Incarnation and Divine Essence in Daesoon Thought: A Comparative Study between Daesoon thought and Christianity

B. Rigal-Cellard
{"title":"Incarnation and Divine Essence in Daesoon Thought: A Comparative Study between Daesoon thought and Christianity","authors":"B. Rigal-Cellard","doi":"10.25050/jdtrea.2022.1.2.61","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article compares the concepts of divine incarnation as expounded in Daesoon Thought and in Christianity and questions the essence of the divinity in both traditions. In Daesoon Thought, The Supreme God, Sangje, saw major disorganization leading to extreme violence and doom and decided to incarnate on earth under the human form of Kang Jeungsan (1871–1909). Then the living God taught the solution to human suffering through the revelations he sent in 1917 to Jo Cheol-Je, or Jo Jeongsan (1895– 1958) and the revelations were passed on to Dojeon Park Wudang who in 1969 founded Daesoon Thought. In Christianity, God incarnated in his son, Jesus Christ, who allowed for the radical transformation of the condition of man through his physical sacrifice. Daesoon differs in that Sangje did not offer himself as sacrifice when he came on earth but reorganized the world and taught how to apply benevolence to establish the Earthly Paradise. The affirmation that Daesoon Jinrihoe is both monotheistic and polytheistic is then analyzed. If the concept of monotheism seems to differ vastly between the two traditions, it appears that biblical monotheism is itself relatively young in the history of world religions so that Christianity has ancient roots germane to those of Daesoon Jinrihoe. The article concludes on the originality of this religion: though it is built on Daoism, Buddhism and Confucianism, it has transformed their vision of the deity and of its message in a most convincing manner.","PeriodicalId":259212,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Korean Society of Forest Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25050/jdtrea.2022.1.2.61","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This article compares the concepts of divine incarnation as expounded in Daesoon Thought and in Christianity and questions the essence of the divinity in both traditions. In Daesoon Thought, The Supreme God, Sangje, saw major disorganization leading to extreme violence and doom and decided to incarnate on earth under the human form of Kang Jeungsan (1871–1909). Then the living God taught the solution to human suffering through the revelations he sent in 1917 to Jo Cheol-Je, or Jo Jeongsan (1895– 1958) and the revelations were passed on to Dojeon Park Wudang who in 1969 founded Daesoon Thought. In Christianity, God incarnated in his son, Jesus Christ, who allowed for the radical transformation of the condition of man through his physical sacrifice. Daesoon differs in that Sangje did not offer himself as sacrifice when he came on earth but reorganized the world and taught how to apply benevolence to establish the Earthly Paradise. The affirmation that Daesoon Jinrihoe is both monotheistic and polytheistic is then analyzed. If the concept of monotheism seems to differ vastly between the two traditions, it appears that biblical monotheism is itself relatively young in the history of world religions so that Christianity has ancient roots germane to those of Daesoon Jinrihoe. The article concludes on the originality of this religion: though it is built on Daoism, Buddhism and Confucianism, it has transformed their vision of the deity and of its message in a most convincing manner.
大宣思想中的化身与神性:大宣思想与基督教的比较研究
本文比较了大宣思想和基督教中所阐述的神性化身的概念,并对这两种传统中神性的本质提出了质疑。在《大顺思想》中,最高神尚济看到了严重的混乱,导致了极端的暴力和毁灭,于是决定化身为康正山(1871-1909)。接着,活神于1917年向赵哲济(1895 ~ 1958年)传达了解决人类苦难的方法,并传给了1969年创立“大宣思想”的朴武当。在基督教中,上帝化身为他的儿子耶稣基督,他允许通过他的身体牺牲彻底改变人类的状况。大宣的不同之处在于,僧济来到人间时并没有把自己献为祭品,而是重新组织了世界,并教导人们如何运用仁慈来建立人间天堂。接着分析了大宣真理会既是一神论又是多神论的肯定。如果一神论的概念在两种传统之间似乎有很大的不同,那么圣经一神论在世界宗教史上似乎是相对年轻的,因此基督教具有与大宣真理会密切相关的古老根源。文章总结了这种宗教的原创性:虽然它建立在道教、佛教和儒家的基础上,但它以一种最令人信服的方式改变了他们对神的看法及其信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信