Reliability assesment of radial feeder for different automation intensity levels

E. Vidyasagar, P. Prasad
{"title":"Reliability assesment of radial feeder for different automation intensity levels","authors":"E. Vidyasagar, P. Prasad","doi":"10.1109/RAICS.2011.6069346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper determines the reliability indices of a radial distribution system for different automation intensity levels such as non- automated, fully automated and partially automated systems. When fault occurs, in case of non-automated and fully automated systems the restoration takes place in single stage whereas in partially automated systems it will be in two- stages. In a two- stage restoration strategy, a first stage quickly restores a limited set of customers using automated switches and at a later stage some other customers are restored by using manual switches. Feeder automation requires a considerable expenditure and therefore at present many utilities are looking for partial automation of feeders which require the concept of two- stage restoration. In the conventional SCADA system, the control decision is taken manually on the basis of experience and the available real time data. It is then executed through the man machine interface. On the other hand, computer based control decisions are taken in the DA system and these control decisions are executed in either automatic mode or in semi-automatic mode through human intervention The reliability indices of RBTS BUS-2 are evaluated for different six cases and the results are compared","PeriodicalId":394515,"journal":{"name":"2011 IEEE Recent Advances in Intelligent Computational Systems","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-11-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2011 IEEE Recent Advances in Intelligent Computational Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAICS.2011.6069346","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper determines the reliability indices of a radial distribution system for different automation intensity levels such as non- automated, fully automated and partially automated systems. When fault occurs, in case of non-automated and fully automated systems the restoration takes place in single stage whereas in partially automated systems it will be in two- stages. In a two- stage restoration strategy, a first stage quickly restores a limited set of customers using automated switches and at a later stage some other customers are restored by using manual switches. Feeder automation requires a considerable expenditure and therefore at present many utilities are looking for partial automation of feeders which require the concept of two- stage restoration. In the conventional SCADA system, the control decision is taken manually on the basis of experience and the available real time data. It is then executed through the man machine interface. On the other hand, computer based control decisions are taken in the DA system and these control decisions are executed in either automatic mode or in semi-automatic mode through human intervention The reliability indices of RBTS BUS-2 are evaluated for different six cases and the results are compared
不同自动化强度下径向给料机可靠性评估
本文确定了非自动化、全自动化和部分自动化等不同自动化程度下径向配电系统的可靠性指标。当故障发生时,无论是非自动化系统还是全自动化系统,故障恢复都是单阶段进行的,而在部分自动化系统中,故障恢复将分两个阶段进行。在两阶段恢复策略中,第一阶段使用自动开关快速恢复有限的一组客户,在后面的阶段使用手动开关恢复一些其他客户。馈线自动化需要相当大的支出,因此目前许多公用事业公司正在寻找部分自动化的馈线,这需要两阶段恢复的概念。在传统的SCADA系统中,控制决策是根据经验和可用的实时数据人工进行的。然后通过人机界面执行。另一方面,在数据处理系统中进行基于计算机的控制决策,这些控制决策通过人工干预在自动模式或半自动模式下执行,并对RBTS BUS-2在不同情况下的可靠性指标进行了评估,并对结果进行了比较
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信