Silent Slaves: Reconstructing Slave Perspectives on the Grave Stele of Hegeso

A. Garcia
{"title":"Silent Slaves: Reconstructing Slave Perspectives on the Grave Stele of Hegeso","authors":"A. Garcia","doi":"10.5399/uo/ourj/18.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Grave Stele of Hegeso (400 BCE) depicts a ‘mistress and maid’ scene and preserves valuable insights into elite iconography. The stele also explores the experiences of wealthy Athenian women in their social roles and domestic spaces. The slave attendant, if discussed at length, primarily functions as a method of contrast and comparison to her elite master. While the comparison between elite and non-elite women is a valuable interpretation for studies of gender and class in classical Athens, more can be done in regard to examining the slave attendant on the stele, and as a result, examining slave figures in Greek art. Slaves made up a sizeable portion of classical Athenian society and were present in both elite and poor households. However, due to a lack of material and written evidence, the field of classics has not explored the concept of Greek slavery to its full extent. In addition, what little does remain to modern scholars was commissioned or written by elite voices, who were biased against slaves. The remaining elite perspective does provide insight into the role of slaves in classical Athenian households and can be reexamined to find subversive interpretations. This paper explores potential reconstructions for slave perspectives and narratives on the Grave Stele of Hegeso by drawing upon the Attic funerary practices and literary tropes of the Good Slave and Bad Slave in Athenian theater and Homeric epic. This paper also discusses the relationships between masters and slaves, household slave dynamics, and what constitutes the idealized Athenian slave. While the majority of remaining classical material and literary evidence relates to the elite, subversive ideals can be picked out from elite narratives and used to better understand the perspectives of the enslaved, construct frameworks that give voices to disenfranchised groups, and further enrich the study of surviving elite perspectives.","PeriodicalId":338305,"journal":{"name":"Oregon Undergraduate Research Journal","volume":"20 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oregon Undergraduate Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5399/uo/ourj/18.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Grave Stele of Hegeso (400 BCE) depicts a ‘mistress and maid’ scene and preserves valuable insights into elite iconography. The stele also explores the experiences of wealthy Athenian women in their social roles and domestic spaces. The slave attendant, if discussed at length, primarily functions as a method of contrast and comparison to her elite master. While the comparison between elite and non-elite women is a valuable interpretation for studies of gender and class in classical Athens, more can be done in regard to examining the slave attendant on the stele, and as a result, examining slave figures in Greek art. Slaves made up a sizeable portion of classical Athenian society and were present in both elite and poor households. However, due to a lack of material and written evidence, the field of classics has not explored the concept of Greek slavery to its full extent. In addition, what little does remain to modern scholars was commissioned or written by elite voices, who were biased against slaves. The remaining elite perspective does provide insight into the role of slaves in classical Athenian households and can be reexamined to find subversive interpretations. This paper explores potential reconstructions for slave perspectives and narratives on the Grave Stele of Hegeso by drawing upon the Attic funerary practices and literary tropes of the Good Slave and Bad Slave in Athenian theater and Homeric epic. This paper also discusses the relationships between masters and slaves, household slave dynamics, and what constitutes the idealized Athenian slave. While the majority of remaining classical material and literary evidence relates to the elite, subversive ideals can be picked out from elite narratives and used to better understand the perspectives of the enslaved, construct frameworks that give voices to disenfranchised groups, and further enrich the study of surviving elite perspectives.
沉默的奴隶:重建黑格索墓碑上的奴隶视角
Hegeso的墓碑(公元前400年)描绘了一个“女主人和女仆”的场景,并保留了对精英肖像的宝贵见解。石碑还探讨了富裕的雅典妇女在社会角色和家庭空间中的经历。如果详细讨论的话,奴隶侍从主要是作为一种对比和比较她的精英主人的方法。虽然精英女性和非精英女性之间的比较对于古典雅典的性别和阶级研究是有价值的解释,但在检查石碑上的奴隶随从方面可以做得更多,因此,检查希腊艺术中的奴隶形象。奴隶在古典雅典社会中占有相当大的比例,在精英家庭和穷人家庭中都有奴隶。然而,由于缺乏材料和书面证据,经典领域并没有充分探索希腊奴隶制的概念。此外,留给现代学者的为数不多的作品都是由对奴隶有偏见的精英人士委托或撰写的。剩下的精英视角确实提供了对奴隶在古典雅典家庭中的角色的洞察,并且可以重新审视以找到颠覆性的解释。本文通过借鉴雅典戏剧和荷马史诗中阿提卡的丧葬习俗和好奴隶和坏奴隶的文学比喻,探讨了对Hegeso墓碑上奴隶视角和叙事的潜在重建。本文还讨论了主人和奴隶之间的关系,家庭奴隶的动态,以及什么构成了理想的雅典奴隶。虽然大多数现存的经典材料和文学证据与精英有关,但可以从精英叙事中挑选出颠覆性的理想,用于更好地理解被奴役者的观点,构建框架,为被剥夺权利的群体提供声音,并进一步丰富对幸存精英观点的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信