A Pooled Analysis of Mortality in Patients with COPD Receiving Triple Therapy versus Dual Bronchodilation

M. Miravitlles, P. Calverley, K. Verhamme, M. Dreher, V. Bayer, A. Gardev, A. Hoz, J. Wedzicha, D. Price
{"title":"A Pooled Analysis of Mortality in Patients with COPD Receiving Triple Therapy versus Dual Bronchodilation","authors":"M. Miravitlles, P. Calverley, K. Verhamme, M. Dreher, V. Bayer, A. Gardev, A. Hoz, J. Wedzicha, D. Price","doi":"10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction : A possible mortality benefit of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) versus LAMA+LABA combination treatment is reported in patients with highly symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with a history of exacerbations (≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in previous year). We compared the time to all-cause mortality with LAMA+LABA+ICS versus LAMA+LABA in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and predominantly lower exacerbation risk. Methods : Patients who received either LAMA+LABA+ICS (n=11,891) or LAMA+LABA (n=3,156) were pooled from phase 3/4 randomized controlled trials (TONADO 1/2, DYNAGITO, WISDOM, UPLIFT and TIOSPIR). Analysis was on-treatment and censored at 52 weeks. Propensity score (PS)-matched cohorts (covariates: age, sex, Conclusions : This pooled analysis showed no differences in mortality between LAMA+LABA and LAMA+LABA+ICS in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and predominantly lower exacerbation risk.","PeriodicalId":169302,"journal":{"name":"TP40. TP040 COPD CLINICAL TRIALS AND THERAPIES","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TP40. TP040 COPD CLINICAL TRIALS AND THERAPIES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1164/AJRCCM-CONFERENCE.2021.203.1_MEETINGABSTRACTS.A2251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Introduction : A possible mortality benefit of long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA)/long-acting β2-agonist (LABA)/inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) versus LAMA+LABA combination treatment is reported in patients with highly symptomatic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with a history of exacerbations (≥1 moderate/severe exacerbation in previous year). We compared the time to all-cause mortality with LAMA+LABA+ICS versus LAMA+LABA in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and predominantly lower exacerbation risk. Methods : Patients who received either LAMA+LABA+ICS (n=11,891) or LAMA+LABA (n=3,156) were pooled from phase 3/4 randomized controlled trials (TONADO 1/2, DYNAGITO, WISDOM, UPLIFT and TIOSPIR). Analysis was on-treatment and censored at 52 weeks. Propensity score (PS)-matched cohorts (covariates: age, sex, Conclusions : This pooled analysis showed no differences in mortality between LAMA+LABA and LAMA+LABA+ICS in patients with moderate-to-severe COPD and predominantly lower exacerbation risk.
慢性阻塞性肺病患者接受三联治疗与双重支气管扩张的死亡率汇总分析
导论:据报道,在有急性发作史(前一年≥1次中度/重度急性发作)的重度症状慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者中,长效毒蕈碱拮抗剂(LAMA)/长效β2激动剂(LABA)/吸入皮质类固醇(ICS)与LAMA+LABA联合治疗相比,可能在死亡率上有优势。我们比较了LAMA+LABA+ICS与LAMA+LABA在中重度COPD患者的全因死亡率和急性加重风险较低的时间。方法:从3/4期随机对照试验(TONADO 1/2、DYNAGITO、WISDOM、UPLIFT和TIOSPIR)中收集接受LAMA+LABA+ICS (n=11,891)或LAMA+LABA (n=3,156)的患者。在治疗52周时进行分析和审查。结论:本汇总分析显示,在中度至重度COPD患者中,LAMA+LABA和LAMA+LABA+ICS的死亡率无差异,急性加重风险明显较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信