Data-driven selection of motion correction techniques in breast DCE-MRI

Gabriele Piantadosi, S. Marrone, R. Fusco, A. Petrillo, M. Sansone, Carlo Sansone
{"title":"Data-driven selection of motion correction techniques in breast DCE-MRI","authors":"Gabriele Piantadosi, S. Marrone, R. Fusco, A. Petrillo, M. Sansone, Carlo Sansone","doi":"10.1109/MeMeA.2015.7145212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is well known that some sort of motion correction technique (MCT) should be performed before DCE-MRI data analysis in order to reduce movement artefacts. However, it is not clear if a single MCT can produce optimum results for every single examination, since for example different movements can occur. In this paper we investigated the possibility of choosing the best MCT per each specific patient, before performing further data analysis (e.g. tumour segmentation). In particular, our aim is the proposal of some physiological model-based quality indexes (QIs) for ranking different MCT on a patient basis. Moreover, for practical feasibility, we investigated the performance of our proposal when only a small fraction of the available data was used. We performed tests on a dataset of patients with breast tumour. Specifically, for each patient we compared the “reference ranking” of different MCT obtained by using the results of tumour segmentation with the rankings produced with each QI. Our results indicate that the ranking obtained by using the QI based on the Extended Tofts-Kermode model (with the Parker arterial input function) are in accordance with the “reference ranking”. Moreover, computational load can be significantly reduced without affecting the overall performance by using only 5% of the available data.","PeriodicalId":277757,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) Proceedings","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MeMeA.2015.7145212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

It is well known that some sort of motion correction technique (MCT) should be performed before DCE-MRI data analysis in order to reduce movement artefacts. However, it is not clear if a single MCT can produce optimum results for every single examination, since for example different movements can occur. In this paper we investigated the possibility of choosing the best MCT per each specific patient, before performing further data analysis (e.g. tumour segmentation). In particular, our aim is the proposal of some physiological model-based quality indexes (QIs) for ranking different MCT on a patient basis. Moreover, for practical feasibility, we investigated the performance of our proposal when only a small fraction of the available data was used. We performed tests on a dataset of patients with breast tumour. Specifically, for each patient we compared the “reference ranking” of different MCT obtained by using the results of tumour segmentation with the rankings produced with each QI. Our results indicate that the ranking obtained by using the QI based on the Extended Tofts-Kermode model (with the Parker arterial input function) are in accordance with the “reference ranking”. Moreover, computational load can be significantly reduced without affecting the overall performance by using only 5% of the available data.
数据驱动的乳腺DCE-MRI运动校正技术选择
众所周知,在DCE-MRI数据分析之前应该进行某种运动校正技术(MCT),以减少运动伪影。然而,目前尚不清楚单一MCT是否可以为每次检查产生最佳结果,因为例如可能发生不同的运动。在本文中,我们研究了在进行进一步的数据分析(例如肿瘤分割)之前,为每个特定患者选择最佳MCT的可能性。特别是,我们的目标是提出一些基于生理模型的质量指标(QIs),以便根据患者对不同的MCT进行排名。此外,为了实际的可行性,我们研究了仅使用一小部分可用数据时我们的建议的性能。我们对乳腺肿瘤患者的数据集进行了测试。具体而言,对于每个患者,我们将使用肿瘤分割结果获得的不同MCT的“参考排名”与每个QI产生的排名进行了比较。我们的研究结果表明,基于扩展Tofts-Kermode模型(带有Parker动脉输入函数)的QI得到的排名符合“参考排名”。此外,只需使用5%的可用数据,就可以在不影响整体性能的情况下显著降低计算负载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信