Chi Liu, L. Volokh, Xide Zhao, Jingyan Xu, Taek-Soo Lee, B. Tsui
{"title":"Performance evaluation of block-iterative algorithms for SPECT reconstruction","authors":"Chi Liu, L. Volokh, Xide Zhao, Jingyan Xu, Taek-Soo Lee, B. Tsui","doi":"10.1109/NSSMIC.2005.1596676","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of four block-iterative algorithms, ordered-subsets expectation-maximization (OS-EM), rescaled block-iterative EM (RBI-EM), modified row-action maximum likelihood algorithm (RAMLA) and rescaled block-iterative maximum a posteriori EM (RBI-MAP-EM), for In-111 ProstaScint/spl reg/ SPECT image reconstruction. The 3D NCAT phantom with realistic In-111 ProstaScint/spl reg/ activity distribution was used in the study. Noise-free and noisy projections of the phantom obtained using a medium-energy general-purpose (MEGP) collimator were generated using Monte Carlo simulation methods. For each algorithm, the projection data were reconstructed with the compensations for attenuation, collimator-detector response and scatter. Image quality was evaluated in terms of FWHM of a profile through a small blood vessel, normalized mean square error (NMSE), ensemble normalized standard deviation (NSDE) of a uniform region of interest (ROI) in the reconstructed image measured from 30 noise realizations, and regional NSD (NSDR) of an ROI measure from 1 noise realization. The results indicated that, RBI-EM has superior performance than that of OS-EM when less than 4 views per subset were used and similar performance when 4 or more views per subset were used. Modified RAMLA provides similar image quality with a slower convergence rate than that of OS-EM. Using well-chosen parameters, RBI-MAP-EM provides increased noise smoothing with less loss in resolution and error. We conclude that when compared with OS-EM, the RBI-EM and modified RAMLA have the same performance at a slower convergence rate, while the RBI-MAP-EM has superior performance and can potentially improve image quality.","PeriodicalId":105619,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record, 2005","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/NSSMIC.2005.1596676","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the performance of four block-iterative algorithms, ordered-subsets expectation-maximization (OS-EM), rescaled block-iterative EM (RBI-EM), modified row-action maximum likelihood algorithm (RAMLA) and rescaled block-iterative maximum a posteriori EM (RBI-MAP-EM), for In-111 ProstaScint/spl reg/ SPECT image reconstruction. The 3D NCAT phantom with realistic In-111 ProstaScint/spl reg/ activity distribution was used in the study. Noise-free and noisy projections of the phantom obtained using a medium-energy general-purpose (MEGP) collimator were generated using Monte Carlo simulation methods. For each algorithm, the projection data were reconstructed with the compensations for attenuation, collimator-detector response and scatter. Image quality was evaluated in terms of FWHM of a profile through a small blood vessel, normalized mean square error (NMSE), ensemble normalized standard deviation (NSDE) of a uniform region of interest (ROI) in the reconstructed image measured from 30 noise realizations, and regional NSD (NSDR) of an ROI measure from 1 noise realization. The results indicated that, RBI-EM has superior performance than that of OS-EM when less than 4 views per subset were used and similar performance when 4 or more views per subset were used. Modified RAMLA provides similar image quality with a slower convergence rate than that of OS-EM. Using well-chosen parameters, RBI-MAP-EM provides increased noise smoothing with less loss in resolution and error. We conclude that when compared with OS-EM, the RBI-EM and modified RAMLA have the same performance at a slower convergence rate, while the RBI-MAP-EM has superior performance and can potentially improve image quality.