Possibility of Physical Education for Development of Empathy

Takahiro Kano, Yuji Yamamoto
{"title":"Possibility of Physical Education for Development of Empathy","authors":"Takahiro Kano, Yuji Yamamoto","doi":"10.4146/jjspopsy.2019-1907","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explored the possibility of conducting physical education classes for the development of empathy. To this end, we examined both the listening behavior in the mathematics class and cooperative behavior while playing tag in the physical education class of 33 children in the 1 st grade of elementary school. The tag game consisted of two defenders against three attackers. The listening behavior in the classroom was considered as the behavior of empathy, and evaluated by two researchers using video analysis of children’s gaze direction and postural stability while seated in the chair in the classroom. The loss scores in the tag game were regarded as cooperative skills of two defenders. As a case study, the movements of two different dyads in the tag game who showed different listening behaviors in the classroom were also recorded and analyzed. The authors also analyzed the movement of the players and the interpersonal distance between defenders and between attackers and defenders. Results revealed that there was a significant positive correlation between the listening and cooperative behaviors. This finding suggests that the dyads of children who had better listening behavior, that is, keeping the gaze directed at speakers and stable posture in the classroom, had lost fewer scores in the tag game. The case study of the tag games revealed that the dyads of children who had better listening behavior could maintain interpersonal distance between defenders, even if the number of attackers were more than that of defenders. On the other hand, the dyads of defenders who had poor listening behavior could not maintain interpersonal distance among themselves because they did not pay attention to other defenders ʼ movements. However, although the dyads with poor listening scored low in some games, they could show high cooperative skills in the tag game. The results suggest that the task constraints of the tag game led to cooperative skill; such task constraints in physical education could facilitate shared intention among children, which could be generalized to the development of empathy.","PeriodicalId":257319,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Sport Psychology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Sport Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4146/jjspopsy.2019-1907","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explored the possibility of conducting physical education classes for the development of empathy. To this end, we examined both the listening behavior in the mathematics class and cooperative behavior while playing tag in the physical education class of 33 children in the 1 st grade of elementary school. The tag game consisted of two defenders against three attackers. The listening behavior in the classroom was considered as the behavior of empathy, and evaluated by two researchers using video analysis of children’s gaze direction and postural stability while seated in the chair in the classroom. The loss scores in the tag game were regarded as cooperative skills of two defenders. As a case study, the movements of two different dyads in the tag game who showed different listening behaviors in the classroom were also recorded and analyzed. The authors also analyzed the movement of the players and the interpersonal distance between defenders and between attackers and defenders. Results revealed that there was a significant positive correlation between the listening and cooperative behaviors. This finding suggests that the dyads of children who had better listening behavior, that is, keeping the gaze directed at speakers and stable posture in the classroom, had lost fewer scores in the tag game. The case study of the tag games revealed that the dyads of children who had better listening behavior could maintain interpersonal distance between defenders, even if the number of attackers were more than that of defenders. On the other hand, the dyads of defenders who had poor listening behavior could not maintain interpersonal distance among themselves because they did not pay attention to other defenders ʼ movements. However, although the dyads with poor listening scored low in some games, they could show high cooperative skills in the tag game. The results suggest that the task constraints of the tag game led to cooperative skill; such task constraints in physical education could facilitate shared intention among children, which could be generalized to the development of empathy.
体育教育对共情发展的可能性
本研究探讨了体育课对移情发展的可能性。为此,我们调查了33名小学一年级儿童在数学课上的听力行为和在体育课上玩捉人游戏时的合作行为。捉人游戏由两名防守者对三名进攻者组成。将课堂上的倾听行为视为移情行为,两位研究者通过视频分析对儿童在课堂上坐在椅子上时的凝视方向和姿势稳定性进行评价。捉人游戏中的输分被认为是两个防守者的合作技巧。作为案例研究,我们还记录和分析了在课堂上表现出不同听力行为的两个不同的二人组在标签游戏中的动作。分析了球员的移动和防守队员之间、进攻队员与防守队员之间的人际距离。结果发现,听力与合作行为之间存在显著的正相关关系。这一发现表明,那些有更好的倾听行为的孩子,即在教室里保持凝视演讲者和稳定姿势的孩子,在标签游戏中损失的分数更少。通过对标签游戏的案例研究发现,即使攻击者的数量多于防御者的数量,具有较好倾听行为的二对儿童仍能保持防御者之间的人际距离。另一方面,聆听行为较差的防守者组由于没有注意到其他防守者的动作而无法保持人际距离。然而,尽管听力差的二人组在某些游戏中得分较低,但他们在标签游戏中表现出较高的合作技能。结果表明,标签游戏的任务约束导致了合作技能的产生;在体育教学中,这种任务约束可以促进儿童之间的共同意向,这可以推广到共情的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信