Этноконфессиональный ландшафт Республики Алтай: глобальные вызовы и локальные ответы

E. A. Erokhina
{"title":"Этноконфессиональный ландшафт Республики Алтай: глобальные вызовы и локальные ответы","authors":"E. A. Erokhina","doi":"10.22162/2619-0990-2020-48-2-436-454","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The article studies the contemporary ethno-confessional landscape of the Altai Republic as part of historical/cultural heritage, and as a factor influencing certain present-day sociocultural processes. Goals. The work seeks to identify constants and development trends in ethno-confessional relations in the region. Methods. M. Weber’s theory of social action and several sociophilosophical concepts, including those of sociocultural neotraditionalism, collective memory and collective trauma, constitute the theoretical framework of the study. The latter summarizes results of 2003-2018 sociological surveys that revealed most significant — for the collective memory of the Altai peoples – historical events to have posed global challenges in modern and contemporary history, namely: disintegration of nomadic power structures and inclusion in the orbit of an essentially differing civilization, transition to modernization, and pressure of world religions. Results. At the turn of the 21st century, a number of trends have emerged that can be qualified as collective responses to such global challenges: revival of family and clan self-organization forms, preservation of traditional economic paradigms, rejection of technocratic attributes of modernization, development of neo-traditional syncretic religious forms. Conclusions. The analysis of statistical data, materials of regional media and social networks, included observations make it possible to distinguish some actual development trends in ethno-confessional relations in the region: conservation (despite the crisis) of local human potential characterized by that quite a number of individuals tackle ethnocultural, religious/mystical, and mythopoetic creativity jobs which, thus, transform the sphere of the sacred into a space for political, civil, and generational discourse. Public consciousness of natives is also marked by dualism of secular and religious aspects, while sacralization of memory might be a means to use cultural heritage in overcoming the collective trauma caused by modernization.","PeriodicalId":434355,"journal":{"name":"The Oriental studies","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Oriental studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22162/2619-0990-2020-48-2-436-454","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. The article studies the contemporary ethno-confessional landscape of the Altai Republic as part of historical/cultural heritage, and as a factor influencing certain present-day sociocultural processes. Goals. The work seeks to identify constants and development trends in ethno-confessional relations in the region. Methods. M. Weber’s theory of social action and several sociophilosophical concepts, including those of sociocultural neotraditionalism, collective memory and collective trauma, constitute the theoretical framework of the study. The latter summarizes results of 2003-2018 sociological surveys that revealed most significant — for the collective memory of the Altai peoples – historical events to have posed global challenges in modern and contemporary history, namely: disintegration of nomadic power structures and inclusion in the orbit of an essentially differing civilization, transition to modernization, and pressure of world religions. Results. At the turn of the 21st century, a number of trends have emerged that can be qualified as collective responses to such global challenges: revival of family and clan self-organization forms, preservation of traditional economic paradigms, rejection of technocratic attributes of modernization, development of neo-traditional syncretic religious forms. Conclusions. The analysis of statistical data, materials of regional media and social networks, included observations make it possible to distinguish some actual development trends in ethno-confessional relations in the region: conservation (despite the crisis) of local human potential characterized by that quite a number of individuals tackle ethnocultural, religious/mystical, and mythopoetic creativity jobs which, thus, transform the sphere of the sacred into a space for political, civil, and generational discourse. Public consciousness of natives is also marked by dualism of secular and religious aspects, while sacralization of memory might be a means to use cultural heritage in overcoming the collective trauma caused by modernization.
阿尔泰共和国的民族信仰景观:全球挑战和地方回应
介绍。本文将阿尔泰共和国的当代民族自白景观作为历史/文化遗产的一部分,并作为影响当今某些社会文化进程的因素进行研究。的目标。这项工作旨在确定该区域种族-教派关系中的常数和发展趋势。方法。韦伯的社会行动理论和社会文化新传统主义、集体记忆和集体创伤等社会哲学概念构成了本研究的理论框架。后者总结了2003-2018年的社会学调查结果,这些调查揭示了对阿尔泰人的集体记忆来说最重要的历史事件,这些历史事件在现当代历史上构成了全球性挑战,即:游牧权力结构的解体和被纳入本质上不同的文明轨道,向现代化的过渡,以及世界宗教的压力。结果。在21世纪之交,出现了一些趋势,这些趋势可以作为对这些全球挑战的集体回应:家庭和氏族自组织形式的复兴,传统经济范式的保留,对现代化的技术官僚属性的拒绝,新传统融合宗教形式的发展。结论。对统计数据、区域媒体和社会网络材料的分析,包括观察结果,使我们能够区分本区域种族-教派关系的一些实际发展趋势:当地人类潜能的保护(尽管存在危机),其特点是相当多的个人从事民族文化、宗教/神秘主义和神话诗歌创造工作,从而将神圣的领域转变为政治、公民和代际话语的空间。原住民的公共意识也具有世俗与宗教的二元论特征,而记忆的神圣化可能是利用文化遗产来克服现代化带来的集体创伤的一种手段。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信