Latex agglutination and hemagglutination tests for the rapid identification of methicillin sensitive and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

S M Qadri, J Akhter, S G Qadri
{"title":"Latex agglutination and hemagglutination tests for the rapid identification of methicillin sensitive and methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.","authors":"S M Qadri,&nbsp;J Akhter,&nbsp;S G Qadri","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ten latex agglutination (LA) and hemagglutination (HA) kits for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus were compared with reference methods for their reliability and performance. The ten commercial kits consisted of Accu-Staph, Bacto-Staph, Hemastaph, Staphaurex, Staph-Latex, Staphylochrome, Staphyloslide, Staph-Rapid, Sero-Stat and Veri-Staph. The conventional methods included slide coagulase test, tube coagulase test (4 hr, 24 hr), thermonuclease and growth on mannitol salt agar (MSA). A total of 583 clinical isolates of staphylococci were used and all the kits correlated well with the conventional methods (93.1-99.4% sensitivity) in their ability to identify both methicillin sensitive (MSSA) and methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Although all were rapid, easy to perform and simple to interpret, Staphaurex and Staphyloslide gave the best sensitivities and specificities.</p>","PeriodicalId":76007,"journal":{"name":"Journal of hygiene, epidemiology, microbiology, and immunology","volume":"35 1","pages":"65-71"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1991-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of hygiene, epidemiology, microbiology, and immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ten latex agglutination (LA) and hemagglutination (HA) kits for the identification of Staphylococcus aureus were compared with reference methods for their reliability and performance. The ten commercial kits consisted of Accu-Staph, Bacto-Staph, Hemastaph, Staphaurex, Staph-Latex, Staphylochrome, Staphyloslide, Staph-Rapid, Sero-Stat and Veri-Staph. The conventional methods included slide coagulase test, tube coagulase test (4 hr, 24 hr), thermonuclease and growth on mannitol salt agar (MSA). A total of 583 clinical isolates of staphylococci were used and all the kits correlated well with the conventional methods (93.1-99.4% sensitivity) in their ability to identify both methicillin sensitive (MSSA) and methicillin resistant S. aureus (MRSA). Although all were rapid, easy to perform and simple to interpret, Staphaurex and Staphyloslide gave the best sensitivities and specificities.

快速鉴定甲氧西林敏感和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌的胶乳凝集和血凝试验。
对10种乳胶凝集(LA)和血凝(HA)试剂盒用于金黄色葡萄球菌鉴定的可靠性和性能与参考方法进行比较。10种商品试剂盒包括Accu-Staph、Bacto-Staph、Hemastaph、Staphaurex、Staph-Latex、Staphylochrome、Staphyloslide、Staph-Rapid、Sero-Stat和Veri-Staph。常规方法包括玻片凝固酶试验、试管凝固酶试验(4小时、24小时)、热酶和甘露醇盐琼脂(MSA)生长。结果表明,该试剂盒对甲氧西林敏感(MSSA)和耐甲氧西林金黄色葡萄球菌(MRSA)的检测结果与常规方法(灵敏度为93.1 ~ 99.4%)具有良好的相关性。虽然所有的方法都是快速,易于执行和简单的解释,葡萄球菌和葡萄滑片提供了最好的灵敏度和特异性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书