Pressure-Stress Evaluation of Wells Drilled at the Angore Field, Western Fold Belt, PNG

S. Karner, J. A. Giddings, Tomas O'Kane, Matt Durrant, B. Darby, K. G.
{"title":"Pressure-Stress Evaluation of Wells Drilled at the Angore Field, Western Fold Belt, PNG","authors":"S. Karner, J. A. Giddings, Tomas O'Kane, Matt Durrant, B. Darby, K. G.","doi":"10.4043/32166-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n \n \n Thirteen ExxonMobil-operated gas development wells were drilled from 2012 to 2015 at the onshore Hides and Angore gas fields, Papua New Guinea (PNG), as part of the PNG LNG drilling program. Prior to drilling the PNG LNG wells, four wells had penetrated the Hides structure and one well had penetrated Angore. This paper focuses on pressure-stress interpretations at Angore, using drilling observations and data collected from the final three wells of the PNG LNG drilling program.\n \n \n \n The pressure-stress analyses of the PNG LNG Angore wells incorporated data collected while drilling, post-drill geologic and structural interpretations, and utilized a variety of geomechanical concepts that were constrained by the well data. Post-drill formation pressures were either estimated (e.g. from petrophysical trends, mud-log data, cavings analysis, formation fluid influxes) or directly measured using downhole pressure tools (reservoir only). Rock stresses were estimated or inferred from geomechanical relationships that were constrained by wellbore data (e.g. leak-off tests, mud weights), wellbore geometry (e.g. ovalization related to breakout), cavings analysis, and drilling events (e.g. lost returns, ballooning).\n \n \n \n The Angore well pads were constructed on Miocene Darai Limestone. Below the Darai Limestone, the wells penetrated a clastic section consisting of Cretaceous Ieru Formation (Haito, Ubea, Giero, Bawia, Juha, Alene Members), early Cretaceous Toro sandstone reservoir, and Jurassic Imburu Formation. The initial exploration well (Angore 1A drilled by BP in 1990) encountered a complex pressure-stress depth profile that was comparable to nearby offset wells. Hydrostatic pressure occurs below the water table (in the Darai Limestone) and continues into the Ubea Member. The clay-rich lower Ubea Member supports the onset of a pressure ramp that reaches maximum excess pressure in the Giero Member. Elevated excess pressures persist to the lower Alene Member at which point a pressure regression occurs into the Toro Sandstone and upper Imburu Formation. The first Angore well of the PNG LNG program (Angore B1) encountered a level of structural complexity together with extreme pressures and stresses that were not anticipated prior to drilling. Due to these complexities, the target reservoir was not reached and the well was plugged and suspended. Two subsequent wells (Angore A1 and A2) encountered similar tectonic complexity, but successfully drilled through the extreme conditions to reach the reservoir.\n \n \n \n The analyses from Angore support a geomechanical model that involves an interplay between structural history and mechanical stratigraphy, insofar as: 1) formation pressure and stress regime varies with depth and lithology; 2) stratigraphic mechanical properties and structural geometry allow for a non-Andersonian stress state (minimum stress exceeded overburden); 3) stress magnitude may be controlled by fault geometry/timing and formation excess pressure; and 4) parts of the structure may be presently close to Mohr-Coulomb failure.\n","PeriodicalId":196855,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, May 02, 2023","volume":"86 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, May 02, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4043/32166-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Thirteen ExxonMobil-operated gas development wells were drilled from 2012 to 2015 at the onshore Hides and Angore gas fields, Papua New Guinea (PNG), as part of the PNG LNG drilling program. Prior to drilling the PNG LNG wells, four wells had penetrated the Hides structure and one well had penetrated Angore. This paper focuses on pressure-stress interpretations at Angore, using drilling observations and data collected from the final three wells of the PNG LNG drilling program. The pressure-stress analyses of the PNG LNG Angore wells incorporated data collected while drilling, post-drill geologic and structural interpretations, and utilized a variety of geomechanical concepts that were constrained by the well data. Post-drill formation pressures were either estimated (e.g. from petrophysical trends, mud-log data, cavings analysis, formation fluid influxes) or directly measured using downhole pressure tools (reservoir only). Rock stresses were estimated or inferred from geomechanical relationships that were constrained by wellbore data (e.g. leak-off tests, mud weights), wellbore geometry (e.g. ovalization related to breakout), cavings analysis, and drilling events (e.g. lost returns, ballooning). The Angore well pads were constructed on Miocene Darai Limestone. Below the Darai Limestone, the wells penetrated a clastic section consisting of Cretaceous Ieru Formation (Haito, Ubea, Giero, Bawia, Juha, Alene Members), early Cretaceous Toro sandstone reservoir, and Jurassic Imburu Formation. The initial exploration well (Angore 1A drilled by BP in 1990) encountered a complex pressure-stress depth profile that was comparable to nearby offset wells. Hydrostatic pressure occurs below the water table (in the Darai Limestone) and continues into the Ubea Member. The clay-rich lower Ubea Member supports the onset of a pressure ramp that reaches maximum excess pressure in the Giero Member. Elevated excess pressures persist to the lower Alene Member at which point a pressure regression occurs into the Toro Sandstone and upper Imburu Formation. The first Angore well of the PNG LNG program (Angore B1) encountered a level of structural complexity together with extreme pressures and stresses that were not anticipated prior to drilling. Due to these complexities, the target reservoir was not reached and the well was plugged and suspended. Two subsequent wells (Angore A1 and A2) encountered similar tectonic complexity, but successfully drilled through the extreme conditions to reach the reservoir. The analyses from Angore support a geomechanical model that involves an interplay between structural history and mechanical stratigraphy, insofar as: 1) formation pressure and stress regime varies with depth and lithology; 2) stratigraphic mechanical properties and structural geometry allow for a non-Andersonian stress state (minimum stress exceeded overburden); 3) stress magnitude may be controlled by fault geometry/timing and formation excess pressure; and 4) parts of the structure may be presently close to Mohr-Coulomb failure.
巴布亚新几内亚西部褶皱带Angore油田钻井压力-应力评价
作为巴布亚新几内亚液化天然气钻井计划的一部分,从2012年到2015年,埃克森美孚在巴布亚新几内亚陆上Hides和Angore气田钻探了13口天然气开发井。在钻探PNG LNG井之前,已有4口井穿过Hides构造,1口井穿过Angore构造。本文利用钻井观测和PNG LNG钻井项目最后三口井收集的数据,重点分析了Angore的压力-应力解释。PNG LNG Angore井的压力-应力分析结合了钻井时收集的数据、钻后地质和构造解释,并利用了受井数据限制的各种地质力学概念。钻后地层压力要么是估算的(例如,从岩石物理趋势、泥浆测井数据、落洞分析、地层流体流入),要么是使用井下压力工具直接测量的(仅限储层)。根据地质力学关系估算或推断岩石应力,这些关系受井眼数据(例如泄漏测试、泥浆比重)、井眼几何形状(例如与破裂相关的卵圆)、崩落分析和钻井事件(例如回井损失、膨胀)的约束。Angore井台建在中新世的达拉灰岩上。在Darai灰岩下方,井穿过了白垩纪Ieru组(Haito、Ubea、Giero、Bawia、Juha、Alene段)、早白垩世Toro砂岩储层和侏罗系Imburu组。最初的探井(Angore 1A由BP于1990年钻探)遇到了一个复杂的压力-应力深度剖面,与附近的邻井相当。静水压力发生在地下水位以下(在达莱石灰岩中),并继续进入Ubea段。富含粘土的下Ubea成员支持压力斜坡的开始,在Giero成员中达到最大的超压力。过高的压力持续到Alene段下部,此时Toro砂岩和Imburu组上部出现压力回归。PNG LNG项目的第一口Angore井(Angore B1)遇到了一定程度的结构复杂性,以及钻井前没有预料到的极端压力和应力。由于这些复杂性,最终未能达到目标储层,因此该井被封堵并暂停。随后的两口井(Angore A1和A2)也遇到了类似的构造复杂性,但成功地在极端条件下钻到了储层。Angore的分析支持一个地质力学模型,该模型涉及构造历史和机械地层学之间的相互作用,因为:1)地层压力和应力状态随深度和岩性而变化;2)地层力学性质和构造几何允许非安德森应力状态(最小应力超过覆盖层);3)应力大小可能受断层几何形状/时间和地层超压控制;4)部分结构目前可能接近莫尔-库仑破坏。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信