Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Tes Soal Pilihan Ganda Berbasis HOTS Pada Mata Pelajaran Administrasi Umum Jurusan OTKP SMK Negeri 1 Lamongan

Fia Maulidia, Triesninda Pahlevi
{"title":"Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Tes Soal Pilihan Ganda Berbasis HOTS Pada Mata Pelajaran Administrasi Umum Jurusan OTKP SMK Negeri 1 Lamongan","authors":"Fia Maulidia, Triesninda Pahlevi","doi":"10.26740/jpap.v8n1.p136-145","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The development of HOTS-based assessment instruments for general administration subjects aims to find out developing assessment instruments, quality of developing assessment instruments, and students' high-level thinking skills. This type of research is R&D, using the 4D development model with the stages of defining, designing, developing, and disseminating. This study only reached the development stage because the subject of this study was limited to class X OTKP SMK Negeri 1 Lamongan. The results showed that, material quality by material experts 100% (very strong), evaluation experts 89% (very strong), and linguists 62% (strong). 25 questions are valid and 5 questions are invalid, the reliability is 0.666 (high). Of the difficulty of the questions, 7 questions (23%) are easy, 22 questions (74%) are moderate, and 1 question (3%) is difficult. From the power of differentiation, 14 questions (47%) are very good, 12 questions (40%) are good, 3 questions (10%) are enough, and 1 question (3%) is not good. From the questioners, 20 questions (67%) had several functions and 10 questions (33%) all functioned, then 25 best questions were taken based on validity. Of the high-level thinking skills of students, 6 students (9%) are very good, 18 students (26%) are good, 45 students (64%) are sufficient, and 1 student (1%) is lacking.","PeriodicalId":423135,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP)","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Pendidikan Administrasi Perkantoran (JPAP)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26740/jpap.v8n1.p136-145","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

The development of HOTS-based assessment instruments for general administration subjects aims to find out developing assessment instruments, quality of developing assessment instruments, and students' high-level thinking skills. This type of research is R&D, using the 4D development model with the stages of defining, designing, developing, and disseminating. This study only reached the development stage because the subject of this study was limited to class X OTKP SMK Negeri 1 Lamongan. The results showed that, material quality by material experts 100% (very strong), evaluation experts 89% (very strong), and linguists 62% (strong). 25 questions are valid and 5 questions are invalid, the reliability is 0.666 (high). Of the difficulty of the questions, 7 questions (23%) are easy, 22 questions (74%) are moderate, and 1 question (3%) is difficult. From the power of differentiation, 14 questions (47%) are very good, 12 questions (40%) are good, 3 questions (10%) are enough, and 1 question (3%) is not good. From the questioners, 20 questions (67%) had several functions and 10 questions (33%) all functioned, then 25 best questions were taken based on validity. Of the high-level thinking skills of students, 6 students (9%) are very good, 18 students (26%) are good, 45 students (64%) are sufficient, and 1 student (1%) is lacking.
基于HOTS的双重选择测试工具的发展基于OTKP SMK州立一级行政专业
基于hots的综合行政学科评估工具的开发旨在了解评估工具的开发、评估工具的开发质量以及学生的高水平思维能力。这种类型的研究是R&D,使用4D开发模型,分为定义、设计、开发和传播四个阶段。由于本研究的对象仅限于X类OTKP SMK Negeri 1拉蒙干,因此本研究只进入了发展阶段。结果表明,材料质量由材料专家100%(非常强),评估专家89%(非常强),语言学家62%(强)。有效题数25题,无效题数5题,信度为0.666(高)。题目的难度中,容易的有7个(23%),中等的有22个(74%),难的有1个(3%)。从差异化的力量来看,14道题(47%)非常好,12道题(40%)很好,3道题(10%)够好,1道题(3%)不好。从问题中,20个问题(67%)具有多种功能,10个问题(33%)具有所有功能,然后根据效度选出25个最佳问题。在学生的高级思维技能中,6名学生(9%)非常好,18名学生(26%)很好,45名学生(64%)很好,1名学生(1%)缺乏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信