Innovation, Management Practices, and Productivity

Mary J. Benner
{"title":"Innovation, Management Practices, and Productivity","authors":"Mary J. Benner","doi":"10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Economics scholars have studied innovation as the “residual” in explaining productivity growth. Other research has examined the influence of programs like Six Sigma or ISO 9000, practices expected to directly improve efficiency and productivity within firms. Separately, management research has explored the idea that practices focused on process improvement can shift an organization’s focus toward incremental innovation, “crowding out” more radical, exploratory innovation. Thus, a full assessment of the influence of both innovation and management practices on productivity must consider how management practices—adopted specifically to improve operational efficiency—influence innovation. This chapter combines insights from three largely disparate research streams, highlighting the tensions and the potentially unintended longer-term effects of particular management practices on innovation. The chapter sheds light on the tension between improvement in firm-level productivity, innovation, and aggregate productivity growth, provides alternative explanations for results from prior research, and suggests some directions for future research.","PeriodicalId":287755,"journal":{"name":"The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oxford Handbook of Productivity Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/OXFORDHB/9780190226718.013.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Economics scholars have studied innovation as the “residual” in explaining productivity growth. Other research has examined the influence of programs like Six Sigma or ISO 9000, practices expected to directly improve efficiency and productivity within firms. Separately, management research has explored the idea that practices focused on process improvement can shift an organization’s focus toward incremental innovation, “crowding out” more radical, exploratory innovation. Thus, a full assessment of the influence of both innovation and management practices on productivity must consider how management practices—adopted specifically to improve operational efficiency—influence innovation. This chapter combines insights from three largely disparate research streams, highlighting the tensions and the potentially unintended longer-term effects of particular management practices on innovation. The chapter sheds light on the tension between improvement in firm-level productivity, innovation, and aggregate productivity growth, provides alternative explanations for results from prior research, and suggests some directions for future research.
创新、管理实践和生产力
经济学家把创新作为解释生产率增长的“剩余”来研究。其他研究也考察了六西格玛或iso9000等项目的影响,这些实践有望直接提高公司的效率和生产力。另外,管理研究已经探索了这样一种想法,即专注于过程改进的实践可以将组织的焦点转向增量创新,“挤出”更激进的、探索性的创新。因此,要全面评估创新和管理实践对生产率的影响,必须考虑管理实践(专门用于提高运营效率)如何影响创新。本章结合了来自三个基本上不同的研究流的见解,突出了特定管理实践对创新的紧张关系和潜在的意想不到的长期影响。本章揭示了企业层面的生产率提高、创新和总生产率增长之间的紧张关系,为先前的研究结果提供了另一种解释,并为未来的研究提出了一些方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信