Functional Outcomes, Complications, and Failure Rates in Workers’ Compensation Patients Following Hip Arthroscopic Repair: A Systematic Review

Mohammed A. Munim, Linsen T Samuel, James Rosneck, A. Kamath
{"title":"Functional Outcomes, Complications, and Failure Rates in Workers’ Compensation Patients Following Hip Arthroscopic Repair: A Systematic Review","authors":"Mohammed A. Munim, Linsen T Samuel, James Rosneck, A. Kamath","doi":"10.1177/15563316231183093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studies on the feasibility of hip arthroscopy in workers’ compensation (WC) patients have been largely inconsistent or limited by study design, necessitating the need for a systematic review. We sought to systematically compare clinically significant differences between WC patients and their counterparts in relation to (1) functional outcomes, (2) complications, and (3) failure rates after hip arthroscopy. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases for studies published between January 1996 and February 2021. In combination with “AND” or “OR” Boolean operators, the following keywords were implemented: “hip arthroscopy,” “workers’ compensation,” “outcomes,” “complications,” “revision,” and “failure rates.” Two reviewers screened eligible studies, evaluated methodological quality, and abstracted data. In the 13 studies pooled, comprising 1874 patients, 276 (14.7%) patients received WC benefits. Twelve studies utilized functional outcomes, 2 studies assessed pain, and 3 studies evaluated satisfaction. Despite scoring lower in these measures preoperatively, WC patients demonstrated significant improvements after hip arthroscopy. Three studies linked compensation with marginally inferior functional scores, but this association was not significant at longer follow-up. Seven studies examined complication incidence, and 6 studies addressed failure rates, with all reporting no significant differences in rates of complications, secondary arthroscopies, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty. The findings of this systematic review suggest that hip arthroscopy offers clinically significant benefits, regardless of WC status. Postoperative results in WC patients, including functional scores, pain, satisfaction, complications, and failure rates, were favorable, and the degree of improvement was at least comparable with their counterparts. Further studies should consider prospective study designs with larger cohorts and extended follow-up.","PeriodicalId":253125,"journal":{"name":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HSS Journal®: The Musculoskeletal Journal of Hospital for Special Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15563316231183093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Studies on the feasibility of hip arthroscopy in workers’ compensation (WC) patients have been largely inconsistent or limited by study design, necessitating the need for a systematic review. We sought to systematically compare clinically significant differences between WC patients and their counterparts in relation to (1) functional outcomes, (2) complications, and (3) failure rates after hip arthroscopy. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and PubMed databases for studies published between January 1996 and February 2021. In combination with “AND” or “OR” Boolean operators, the following keywords were implemented: “hip arthroscopy,” “workers’ compensation,” “outcomes,” “complications,” “revision,” and “failure rates.” Two reviewers screened eligible studies, evaluated methodological quality, and abstracted data. In the 13 studies pooled, comprising 1874 patients, 276 (14.7%) patients received WC benefits. Twelve studies utilized functional outcomes, 2 studies assessed pain, and 3 studies evaluated satisfaction. Despite scoring lower in these measures preoperatively, WC patients demonstrated significant improvements after hip arthroscopy. Three studies linked compensation with marginally inferior functional scores, but this association was not significant at longer follow-up. Seven studies examined complication incidence, and 6 studies addressed failure rates, with all reporting no significant differences in rates of complications, secondary arthroscopies, or conversion to total hip arthroplasty. The findings of this systematic review suggest that hip arthroscopy offers clinically significant benefits, regardless of WC status. Postoperative results in WC patients, including functional scores, pain, satisfaction, complications, and failure rates, were favorable, and the degree of improvement was at least comparable with their counterparts. Further studies should consider prospective study designs with larger cohorts and extended follow-up.
髋关节镜修复后工人补偿患者的功能结局、并发症和失败率:一项系统综述
关于髋关节镜治疗工伤赔偿(WC)患者可行性的研究在很大程度上不一致或受到研究设计的限制,因此需要进行系统综述。我们试图系统地比较WC患者与同行患者在髋关节镜术后(1)功能结局、(2)并发症和(3)失败率方面的临床显著差异。我们检索了MEDLINE、EMBASE和PubMed数据库中1996年1月至2021年2月间发表的研究。结合“AND”或“or”布尔运算符,实现了以下关键词:“髋关节镜检查”、“工人赔偿”、“结果”、“并发症”、“翻修”和“失败率”。两位审稿人筛选了符合条件的研究,评估了方法学质量,并提取了数据。在合并的13项研究中,包括1874名患者,276名(14.7%)患者获得了WC益处。12项研究使用功能结果,2项研究评估疼痛,3项研究评估满意度。尽管术前这些指标的得分较低,但WC患者在髋关节镜检查后表现出显著的改善。三项研究将补偿与较差的功能评分联系起来,但这种联系在较长时间的随访中并不显著。7项研究调查了并发症发生率,6项研究调查了失败率,所有研究都报告了并发症、二次关节镜检查或转全髋关节置换术的发生率无显著差异。本系统综述的结果表明,无论WC状态如何,髋关节镜检查均可提供显著的临床益处。WC患者的术后结果,包括功能评分、疼痛、满意度、并发症和失败率,都是有利的,其改善程度至少与同行相当。进一步的研究应考虑更大的队列和延长随访的前瞻性研究设计。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信