动:第一种是二战后著名的以新古典经济学和芝加哥大学为中心的法律和经济运动;第二个是在很大程度上不为人知和被忽视的二战前法律和经济学运动,其中心是制度经济学和威斯康星大学。前者主要提供就业监管的反面,后者主要提供就业监管的正面。本文介绍了各学派关于劳动法律和就业规制的最佳形式和范围的假设、方法和理论及其启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信