Temporal and spatial variation in the zooplankton : phytoplankton biomass ratio in a large shallow lake

K. Blank, R. Laugaste, J. Haberman
{"title":"Temporal and spatial variation in the zooplankton : phytoplankton biomass ratio in a large shallow lake","authors":"K. Blank, R. Laugaste, J. Haberman","doi":"10.3176/ECO.2010.2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION Research of large lakes is highly complex as such lakes expand over a large area and are affected by an enormous number of different climatic and environmental factors (Blenckner, 2008). Various specific indicators and indexes are needed to facilitate the understanding of the state (and its changes) of large lakes. The zooplankton : phytoplankton biomass ratio ([MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]) largely reflects the type (effectiveness) of the food web in a water body and hence the nature of the ecosystem. Indirectly, it characterizes dominating groups in phyto- and zooplankton, feeding relationships between them and fish, as well as the pressure of fish on zooplankton. The [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] ratio can be used as a marker criterion for the evaluation of the trophy of a water body and its ecosystem and, particularly, for permanent monitoring of a water body. This ratio decreases with the rise of the trophic state (Gulati, 1983; Andronikova, 1996; Jeppesen et al., 1999, 2000, 2005; Haberman & Laugaste, 2003). It is widely recognized that phytoplankton is influenced most by nutrients (bottom up) while zooplankton is influenced both by consumers (top down) and algae (bottom up). This causes their different seasonal dynamics and complicated relevant ratios. Thus, the values of the [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] ratio are fluctuating within and across years. This variability has not been thoroughly analysed. Some data concerning this ratio for L. Peipsi have been published on the basis of plankton sampled up to the end of the last century (Haberman, 1996; Haberman & Laugaste, 2003; Noges & Noges, 2006). As the situation in the lake has changed markedly during this decade, a new analysis of the ratio has been initiated. About two decades ago, the ecosystem of the lake was in a quite good balance, and an effective algal food web prevailed in the open water (Noges et al., 1993). Since the late 1990s and during the 2000s, the ecosystem of the lake lost its stability. The proportion of cyanobacteria in the biomass of summer phytoplankton increased consistently: from 20% to 70% in L. Peipsi sensu stricto (s.s.), and from 30% to 90% in the southern lake parts (Laugaste et al., 2007). An appreciable concentration of microcystins was detected in the lake water in the summer months of the 2000s (Tanner et al., 2005), and the biomass of the genus Microcystis exceeded 20 g [m.sup.-3] in the southern lake parts in some years. At the same time, a continuous decline in zooplankton (Haberman et al., 2008) and changes in fish population (Kangur et al., 2008) were observed. The stock of planktivorous smelt (Osmerus eperlanus eperlanus m. spirinchus Pallas) and vendace (Coregonus albula (L.)) decreased drastically, and the abundance of piscivorous pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)) increased but, owing to over-fishing, the amount of pikeperch is modest (Kangur et al., 2008). Noges et al. (2005) explained the destabilization of the ecosystem with a decrease in the N : P ratio caused by increased phosphorus loading and reduced nitrogen loading in recent decades. The aim of this study was to follow the variations of the [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] ratio in different months, in different parts of the lake, and in different years; to establish boundaries of this variability, and to analyse how its changes reflect the state of the lake. We argue that the [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] ratio (particularly the mean for a growing season) can be used as a marker characteristic for estimating the trophy of a water body. STUDY SITE Lake Peipsi sensu lato (s.l.) is a large (area 3555 [km.sup.2], the fourth largest lake in Europe) and shallow (mean depth 7.1 m), mainly unstratified lowland water body. Located on the Estonian-Russian border, L. Peipsi is the largest trans boundary lake in Europe. …","PeriodicalId":262667,"journal":{"name":"Estonian Journal of Ecology","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estonian Journal of Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3176/ECO.2010.2.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

INTRODUCTION Research of large lakes is highly complex as such lakes expand over a large area and are affected by an enormous number of different climatic and environmental factors (Blenckner, 2008). Various specific indicators and indexes are needed to facilitate the understanding of the state (and its changes) of large lakes. The zooplankton : phytoplankton biomass ratio ([MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII]) largely reflects the type (effectiveness) of the food web in a water body and hence the nature of the ecosystem. Indirectly, it characterizes dominating groups in phyto- and zooplankton, feeding relationships between them and fish, as well as the pressure of fish on zooplankton. The [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] ratio can be used as a marker criterion for the evaluation of the trophy of a water body and its ecosystem and, particularly, for permanent monitoring of a water body. This ratio decreases with the rise of the trophic state (Gulati, 1983; Andronikova, 1996; Jeppesen et al., 1999, 2000, 2005; Haberman & Laugaste, 2003). It is widely recognized that phytoplankton is influenced most by nutrients (bottom up) while zooplankton is influenced both by consumers (top down) and algae (bottom up). This causes their different seasonal dynamics and complicated relevant ratios. Thus, the values of the [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] ratio are fluctuating within and across years. This variability has not been thoroughly analysed. Some data concerning this ratio for L. Peipsi have been published on the basis of plankton sampled up to the end of the last century (Haberman, 1996; Haberman & Laugaste, 2003; Noges & Noges, 2006). As the situation in the lake has changed markedly during this decade, a new analysis of the ratio has been initiated. About two decades ago, the ecosystem of the lake was in a quite good balance, and an effective algal food web prevailed in the open water (Noges et al., 1993). Since the late 1990s and during the 2000s, the ecosystem of the lake lost its stability. The proportion of cyanobacteria in the biomass of summer phytoplankton increased consistently: from 20% to 70% in L. Peipsi sensu stricto (s.s.), and from 30% to 90% in the southern lake parts (Laugaste et al., 2007). An appreciable concentration of microcystins was detected in the lake water in the summer months of the 2000s (Tanner et al., 2005), and the biomass of the genus Microcystis exceeded 20 g [m.sup.-3] in the southern lake parts in some years. At the same time, a continuous decline in zooplankton (Haberman et al., 2008) and changes in fish population (Kangur et al., 2008) were observed. The stock of planktivorous smelt (Osmerus eperlanus eperlanus m. spirinchus Pallas) and vendace (Coregonus albula (L.)) decreased drastically, and the abundance of piscivorous pikeperch (Stizostedion lucioperca (L.)) increased but, owing to over-fishing, the amount of pikeperch is modest (Kangur et al., 2008). Noges et al. (2005) explained the destabilization of the ecosystem with a decrease in the N : P ratio caused by increased phosphorus loading and reduced nitrogen loading in recent decades. The aim of this study was to follow the variations of the [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] ratio in different months, in different parts of the lake, and in different years; to establish boundaries of this variability, and to analyse how its changes reflect the state of the lake. We argue that the [MATHEMATICAL EXPRESSION NOT REPRODUCIBLE IN ASCII] ratio (particularly the mean for a growing season) can be used as a marker characteristic for estimating the trophy of a water body. STUDY SITE Lake Peipsi sensu lato (s.l.) is a large (area 3555 [km.sup.2], the fourth largest lake in Europe) and shallow (mean depth 7.1 m), mainly unstratified lowland water body. Located on the Estonian-Russian border, L. Peipsi is the largest trans boundary lake in Europe. …
浮游动物的时空变化:大型浅湖浮游植物生物量比
大型湖泊的研究是非常复杂的,因为这些湖泊的面积很大,并且受到大量不同的气候和环境因素的影响(Blenckner, 2008)。需要各种具体的指标和指标来促进对大型湖泊状态(及其变化)的了解。浮游动物:浮游植物生物量比([数学表达式不可用ASCII重现])在很大程度上反映了水体中食物网的类型(有效性),从而反映了生态系统的性质。间接地,它描述了浮游植物和动物的主要群体,它们与鱼类之间的摄食关系,以及鱼类对浮游动物的压力。该比率可用作评价水体及其生态系统的价值的标记标准,特别是用于对水体的永久监测。这个比例随着营养状态的增加而降低(Gulati, 1983;Andronikova, 1996;Jeppesen et al., 1999,2000,2005;Haberman & Laugaste, 2003)。人们普遍认为,浮游植物受营养物质(自下而上)的影响最大,而浮游动物受消费者(自上而下)和藻类(自下而上)的影响最大。这就造成了它们不同的季节动态和复杂的相关比率。因此,比率的值在年内和年内是波动的。这种可变性尚未得到彻底的分析。根据上世纪末的浮游生物取样,已经发表了关于l.p ipsi这一比率的一些数据(Haberman, 1996;Haberman & laughaste, 2003;Noges & Noges, 2006)。由于该湖的情况在这十年中发生了显著变化,因此开始对该比率进行新的分析。大约20年前,该湖的生态系统处于相当良好的平衡状态,开放水域普遍存在有效的藻类食物网(Noges et al., 1993)。自20世纪90年代末和21世纪初以来,湖泊的生态系统失去了稳定性。蓝藻在夏季浮游植物生物量中的比例持续增加:在l.p eipsi sensu stricto (s.s.)中从20%增加到70%,在南湖部分从30%增加到90% (Laugaste et al., 2007)。在21世纪头十年的夏季,湖水中检测到微囊藻毒素的浓度相当高(Tanner et al., 2005),微囊藻属的生物量超过20 g [m.sup]。[3]在某些年份南部湖泊部分。与此同时,浮游动物数量持续下降(Haberman et al., 2008),鱼类数量发生变化(Kangur et al., 2008)。浮游食性鲈鱼(Osmerus eperlanus m. spirinchus Pallas)和食鱼(Coregonus albula)的数量急剧减少,而食鱼鲈鱼(Stizostedion lucioperca (L.))的丰度增加,但由于过度捕捞,鲈鱼的数量并不多(Kangur et al., 2008)。Noges等人(2005)解释了近几十年来磷负荷增加和氮负荷减少导致的氮磷比下降导致生态系统的不稳定。本研究的目的是跟踪[数学表达式不可重复在ASCII中]比率的变化在不同月份,在湖泊的不同部分,在不同年份;建立这种变化的边界,并分析其变化如何反映湖泊的状态。我们认为[数学表达式不可在ASCII中重现]比率(特别是生长季节的平均值)可以用作估计水体的奖杯的标记特征。Peipsi sensu lato湖(s.l.)是一个面积3555 [km.sup.]的大型湖泊。[2],欧洲第四大湖泊)和浅(平均深度7.1 m),主要是无分层的低地水体。佩普西湖位于爱沙尼亚和俄罗斯边境,是欧洲最大的跨界湖。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信