A comparative study of dynamics models for satellite formation flying - Cartesian ordinary differential equations description

M. Navabi, M. Barati, H. B. Khamseh
{"title":"A comparative study of dynamics models for satellite formation flying - Cartesian ordinary differential equations description","authors":"M. Navabi, M. Barati, H. B. Khamseh","doi":"10.1109/RAST.2011.5966959","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Formation flying is regarded as a feasible solution to bring order of magnitude improvements is performance and capabilities of our space assets. To take full advantage of the benefits offered by formation flying concepts, it is necessary to develop and examine its dynamics models. In this paper, four models namely Perturbed Nonlinear Model, Unperturbed Nonlinear Model, Linear Elliptic Model and Linear Circular Model are studied. Also, an error index is given to measure accuracy of each model. Based on our simulation results, compared to Perturbed Nonlinear Model as the reference, minimum error index was observed in the Unperturbed Nonlinear Model. Due to linearization, the Linear Elliptic Model exhibits some error, as the formation size expands. Error index in the Linear Circular Model increases as the relative distance increases. Furthermore, its error index experiences rapid increase, even for small eccentricities. Considering the effects of these error sources on each model, one may be able to choose the appropriate model according to the desired accuracy for a given mission.","PeriodicalId":285002,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies - RAST2011","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-06-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Recent Advances in Space Technologies - RAST2011","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAST.2011.5966959","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Formation flying is regarded as a feasible solution to bring order of magnitude improvements is performance and capabilities of our space assets. To take full advantage of the benefits offered by formation flying concepts, it is necessary to develop and examine its dynamics models. In this paper, four models namely Perturbed Nonlinear Model, Unperturbed Nonlinear Model, Linear Elliptic Model and Linear Circular Model are studied. Also, an error index is given to measure accuracy of each model. Based on our simulation results, compared to Perturbed Nonlinear Model as the reference, minimum error index was observed in the Unperturbed Nonlinear Model. Due to linearization, the Linear Elliptic Model exhibits some error, as the formation size expands. Error index in the Linear Circular Model increases as the relative distance increases. Furthermore, its error index experiences rapid increase, even for small eccentricities. Considering the effects of these error sources on each model, one may be able to choose the appropriate model according to the desired accuracy for a given mission.
卫星编队飞行动力学模型的比较研究——笛卡尔常微分方程描述
编队飞行被认为是一种可行的解决方案,可以大大提高我国空间资产的性能和能力。为了充分利用编队飞行概念的优势,有必要开发和研究编队飞行的动力学模型。本文研究了扰动非线性模型、无扰动非线性模型、线性椭圆模型和线性圆形模型。并给出了误差指标来衡量各模型的精度。仿真结果表明,与摄动非线性模型相比,无摄动非线性模型的误差指标最小。由于线性化,随着地层规模的扩大,线性椭圆模型存在一定的误差。线性圆模型的误差指数随着相对距离的增加而增加。此外,即使对于较小的偏心距,其误差指数也会迅速增加。考虑到这些误差源对每个模型的影响,人们可以根据给定任务所需的精度选择适当的模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信